Fernandez Daniela, Orazzo Emily, Fry Emma, McMain Alice, Ryan Michelle K, Wong Chuk Yan, Begeny Christopher T
Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Global Institute for Women's Leadership, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 10;14:1235065. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1235065. eCollection 2023.
Research about the experiences of underrepresented groups in higher education (HE) demonstrates the persistence of challenges, despite policies and institutional strategies to promote inclusion. Diversity and inclusion policies have been part of the HE agenda for several decades, yet most policies and interventions focus on (a) a given, isolated identity experience (e.g., based solely on gender, social class, or ethnicity) rather than more intersectional approaches to identity; and (b) top-down interventions that do not include participants insights in their design. In this paper, we report a case study of a workshop with students at an elite university that drew on an intersectional approach to social identities (IASI), specifically, looking at gender and social class. We explore three key themes: (a) the importance of group processes, (b) the use of visual techniques, and (c) the institutional tensions and the (de)politicisation of social psychology research. Reflecting on this case study we argue that approaches to identity and inclusion in HE can benefit from intersectionality beyond the use of multi and overlapping identity and social group categories. We argue that research in this space is not neutral and needs to acknowledge researchers' position about (a) inclusion and diversity, (b) perceptions of participants in research, and (c) the motivation and aims of institutions where the research is conducted. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of integrating an intersectional approach within social identity research in HE when focusing on underrepresented groups.
关于高等教育(HE)中代表性不足群体经历的研究表明,尽管有促进包容性的政策和机构战略,但挑战依然存在。几十年来,多样性和包容性政策一直是高等教育议程的一部分,但大多数政策和干预措施侧重于:(a)特定的、孤立的身份经历(例如,仅基于性别、社会阶层或种族),而不是更具交叉性的身份认同方法;以及(b)自上而下的干预措施,在设计过程中没有纳入参与者的见解。在本文中,我们报告了一项针对一所精英大学学生的研讨会的案例研究,该研讨会采用了社会身份交叉性方法(IASI),具体而言,关注性别和社会阶层。我们探讨了三个关键主题:(a)群体过程的重要性,(b)视觉技术的使用,以及(c)机构间的紧张关系以及社会心理学研究的(去)政治化。通过对这个案例研究的反思,我们认为,高等教育中身份认同和包容性的方法可以从交叉性中受益,而不仅仅是使用多重和重叠的身份及社会群体类别。我们认为,这一领域的研究并非中立,需要承认研究人员在以下方面的立场:(a)包容性和多样性,(b)对研究参与者的看法,以及(c)进行研究的机构的动机和目标。最后,我们讨论了在关注代表性不足群体时,将交叉性方法纳入高等教育社会身份研究的理论和实践意义。