• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对菲律宾含糖饮料征税影响的建模:一项扩展的成本效益分析。

Modelling the impact of a tax on sweetened beverages in the Philippines: an extended cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, United States of America (USA).

International Development Division, Abt Associates Inc., 6130 Executive Blvd, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):97-107. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.219980. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

DOI:10.2471/BLT.18.219980
PMID:30728616
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6357567/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the potential impact of a new tax on sweetened beverages on premature deaths associated with noncommunicable diseases in the Philippines.

METHODS

In January 2018, the Philippines began imposing a tax of 6 Philippine pesos per litre (around 13%) on sweetened beverages to curb the obesity burden. Using national data sources, we conducted an extended cost-effectiveness analysis to estimate the effect of the tax on the numbers of premature deaths averted attributed to type 2 diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease and stroke, across income quintiles over the period 2018-2037. We also estimated the financial benefits of the tax from reductions in out-of-pocket payments, direct medical costs averted and government health-care cost savings.

FINDINGS

The tax could avert an estimated 5913 deaths related to diabetes, 10 339 deaths from ischaemic heart disease and 7950 deaths from stroke over 20 years. The largest number of deaths averted could be among the fourth and fifth (highest) income quintiles. The tax could generate total health-care savings of 31.6 billion Philippine pesos (627 million United States dollars, US$) over 20 years, and raise 41.0 billion Philippine pesos (US$ 813 million) in revenue per annum. The poorest quintile could bear the smallest tax burden increase (14% of the additional tax; 5.6 billion Philippine pesos) and have the lowest savings in out-of-pocket payments due to relatively large health-care subsidies. Finally, we estimated that 13 890 cases of catastrophic expenditure could be averted.

CONCLUSION

The new sweetened beverage tax may help to reduce obesity-related premature deaths and improve financial well-being in the Philippines.

摘要

目的

评估对菲律宾含糖饮料征收新税对与非传染性疾病相关的过早死亡的潜在影响。

方法

2018 年 1 月,菲律宾开始对含糖饮料征收每升 6 菲律宾比索(约 13%)的税,以遏制肥胖负担。我们利用国家数据源进行了扩展成本效益分析,以估计该税收对 2018-2037 年间 5 个收入五分位数中因 2 型糖尿病、缺血性心脏病和中风而避免的过早死亡人数的影响。我们还估计了税收从减少自付费用、避免的直接医疗费用和政府医疗保健节省中获得的经济利益。

发现

该税收可在 20 年内避免约 5913 例与糖尿病相关的死亡、10339 例缺血性心脏病死亡和 7950 例中风死亡。避免的死亡人数最多的可能是第四和第五(最高)收入五分位数。该税收可在 20 年内产生 316 亿菲律宾比索(6.27 亿美元)的总医疗保健储蓄,并每年产生 410 亿菲律宾比索(8.13 亿美元)的税收收入。最贫困的五分位数可能承担最小的税收负担增加(额外税收的 14%;56 亿菲律宾比索),由于相对较大的医疗保健补贴,自付费用的节省最低。最后,我们估计可以避免 13890 例灾难性支出。

结论

新的含糖饮料税可能有助于减少与肥胖相关的过早死亡,并改善菲律宾的财务状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf68/6357567/a04b2ee58717/BLT.18.219980-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf68/6357567/dfa903d3f402/BLT.18.219980-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf68/6357567/9357c949b6de/BLT.18.219980-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf68/6357567/01694ad4ec0e/BLT.18.219980-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf68/6357567/a04b2ee58717/BLT.18.219980-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf68/6357567/dfa903d3f402/BLT.18.219980-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf68/6357567/9357c949b6de/BLT.18.219980-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf68/6357567/01694ad4ec0e/BLT.18.219980-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf68/6357567/a04b2ee58717/BLT.18.219980-F4.jpg

相似文献

1
Modelling the impact of a tax on sweetened beverages in the Philippines: an extended cost-effectiveness analysis.对菲律宾含糖饮料征税影响的建模:一项扩展的成本效益分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):97-107. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.219980. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
2
The distributional impact of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: findings from an extended cost-effectiveness analysis in South Africa.对含糖饮料征税的分配影响:南非一项扩展成本效益分析的结果
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Aug 21;4(4):e001317. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001317. eCollection 2019.
3
Development of a sweetened beverage tax, Philippines.菲律宾含糖饮料税的制定。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):154-159. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.220459. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
4
Cost Effectiveness of a Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Excise Tax in the U.S.美国含糖饮料消费税的成本效益
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):112-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.004.
5
Modelled health benefits of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in Australia: A cost-effectiveness and equity analysis.澳大利亚不同社会经济群体中含糖饮料税的模拟健康效益:成本效益与公平性分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 27;14(6):e1002326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002326. eCollection 2017 Jun.
6
Modelling the potential impact of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax on stroke mortality, costs and health-adjusted life years in South Africa.模拟南非含糖饮料税对中风死亡率、成本及健康调整生命年的潜在影响。
BMC Public Health. 2016 May 31;16:405. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3085-y.
7
The health and financial impacts of a sugary drink tax across different income groups in Canada.加拿大含糖饮料税对不同收入群体的健康和经济影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 Aug;38:100869. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100869. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
8
Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Volume, Tiered, and Absolute Sugar Content Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policies in the United States: A Microsimulation Study.美国基于容积、分级和绝对含糖量的含糖饮料税收政策对健康的影响和成本效益:一项微观模拟研究。
Circulation. 2020 Aug 11;142(6):523-534. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042956. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
9
Simulating the impact on health of internalising the cost of carbon in food prices combined with a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages.模拟食品价格中纳入碳成本以及对含糖饮料征税对健康的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 3;16:107. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2723-8.
10
Projected Impact of Mexico's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policy on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Modeling Study.墨西哥含糖饮料税政策对糖尿病和心血管疾病的预计影响:一项建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 1;13(11):e1002158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002158. eCollection 2016 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling and empirical evidence of the impact of implementation of sugar sweetened-beverages tax to reduce non-communicable diseases prevalence: a systematic review.实施含糖饮料税以降低非传染性疾病患病率影响的建模与实证证据:一项系统综述
Front Nutr. 2024 Oct 11;11:1448300. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1448300. eCollection 2024.
2
Modelling the potential impact of a tax on fruit juice in South Africa: implications for the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes and health financing.模拟南非对果汁征税的潜在影响:对2型糖尿病一级预防和卫生筹资的启示
BMC Nutr. 2024 Oct 25;10(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s40795-024-00941-y.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Distributional health and financial benefits of increased tobacco taxes in Colombia: results from a modelling study.提高哥伦比亚烟草税对健康和财政的影响:模型研究结果。
Tob Control. 2019 Jul;28(4):374-380. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054378. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
2
Accelerating the Worldwide Adoption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes: Strengthening Commitment and Capacity Comment on "The Untapped Power of Soda Taxes: Incentivizing Consumers, Generating Revenue, and Altering Corporate Behavior".加速全球范围内含糖饮料税的采用:加强承诺和能力 评“苏打税的未开发潜力:激励消费者、创造收入和改变企业行为”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 May 1;7(5):474-478. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.127.
3
Global health 2050: the path to halving premature death by mid-century.
《2050年全球健康:到本世纪中叶将过早死亡人数减半的路径》
Lancet. 2024 Oct 19;404(10462):1561-1614. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01439-9. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
4
Effectiveness of implemented global dietary interventions: a scoping review of fiscal policies.实施全球饮食干预措施的效果:财政政策的范围界定综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2552. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19988-4.
5
Strengthening Public Financing of Primary Healthcare in India: A Perspective.加强印度初级医疗保健的公共融资:一种视角。
Health Serv Insights. 2024 May 10;17:11786329241249289. doi: 10.1177/11786329241249289. eCollection 2024.
6
Economic priorities over population health: A political dilemma in addressing noncommunicable diseases in developing countries.经济优先于人口健康:发展中国家应对非传染性疾病中的政治困境。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 18;7(3):e1974. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1974. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Health Interventions May Have Divergent Impacts on Health and Economic Equity: A Case Study of the Community-Based Hypertension Improvement Project in Ghana.健康干预措施可能对健康和经济公平产生不同的影响:以加纳社区高血压改善项目为例。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 May;22(3):353-362. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00871-7. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
8
2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.2024 年心脏病与中风统计数据:美国心脏协会发布的美国和全球数据报告。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):e347-e913. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
9
Cost-effectiveness of non-communicable disease prevention in Southeast Asia: a scoping review.东南亚非传染性疾病预防的成本效益:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 9;11:1206213. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1206213. eCollection 2023.
10
Considerations for modelling a broad food tax in the Philippines and other low-income and middle-income countries.菲律宾及其他低收入和中等收入国家制定广泛食品税政策的考虑因素。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012068.
Investing in non-communicable disease prevention and management to advance the Sustainable Development Goals.
投资于非传染性疾病的预防和管理,以推进可持续发展目标。
Lancet. 2018 May 19;391(10134):2029-2035. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30667-6. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
4
Equity impacts of price policies to promote healthy behaviours.促进健康行为的价格政策的公平性影响。
Lancet. 2018 May 19;391(10134):2059-2070. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30531-2. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
5
Taxes for health: evidence clears the air.健康税:证据拨开迷雾。
Lancet. 2018 May 19;391(10134):1974-1976. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30629-9. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
6
The impact of sugared drink taxation and industry response.含糖饮料税的影响及行业回应。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Jan;2(1):e2-e3. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30039-1. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
7
Pass-Through of a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages at the Philadelphia International Airport.费城国际机场对含糖饮料征税的转嫁情况。
JAMA. 2018 Jan 16;319(3):305-306. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.16903.
8
The Untapped Power of Soda Taxes: Incentivizing Consumers, Generating Revenue, and Altering Corporate Behavior.苏打税的未开发潜力:激励消费者、增加收入和改变企业行为。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Sep 1;6(9):489-493. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.69.
9
Health impact assessment of the UK soft drinks industry levy: a comparative risk assessment modelling study.英国软饮料行业征税的健康影响评估:一项比较风险评估建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2016 Dec 16;2(1):e15-e22. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30037-8. eCollection 2017 Jan.
10
Modelled health benefits of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in Australia: A cost-effectiveness and equity analysis.澳大利亚不同社会经济群体中含糖饮料税的模拟健康效益:成本效益与公平性分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 27;14(6):e1002326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002326. eCollection 2017 Jun.