Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Hosp Infect. 2024 Mar;145:142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.01.006. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
A recent study confirmed significant contamination of syringe tips following routine anaesthesia practice of at least 6 h in duration.
We assessed the relative efficacy of clinically relevant syringe tip disinfection techniques following contamination with the hyper transmissible and more pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 5 (S. aureus ST5) strain characteristic associated with increased strength of biofilm formation and greater desiccation tolerance.
Syringe tips (N=40) contaminated with S. aureus ST5 were randomized to 70% isopropyl pads with 10 or 60 s of drying time, scrubbing alcohol disinfection caps with 10 or 60 s of dwell time, or to non-scrubbing alcohol disinfection caps with 60 s of dwell time. The primary outcome was residual 24-h colony forming units (cfu) >10.
Scrubbing disinfection caps were more effective than alcohol pads (25% (12/48) <10 cfu for scrubbing caps (10- or 60-s dwell times) vs 0% (0/48) <10 cfu for alcohol pads (10 or 60 s of drying time), Holm-Sidak adjusted P=0.0016). Scrubbing disinfection caps were more effective than non-scrubbing alcohol disinfection caps (25% (12/48) <10 cfu for scrubbing alcohol caps (10- or 60-s dwell times) vs 2% (1/48) for non-scrubbing alcohol caps (60-s dwell time), adjusted P=0.0087).
Scrubbing alcohol caps are more effective than alcohol pads or non-scrubbing disinfecting caps for microbial reduction of syringe tips contaminated with the more pathogenic S. aureus ST5.
最近的一项研究证实,在至少 6 小时的常规麻醉实践后,注射器尖端会受到明显污染。
我们评估了在污染了更具传染性和致病性更强的金黄色葡萄球菌 5 型序列型(金黄色葡萄球菌 ST5)菌株后,以下临床相关的注射器尖端消毒技术的相对效果,这种菌株与更强的生物膜形成能力和更强的干燥耐受性有关。
将金黄色葡萄球菌 ST5 污染的注射器尖端(N=40)随机分为 70%异丙醇垫,干燥时间为 10 秒或 60 秒,擦拭酒精消毒帽,停留时间为 10 秒或 60 秒,或非擦拭酒精消毒帽,停留时间为 60 秒。主要结果是 24 小时残留菌落形成单位(cfu)>10。
擦拭消毒帽比酒精垫更有效(25%(12/48)<10 cfu 用于擦拭帽(10 或 60 秒停留时间),而 0%(0/48)<10 cfu 用于酒精垫(10 或 60 秒干燥时间),Holm-Sidak 调整后 P=0.0016)。擦拭消毒帽比非擦拭酒精消毒帽更有效(25%(12/48)<10 cfu 用于擦拭酒精帽(10 或 60 秒停留时间),而 2%(1/48)用于非擦拭酒精帽(60 秒停留时间),调整后 P=0.0087)。
与酒精垫或非擦拭消毒帽相比,擦拭酒精帽更能有效减少金黄色葡萄球菌 ST5 污染的注射器尖端的微生物。