Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2299195. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2299195. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
Psychological first aid (PFA) training helps to prepare healthcare workers (HCWs) to manage trauma and stress during healthcare emergencies, yet evidence regarding its effectiveness and implementation is lacking. A two-arm feasibility randomized controlled trial design was conducted in a Chinese tertiary hospital. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either a culturally adapted PFA training (the intervention arm) or psychoeducation (the control arm). Feasibility indicators and selected outcomes were collected. In total, 215 workers who expressed an interest in participating in the trial were screened for eligibility, resulting in 96 eligible participants being randomly allocated to the intervention arm ( = 48) and control arm ( = 48). There was a higher retention rate for the face-to-face PFA training session than for the four online group PFA sessions. Participants rated the PFA training as very helpful (86%), with a satisfaction rate of 74.25%, and 47% reported being able to apply their PFA skills in responding to public health emergencies or providing front-line clinical care. Positive outcome changes were observed in PFA knowledge, skills, attitudes, resilience, self-efficacy, compassion satisfaction, and post-traumatic growth. Their scores on depression, anxiety, stress, and burnout measures all declined. Most of these changes were sustained over 3 months ( < .05). Repeated measures analysis of variance found statistically significant interaction effects on depression ( = 2.874, = .046, = .031) and burnout ( = 3.729, = .018, = .037), indicating a greater reduction in symptoms of depression and burnout with PFA compared to psychoeducation training. This culturally adapted PFA training intervention was highly acceptable among Chinese HCWs and was feasible in a front-line care setting. Preliminary findings indicated positive changes for the PFA training intervention on knowledge, skills, attitudes, resilience, self-efficacy, compassion satisfaction, and post-traumatic growth, especially a reduction of depression and burnout. Further modifications are recommended and a fully powered evaluation of PFA training is warranted.
心理急救(PFA)培训有助于使医护人员(HCWs)做好准备,以在医疗保健紧急情况下应对创伤和压力,但关于其有效性和实施情况的证据尚不足。本研究采用两臂可行性随机对照试验设计,在中国一家三级医院开展。参与者被随机分配接受文化适应性 PFA 培训(干预组)或心理教育(对照组)。收集可行性指标和部分结果。共有 215 名对参加试验感兴趣的工作人员接受了资格筛选,结果有 96 名符合条件的参与者被随机分配到干预组(n=48)和对照组(n=48)。面对面 PFA 培训课程的保留率高于四场在线小组 PFA 课程。参与者对 PFA 培训评价非常有帮助(86%),满意度为 74.25%,47%的人报告能够将其 PFA 技能应用于应对公共卫生紧急情况或提供一线临床护理。PFA 知识、技能、态度、韧性、自我效能感、同情满足感和创伤后成长方面观察到积极的结果变化。他们在抑郁、焦虑、压力和倦怠方面的评分均下降。这些变化大多在 3 个月后仍然持续( < .05)。重复测量方差分析发现抑郁( = 2.874, = .046, = .031)和倦怠( = 3.729, = .018, = .037)方面存在统计学上显著的交互效应,表明与心理教育培训相比,PFA 培训可更大程度地减轻抑郁和倦怠症状。这种文化适应性 PFA 培训干预措施在中国 HCWs 中具有较高的可接受性,在一线护理环境中具有可行性。初步研究结果表明,PFA 培训干预在知识、技能、态度、韧性、自我效能感、同情满足感和创伤后成长方面具有积极变化,尤其是降低了抑郁和倦怠。建议进一步修改,并需要对 PFA 培训进行全面评估。