Giossi Riccardo, Pani Arianna, Schroeder Jan, Scaglione Francesco
Chemical-Clinical Analyses Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 15;10(1):e23725. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23725. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
Benralizumab, mepolizumab, and reslizumab are novel monoclonal antibodies approved for asthma, targeting eosinophilic inflammation. Benralizumab is directed against IL-5 receptor (IL-5R), while mepolizumab and reslizumab are directed against IL-5. The three drugs cause a reduction in eosinophils, but benralizumab also causes a cytotoxic effect on eosinophils and basophils. Recently, it has been reported that suboptimal responders to benralizumab presented exacerbations associated with concomitant infections and sputum neutrophilia and the incidence of infections was greater in patients receiving benralizumab compared to mepolizumab and reslizumab. For this reason, we wanted to explore potential differences in terms of infectious adverse events between the three different -IL-5 antibodies.
We performed a rapid systematic review on PubMed up to April 28, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating benralizumab, mepolizumab, or reslizumab in patients with asthma. Included outcomes were the reporting of any respiratory tract infection and any emergency department (ED) or hospital admission for infection or asthma exacerbation. A Mantel-Haenszel meta-analysis was performed with Cochrane RevMan 5.4 to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). A subgroup analysis for the different active treatments was performed.
From 163 references we included 21 studies reporting the results of 23 different RCTs for a total population of 9156 patients. All studies compared -IL-5 antibodies against placebo. -IL-5 treatment resulted in non-significant differences compared to placebo in the odds for nasopharyngitis (OR = 0.90; 95 % CI from 0.76 to 1.07), pharyngitis (OR = 1.45; 95 % CI from 0.92 to 2.28), upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) (OR = 0.97; 95 % CI from 0.82 to 1.15), rhinitis (OR = 1.01; 95 % CI from 0.71 to 1.44), pneumonia (OR = 0.56; 95 % CI from 0.10 to 2.01), and influenza (OR = 0.84; 95 % CI from 0.65 to 1.09). We observed significant reductions in the reporting of sinusitis (OR = 0.75; 95 % CI from 0.53 to 1.06), bronchitis (OR = 0.71; 95 % CI from 0.59 to 0.86), and ED or hospital admission due to asthma exacerbation for overall -IL-5 antibodies compared to placebo (OR = 0.59; 95 % CI from 0.40 to 0.88). We were not able to discriminate whether exacerbations were associated with infections or to increased sputum eosinophilia. From the subgroup analysis, we observed differences in directions and magnitudes of the effect size in the reporting of some events. Benralizumab was associated with increased odds of pharyngitis (OR = 1.56; 95 % CI from 0.97 to 2.52) and a similar trend was observed for mepolizumab in the reporting of rhinitis (OR = 1.85; 95 % CI from 0.72 to 4.78), both non-statistically significant. In terms of effect size, benralizumab also showed higher odds for bronchitis and pneumonia in comparison to mepolizumab and reslizumab (OR = 0.76, OR = 0.69, and OR = 0.60 for bronchitis and OR = 0.80, OR = 0.20, and OR = 0.45, respectively, all non-significant).
-IL-5 treatments might have different effects on the reporting of some infection events in patients with asthma. However, the evidence is limited by sample size and far than conclusive and suggest the need of future studies to evaluate the risk of infections in patients with asthma receiving -IL-5 treatments.
贝那利珠单抗、美泊利珠单抗和瑞利珠单抗是获批用于治疗哮喘的新型单克隆抗体,靶向嗜酸性粒细胞炎症。贝那利珠单抗靶向白细胞介素-5受体(IL-5R),而美泊利珠单抗和瑞利珠单抗靶向白细胞介素-5。这三种药物均可使嗜酸性粒细胞减少,但贝那利珠单抗还对嗜酸性粒细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞具有细胞毒性作用。最近有报道称,对贝那利珠单抗反应欠佳的患者会出现与合并感染及痰液嗜中性粒细胞增多相关的病情加重,且与接受美泊利珠单抗和瑞利珠单抗治疗的患者相比,接受贝那利珠单抗治疗的患者感染发生率更高。因此,我们想探究这三种不同的白细胞介素-5抗体在感染性不良事件方面的潜在差异。
我们截至2022年4月28日在PubMed上进行了快速系统评价。我们纳入了评估贝那利珠单抗、美泊利珠单抗或瑞利珠单抗治疗哮喘患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入的结局指标为任何呼吸道感染的报告以及因感染或哮喘加重而前往急诊科(ED)就诊或住院的情况。使用Cochrane RevMan 5.4进行Mantel-Haenszel荟萃分析,以估计合并比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。对不同的活性治疗进行了亚组分析。
从163篇参考文献中,我们纳入了21项研究,这些研究报告了23项不同RCT的结果,涉及的患者总数为9156例。所有研究均将白细胞介素-5抗体与安慰剂进行了比较。与安慰剂相比,白细胞介素-5治疗在鼻咽炎(OR = 0.90;95% CI为0.76至1.07)、咽炎(OR = 1.45;95% CI为0.92至2.28)、上呼吸道感染(URTI)(OR = 0.97;95% CI为0.82至1.15)、鼻炎(OR = 1.01;95% CI为0.71至1.44)、肺炎(OR = 0.56;95% CI为0.10至2.01)和流感(OR = 0.84;95% CI为0.65至1.09)的发生率方面无显著差异。与安慰剂相比,我们观察到在总体白细胞介素-5抗体治疗组中,鼻窦炎(OR = 0.75;95% CI为0.53至1.06)、支气管炎(OR = 0.71;95% CI为0.59至0.86)以及因哮喘加重而前往急诊科就诊或住院的报告显著减少(OR = 0.59;95% CI为0.40至0.88)。我们无法区分病情加重是否与感染或痰液嗜酸性粒细胞增多有关。从亚组分析中,我们观察到在某些事件的报告中,效应大小的方向和幅度存在差异。贝那利珠单抗与咽炎发生率增加相关(OR = 1.56;95% CI为0.97至2.52),美泊利珠单抗在鼻炎报告方面也观察到类似趋势(OR = 1.85;95% CI为0.72至4.78),两者均无统计学意义。在效应大小方面,与美泊利珠单抗和瑞利珠单抗相比,贝那利珠单抗在支气管炎和肺炎方面的发生率也更高(支气管炎的OR分别为0.76、0.69和0.60,肺炎的OR分别为0.80、0.20和0.45,均无统计学意义)。
白细胞介素-5治疗可能对哮喘患者某些感染事件的报告有不同影响。然而,证据受样本量限制,远非结论性的,提示需要未来的研究来评估接受白细胞介素-5治疗的哮喘患者的感染风险。