Kapadia Muneera R, Senatore Peter J, Messick Craig, Hull Tracy L, Shaffer Virginia O, Morris Arden M, Dietz David W, Wexner Steven D, Wick Elizabeth C
Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.
Inspira Health, Rowan University School of Medicine, Vineland, NJ.
Surgery. 2024 Apr;175(4):1007-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.12.005. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
Significant variation in rectal cancer care has been demonstrated in the United States. The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer was established in 2017 to improve the quality of rectal cancer care through standardization and emphasis on a multidisciplinary approach. The aim of this study was to understand the perceived value and barriers to achieving the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation.
An electronic survey was developed, piloted, and distributed to rectal cancer programs that had already achieved or were interested in pursuing the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation. The survey contained 40 questions with a combination of Likert scale, multiple choice, and open-ended questions to provide comments. This was a mixed methods study; descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data, and thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data.
A total of 85 rectal cancer programs were sent the survey (22 accredited, 63 interested). Responses were received from 14 accredited programs and 41 interested programs. Most respondents were program directors (31%) and program coordinators (40%). The highest-ranked responses regarding the value of the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation included "improved quality and culture of rectal cancer care," "enhanced program organization and coordination," and "challenges our program to provide optimal, high-quality care." The most frequently cited barriers to the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation were cost and lack of personnel.
Our survey found significant perceived value in the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation. Adhering to standards and a multidisciplinary approach to rectal cancer care are critical components of a high-quality care rectal cancer program.
美国已证实直肠癌护理存在显著差异。2017年设立了直肠癌国家认证计划,旨在通过标准化和强调多学科方法来提高直肠癌护理质量。本研究的目的是了解直肠癌国家认证计划认证的感知价值和实现该认证的障碍。
开发了一项电子调查问卷,进行了预试验,并分发给已获得或有意寻求直肠癌国家认证计划认证的直肠癌项目。该调查问卷包含40个问题,包括李克特量表、多项选择题和开放式问题以提供评论。这是一项混合方法研究;描述性统计用于分析定量数据,主题分析用于分析定性数据。
共向85个直肠癌项目发送了调查问卷(22个已获认证,63个感兴趣)。收到了14个已获认证项目和41个感兴趣项目的回复。大多数受访者是项目主任(31%)和项目协调员(40%)。关于直肠癌国家认证计划认证价值的排名最高的回复包括“改善直肠癌护理质量和文化”、“加强项目组织与协调”以及“促使我们的项目提供最佳、高质量护理”。直肠癌国家认证计划认证最常被提及的障碍是成本和人员短缺。
我们的调查发现直肠癌国家认证计划认证具有显著的感知价值。坚持标准和采用多学科方法进行直肠癌护理是高质量直肠癌护理项目的关键组成部分。