Suppr超能文献

乙酰唑胺治疗大剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗患者急性肾损伤的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Acetazolamide for acute kidney injury in patients undergoing high dose methotrexate therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Nephrol. 2024 May;37(4):911-922. doi: 10.1007/s40620-023-01850-2. Epub 2024 Jan 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urine alkalization is one of the standard treatments to prevent acute kidney injury in patients receiving high-dose methotrexate. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are promising adjuvants/substitutes with advantages such as faster urine alkalization time and prevention of fluid overload. However, there is limited and contradictory evidence on its efficacy and safety. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors to standard treatments in adult patients receiving high-dose methotrexate.

METHODS

The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022352802) in August 2021. We evaluated the use of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors in combination with standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone. We excluded articles irrelevant to the efficacy and safety of acetazolamide in patients receiving high dose methotrexate and/or did not provide sufficient data regarding doses, recruitment criteria, and follow-up period. Two authors performed the data extraction independently.

RESULTS

Among 198 articles retrieved, six observational studies met all eligibility criteria. Four studies with five datasets (totaling 558 patients/cycles) had enough data to be included in the meta-analysis. We independently report the results from the two remaining studies. The results did not show a significant difference between acetazolamide versus standard treatment in acute kidney injury (AKI) rate (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.48-1.29, P = 0.34, I = 0%). Regarding the time to urine pH goal, there was no significant time difference between the two groups (Mean Difference = 0.07, 95% CI - 1.9 to 2.04, P = 0.95, I = 25%). Furthermore, our meta-analysis showed that acetazolamide did not reduce length of stay (Mean Difference = 0.75, 95% CI - 0.8 to 2.31, P = 0.34, I = 0%). In one study, the only reported side effect of acetazolamide was hypokalemia (nearly 50% in the acetazolamide group).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review showed no significant difference between acetazolamide and standard care treatment regarding urine alkalinization time and AKI rate in adult patients receiving high dose methotrexate. We suggest performing a large blinded, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the potential benefits of this low-cost medication.

摘要

背景

碱化尿液是预防接受大剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者发生急性肾损伤的标准治疗方法之一。碳酸酐酶抑制剂是一种很有前途的辅助药物/替代品,具有更快的尿液碱化时间和预防液体超负荷的优点。然而,其疗效和安全性的证据有限且存在矛盾。我们旨在比较碳酸酐酶抑制剂与标准治疗在接受大剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗的成年患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

该方案于 2021 年 8 月在 PROSPERO(CRD42022352802)注册。我们评估了碳酸酐酶抑制剂联合标准治疗与单独标准治疗相比的效果。我们排除了与乙酰唑胺在接受大剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者中的疗效和安全性无关的文章,且未提供关于剂量、招募标准和随访期的足够数据。两位作者独立进行数据提取。

结果

在检索到的 198 篇文章中,有 6 项观察性研究符合所有纳入标准。其中 4 项研究(5 个数据集,共 558 例患者/周期)有足够的数据纳入荟萃分析。我们独立报告了另外 2 项研究的结果。结果显示,乙酰唑胺与标准治疗在急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率方面无显著差异(OR=0.79,95%CI 0.48-1.29,P=0.34,I²=0%)。至于达到尿液 pH 值目标的时间,两组之间没有显著的时间差异(平均差值=0.07,95%CI-1.9 至 2.04,P=0.95,I²=25%)。此外,我们的荟萃分析显示,乙酰唑胺并未缩短住院时间(平均差值=0.75,95%CI-0.8 至 2.31,P=0.34,I²=0%)。在一项研究中,乙酰唑胺唯一报告的副作用是低钾血症(乙酰唑胺组近 50%)。

结论

本系统评价显示,在接受大剂量甲氨蝶呤治疗的成年患者中,乙酰唑胺与标准治疗在尿液碱化时间和 AKI 发生率方面无显著差异。我们建议进行一项大型、盲法、随机、对照试验,以评估这种低成本药物的潜在益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验