Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房物理康复94项随机对照试验中的治疗保真度:一项范围综述

Treatment Fidelity in 94 Randomized Controlled Trials of Physical Rehabilitation in the ICU: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Farley Christopher, Newman Anastasia N L, Hoogenes Jen, Brooks Dina, Duffett Mark, Kho Michelle E

机构信息

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Departments of Pediatrics and Health Research, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2024 May 1;52(5):717-728. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006192. Epub 2024 Jan 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Recent reviews demonstrated discordant effects of ICU-based physical rehabilitation on physical function. These inconsistencies may be related to differences in treatment fidelity-the extent to which a protocol is delivered as planned. Before evaluating the association of fidelity with outcomes, we must first understand the extent of treatment fidelity reporting in ICU-based physical rehabilitation randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

DATA SOURCES

Six electronic databases from inception to December 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

We included RCTs enrolling adults or children admitted to the ICU, if greater than or equal to 50% were invasively mechanically ventilated greater than 24 hours, and underwent an ICU-based physical rehabilitation intervention, with no limitation to comparators or outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION

We screened and extracted data independently and in duplicate, with a third reviewer as needed. Extracted data included study characteristics, treatment descriptions, and the presence of National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium (NIH-BCC) treatment fidelity tool components. Treatment fidelity scores were calculated as the proportion of reported (numerator) out of total NIH-BCC components (denominator). We calculated scores across studies and by treatment group (intervention vs. comparator). We used linear regression to assess for a time trend in study treatment fidelity scores.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 20,433 citations, 94 studies met inclusion criteria. Authors reported a median (first-third quartiles) of 19% (14-26%) of treatment fidelity components across studies. Intervention group scores were higher than comparator groups (24% [19-33%] vs. 14% [5-24%], p < 0.01). We found a mean increase in study treatment fidelity scores by 0.7% (0.3 points) per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 19% of treatment fidelity components were reported across studies, with comparator groups more poorly reported. Future research could investigate ways to optimize treatment fidelity reporting and determine characteristics associated with treatment fidelity conduct in ICU-based physical rehabilitation RCTs.

摘要

目的

近期综述显示,基于重症监护病房(ICU)的物理康复对身体功能的影响存在不一致性。这些不一致可能与治疗依从性差异有关,即方案按计划实施的程度。在评估依从性与结局的关联之前,我们必须首先了解基于ICU的物理康复随机对照试验(RCT)中治疗依从性报告的程度。

数据来源

从数据库建立至2022年12月的六个电子数据库。

研究选择

我们纳入了招募入住ICU的成人或儿童的RCT,如果≥50%的患者接受有创机械通气超过24小时,并接受了基于ICU的物理康复干预,对对照或结局无限制。

数据提取

我们独立且重复地筛选和提取数据,必要时由第三位审阅者参与。提取的数据包括研究特征、治疗描述以及美国国立卫生研究院行为改变联盟(NIH-BCC)治疗依从性工具组件的存在情况。治疗依从性得分计算为报告的NIH-BCC组件数量(分子)占NIH-BCC组件总数(分母)的比例。我们计算了各研究以及各治疗组(干预组与对照组)的得分。我们使用线性回归评估研究治疗依从性得分的时间趋势。

数据综合

在20433条文献中,94项研究符合纳入标准。作者报告各研究中治疗依从性组件的中位数(第一-第三四分位数)为19%(14%-26%)。干预组得分高于对照组(24% [19%-33%] 对14% [5%-24%],p<0.01)。我们发现研究治疗依从性得分每年平均增加0.7%(0.3分)。

结论

各研究中仅报告了19%的治疗依从性组件,对照组报告情况更差。未来研究可探讨优化治疗依从性报告的方法,并确定基于ICU的物理康复RCT中与治疗依从性实施相关的特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验