• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康干预措施可能对健康和经济公平产生不同的影响:以加纳社区高血压改善项目为例。

Health Interventions May Have Divergent Impacts on Health and Economic Equity: A Case Study of the Community-Based Hypertension Improvement Project in Ghana.

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 90 Smith St, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 May;22(3):353-362. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00871-7. Epub 2024 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-024-00871-7
PMID:38267804
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Improving health and economic equity are key objectives in priority setting, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. This study aims to assess the distributional impacts of the Community-based Hypertension Improvement Project (ComHIP) on health and economic outcomes across wealth quintiles in Ghana.

METHODS

We developed a decision analytical model to simulate a 30 million cohort of Ghanaians aged 15-49 years. The study specified health outcomes as the prevention of stroke cases and averting deaths among those with hypertension. Furthermore, we explored economic impacts, including savings in out-of-pocket costs for stroke patients and government spending. Financial risk protection against catastrophic and impoverishing health expenditures was also examined. We assessed these outcomes across wealth quintiles, and the corresponding concentration indexes (CIXs) were determined.

RESULTS

It was estimated that ComHIP could prevent 1450 stroke cases and 564 related deaths annually. Health benefits were observed to be more significant among the wealthier quintiles (CIX 0.217), mainly attributed to a higher occurrence of hypertension within these groups. ComHIP was also projected to result in an annual saving of USD 49,885 in individuals' out-of-pocket costs (CIX 0.262) and USD 37,578 in government spending (CIX 0.146). These savings correspond to the prevention of 335 catastrophic health expenditure cases (CIX - 0.239) and 11 impoverishing health expenditure cases (CIX - 0.600).

CONCLUSIONS

While ComHIP provides greater health benefits to wealthier groups, it offers substantial financial risk protection for the less wealthy. This study highlights the importance of considering equity in both health and financial risk when making priority-setting decisions.

摘要

背景和目的

在优先事项设定中,提高健康水平和经济公平性是关键目标,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。本研究旨在评估基于社区的高血压改善项目(ComHIP)对加纳不同财富五分位数人群的健康和经济结果的分配影响。

方法

我们开发了一个决策分析模型,以模拟一个 3000 万加纳 15-49 岁人群的队列。该研究将健康结果具体定义为预防中风病例和避免高血压患者死亡。此外,我们还探讨了经济影响,包括中风患者自付费用的节省和政府支出。还考察了对灾难性和致贫性卫生支出的财务风险保护。我们评估了这些结果在不同财富五分位数中的情况,并确定了相应的集中指数(CIX)。

结果

估计 ComHIP 每年可预防 1450 例中风病例和 564 例相关死亡。在较富裕的五分位数中,健康益处更为显著(CIX 0.217),这主要归因于这些群体中高血压的发生率更高。ComHIP 还预计每年将为个人自付费用节省 49885 美元(CIX 0.262),为政府支出节省 37578 美元(CIX 0.146)。这些节省相当于预防 335 例灾难性卫生支出病例(CIX -0.239)和 11 例致贫性卫生支出病例(CIX -0.600)。

结论

虽然 ComHIP 为较富裕群体提供了更大的健康益处,但它为较不富裕的群体提供了大量的财务风险保护。本研究强调了在制定优先事项决策时,既要考虑健康公平性,也要考虑财务风险公平性。

相似文献

1
Health Interventions May Have Divergent Impacts on Health and Economic Equity: A Case Study of the Community-Based Hypertension Improvement Project in Ghana.健康干预措施可能对健康和经济公平产生不同的影响:以加纳社区高血压改善项目为例。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 May;22(3):353-362. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00871-7. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
2
Out-of-pocket expenditure for hypertension care: a population-based study in low-income urban Medellin, Colombia.高血压治疗的自付费用:哥伦比亚麦德林低收入城市的一项基于人群的研究。
Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1806527. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1806527.
3
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a community-based hypertension improvement project in Ghana: a qualitative study of ComHIP.加纳社区高血压改善项目实施的障碍和促进因素:ComHIP 的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4774-x.
4
Effects of public financing of essential maternal and child health interventions across wealth quintiles in Nigeria: an extended cost-effectiveness analysis.尼日利亚不同财富五分位数人群基本母婴健康干预措施的公共融资效果:一项扩展的成本效益分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Apr;11(4):e597-e605. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00056-6.
5
Assessing catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment in adult asthma care: a cross-sectional study of patients attending six public health clinics in Klang District, Malaysia.评估成人哮喘护理中的灾难性卫生支出和贫困状况:对马来西亚巴生地区六家公立卫生诊所的患者进行的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10731-8.
6
Assessing the impoverishing effects, and factors associated with the incidence of catastrophic health care payments in Kenya.评估肯尼亚灾难性医疗支出的致贫影响及相关因素。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Feb 6;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0526-x.
7
Health system challenges to hypertension and related non-communicable diseases prevention and treatment: perspectives from Ghanaian stakeholders.高血压和相关非传染性疾病防治给卫生系统带来的挑战:加纳利益攸关方的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4571-6.
8
Who benefits most from extending financial protection for cataract surgery in Vietnam? An extended cost-effectiveness analysis of small incision surgery.谁能从越南扩大白内障手术财政保障中获益最多?小切口手术的扩展成本效益分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2020 May 1;35(4):399-407. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz181.
9
Association of Out-of-Pocket Annual Health Expenditures With Financial Hardship in Low-Income Adults With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the United States.美国患有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的低收入成年人中,年度自付医疗费用与经济困难的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;3(8):729-738. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1813.
10
Economic Burden of Chronic Ill Health and Injuries for Households in Low- and Middle-Income Countries低收入和中等收入国家家庭慢性疾病和伤害的经济负担

本文引用的文献

1
Prioritizing Quality Measures in Acute Stroke Care : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.优先考虑急性脑卒中护理的质量措施:成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2023 May;176(5):649-657. doi: 10.7326/M22-3186. Epub 2023 May 2.
2
Equitable Prioritization of Health Interventions by Incorporating Financial Risk Protection Weights Into Economic Evaluations.通过将金融风险保护权重纳入经济评估实现卫生干预措施的公平优先排序。
Value Health. 2023 Mar;26(3):411-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
3
Cost-effectiveness of a Community-based Hypertension Improvement Project (ComHIP) in Ghana: results from a modelling study.
加纳社区高血压改善项目(ComHIP)的成本效益:一项建模研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 2;11(9):e039594. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039594.
4
Examining Equity Effects of Health Interventions in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: A Systematic Review.卫生干预措施成本效果分析中的公平性效应评估:系统综述。
Value Health. 2021 Jan;24(1):136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
5
Vicious cycle of chronic disease and poverty: a qualitative study in present day Nepal.慢性病与贫困的恶性循环:当今尼泊尔的一项定性研究。
Int Health. 2021 Jan 14;13(1):30-38. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa016.
6
A Community-Based Intervention for Managing Hypertension in Rural South Asia.基于社区的南亚农村地区高血压管理干预措施。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):717-726. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911965.
7
Health system challenges to hypertension and related non-communicable diseases prevention and treatment: perspectives from Ghanaian stakeholders.高血压和相关非传染性疾病防治给卫生系统带来的挑战:加纳利益攸关方的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4571-6.
8
Can a nurse-led community-based model of hypertension care improve hypertension control in Ghana? Results from the ComHIP cohort study.以护士为主导的社区高血压管理模式能否改善加纳的高血压控制状况?来自 ComHIP 队列研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 2;9(4):e026799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026799.
9
Trends in cardiovascular diseases and associated risks in sub-Saharan Africa: a review of the evidence for Ghana, Nigeria, South Africa, Sudan and Tanzania.撒哈拉以南非洲地区心血管疾病及相关风险趋势:加纳、尼日利亚、南非、苏丹和坦桑尼亚的证据综述。
Aging Male. 2019 Sep;22(3):169-176. doi: 10.1080/13685538.2019.1582621. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
10
Modelling the impact of a tax on sweetened beverages in the Philippines: an extended cost-effectiveness analysis.对菲律宾含糖饮料征税影响的建模:一项扩展的成本效益分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):97-107. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.219980. Epub 2018 Dec 5.