• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术时间越长,外科医生手部受污染的程度会越高吗?

Do Longer Surgical Procedures Result in Greater Contamination of Surgeons' Hands?

作者信息

Hosseini Pooria, Mundis Gregory M, Eastlack Robert, Nourian Allen, Pawelek Jeff, Nguyen Stacie, Akbarnia Behrooz A

机构信息

San Diego Center for Spinal Disorders, 6190 Cornerstone Court, Suite 212, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA.

Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1707-13. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4832-1. Epub 2016 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11999-016-4832-1
PMID:27090260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4887375/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A surgical site infection is a substantial cause of complications in patients. Different methods are being used to decrease surgical site infections; however, these infections still can cause complications, especially in patients undergoing longer operations (> 3 hours). There is evidence that the efficacy of the scrubbing material fades after 3 hours. However, we do not know the longevity of hand cleanliness after application of scrubbing materials in a long operation. It can be postulated that if the surgeon's scrubbed hands are recolonized after a certain time, they may serve as a progressive source of contamination during surgery.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Is there a correlation between surgical duration and hand contamination at the end of surgery? (2) At what point during surgery does hand contamination reach or exceed prescrub levels?

METHODS

Three spine surgeons using the same scrubbing technique and materials consisting of chlorhexidine gluconate 1% solution and ethyl alcohol 61% w/w were enrolled in our study. Between December 2014 and April 2015, spine procedures of 3 hours or more, which were the first case of the day, were selected for this study (20 cases). Cases in which glove changing occurred (perforations, reprepping, and redraping) or cultures obtained after scrubbing were positive (indicative of insufficient hand sanitization) were excluded (0% of cases). Twenty cases (100% enrollment) were analyzed. Surgeons' hands were swabbed with sterile cotton tip applicators and 5 mL sterile phosphate-buffered saline before hand scrubbing (prescrub), immediately after hand scrubbing (postscrub), and immediately after surgery (postoperative). Results were reported in colony-forming units per milliliter. The correlation between duration of surgery and hand recontamination was tested by regression analysis of time versus colony-forming units per milliliter. Receiver-operating characteristic curve tested the cutoff point, where recontamination occurred.

RESULTS

With a longer duration of surgery, more colony-forming units are recovered from gloved hands at the end of surgery (R = 0.94, R(2) = 0.89, p = 0.005). The receiver-operating characteristic curve suggested that 5 hours is the cutoff point for hand recolonization. At 5 hours, contamination reached or exceeded prescrub levels (area under the curve, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.23-1.0), whereas before 5 hours, there was no contamination detected at the end of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that duration of surgery correlates with hand recontamination and at 5 hours, recolonization of a surgeon's hands become detectable. Recolonization may have started even earlier than 5 hours. However, these levels are not detectable in the laboratory at earlier times.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Based on this pilot study, rescrubbing is highly recommended before the fifth hour of an operation, ideally at some point between the fourth and fifth hours.

FUTURE

We also recommend the surgical site infection rates in operations using rescrubbing should be compared with those from surgeries with just the conventional single-scrubbing technique, in a randomized controlled trial, to determine the effectiveness of this novel rescrubbing method.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染是患者并发症的一个重要原因。目前正在使用不同的方法来减少手术部位感染;然而,这些感染仍然可能导致并发症,尤其是在手术时间较长(>3小时)的患者中。有证据表明,擦洗材料的功效在3小时后会减弱。然而,我们不知道在长时间手术中使用擦洗材料后手部清洁的持续时间。可以推测,如果外科医生擦洗后的手在一定时间后重新被细菌定植,它们可能在手术过程中成为渐进性的污染源。

问题/目的:我们提出以下问题:(1)手术持续时间与手术结束时手部污染之间是否存在相关性?(2)手术过程中手部污染在何时达到或超过术前水平?

方法

三名采用相同擦洗技术和材料(1%葡萄糖酸氯己定溶液和61%w/w乙醇)的脊柱外科医生参与了我们的研究。在2014年12月至2015年4月期间,选择当天第一例手术时间为3小时或更长时间的脊柱手术(20例)进行本研究。排除发生手套更换(穿孔、重新准备和重新铺巾)或擦洗后培养结果为阳性(表明手部消毒不充分)的病例(0%的病例)。对20例(100%纳入)进行分析。在术前(术前擦洗前)、刚完成手部擦洗后(术后擦洗)和手术结束后(术后),用无菌棉拭子和5mL无菌磷酸盐缓冲盐水擦拭外科医生的手。结果以每毫升菌落形成单位报告。通过时间与每毫升菌落形成单位的回归分析来测试手术持续时间与手部再次污染之间的相关性。采用受试者操作特征曲线来测试再次污染发生的临界点。

结果

随着手术时间的延长,手术结束时从戴手套的手中回收的菌落形成单位更多(R = 0.94,R² = 0.89,p = 0.005)。受试者操作特征曲线表明5小时是手部重新定植的临界点。在5小时时,污染达到或超过术前水平(曲线下面积,0.66;95%可信区间,0.23 - 1.0),而在5小时之前,手术结束时未检测到污染。

结论

我们的结果表明,手术持续时间与手部再次污染相关,在5小时时,外科医生的手开始重新被细菌定植。重新定植可能甚至在5小时之前就已经开始。然而,在更早的时间在实验室中无法检测到这些水平。

临床意义

基于这项初步研究,强烈建议在手术的第五小时之前重新进行擦洗,理想情况是在第四和第五小时之间的某个时间点。

未来

我们还建议在一项随机对照试验中,将采用重新擦洗的手术中的手术部位感染率与仅采用传统单次擦洗技术的手术中的感染率进行比较,以确定这种新型重新擦洗方法的有效性。

相似文献

1
Do Longer Surgical Procedures Result in Greater Contamination of Surgeons' Hands?手术时间越长,外科医生手部受污染的程度会越高吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1707-13. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4832-1. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
2
Preoperative Hand Decontamination in Ophthalmic Surgery: A Comparison of the Removal of Bacteria from Surgeons' Hands by Routine Antimicrobial Scrub versus an Alcoholic Hand Rub.眼科手术中的术前手部消毒:常规抗菌擦洗与酒精擦手对手术医生手部细菌清除效果的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2017 Sep;42(9):1333-1337. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2017.1304559. Epub 2017 May 30.
3
Hand washing rituals in trauma theatre: clean or dirty?创伤手术室中的洗手规程:清洁还是污染?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 Jan;88(1):13-5. doi: 10.1308/003588406X83032.
4
Evaluation of surgical scrub methods for large animal surgeons.大型动物外科医生手术刷手法的评估
Vet Surg. 1997 Sep-Oct;26(5):382-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1997.tb01697.x.
5
Population kinetics of the skin flora on gloved hands following surgical hand disinfection with 3 propanol-based hand rubs: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.使用三种基于丙醇的手消毒剂进行外科手消毒后戴手套手上皮肤菌群的群体动力学:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;28(3):346-50. doi: 10.1086/510865. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
6
A new surgical handwashing and hand antisepsis from scrubbing to rubbing.一种从刷洗到手揉搓的新型外科洗手和手部消毒方法。
J Nippon Med Sch. 2004 Jun;71(3):190-7. doi: 10.1272/jnms.71.190.
7
Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of povidone-iodine, povidone-iodine-ethanol and chlorhexidine gluconate-ethanol surgical scrubs.聚维酮碘、聚维酮碘 - 乙醇及葡萄糖酸氯己定 - 乙醇外科洗手剂抗菌效果的比较
Dermatology. 2006;212 Suppl 1:21-5. doi: 10.1159/000089195.
8
Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection.外科手消毒以减少手术部位感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD004288. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004288.pub2.
9
An evaluation of five protocols for surgical handwashing in relation to skin condition and microbial counts.关于皮肤状况和微生物计数对五种外科洗手方案的评估。
J Hosp Infect. 1997 May;36(1):49-65. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(97)90090-6.
10
Hand-rubbing with an aqueous alcoholic solution vs traditional surgical hand-scrubbing and 30-day surgical site infection rates: a randomized equivalence study.使用含酒精水溶液进行手部揉搓与传统外科洗手及30天手术部位感染率的比较:一项随机等效性研究
JAMA. 2002 Aug 14;288(6):722-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.6.722.

引用本文的文献

1
Which Surgical Hand Preparation Method Is More Effective? A Comparative Study of Hand Rub and Hand Scrub.哪种外科洗手准备方法更有效?手部揉搓与手部刷洗的比较研究。
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(7):242. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15070242.
2
Postoperative Surgical Site Infections in Spine Surgery: Can the Duration of Surgery Predict the Pathogen Spectrum?脊柱手术后手术部位感染:手术时间能否预测病原体谱?
In Vivo. 2023 Jul-Aug;37(4):1688-1693. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13255.
3
Sterility of Miniature C-arm Fluoroscopy in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery.小型C形臂荧光透视在手部及上肢手术中的无菌性
J Hand Microsurg. 2020 Jul 26;14(2):153-159. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714434. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Comparison of Clinical Data Between Patients With Complications and Without Complications After Spinal Tuberculosis Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.脊柱结核手术后有并发症与无并发症患者的临床资料比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 29;9:815303. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.815303. eCollection 2022.
5
Reducing Surgical Site Infection in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery: A Multidisciplinary Improvement Program and Prospective 4-Year Audit.降低小儿脊柱侧弯手术部位感染率:一项多学科改进计划及为期4年的前瞻性审计
Global Spine J. 2020 Aug;10(5):633-639. doi: 10.1177/2192568219868200. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
6
Prevention of Prosthetic Joint Infection: From Traditional Approaches towards Quality Improvement and Data Mining.人工关节感染的预防:从传统方法到质量改进与数据挖掘
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 11;9(7):2190. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072190.
7
Operative Field Debris Often Rises to the Level of the Surgeon's Face Shield During Spine Surgery: Are Orthopedic Space Suits a Reasonable Solution?脊柱手术期间,术野碎片常常会升至外科医生面罩的高度:骨科太空服是一个合理的解决方案吗?
Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Dec 31;13(6):501-506. doi: 10.14444/6067. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Prevention of fracture-related infection: a multidisciplinary care package.预防骨折相关感染:多学科护理方案。
Int Orthop. 2017 Dec;41(12):2457-2469. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3607-y. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
9
Letter to the Editor: Do Longer Surgical Procedures Result in Greater Contamination of Surgeons' Hands?致编辑的信:手术时间越长,外科医生手部的污染就越严重吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Sep;474(9):2071-2. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4942-9. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative spinal wound infections.术后脊柱伤口感染
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008 Jun;16(6):330-7. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200806000-00005.
2
Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery.脊柱手术后感染的危险因素。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 15;30(12):1460-5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166532.58227.4f.
3
Surgical hand disinfection with a propanol-based hand rub: equivalence of shorter application times.使用基于丙醇的手消毒剂进行外科手消毒:较短涂抹时间的等效性
J Hosp Infect. 2005 Apr;59(4):304-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.09.022.
4
Postoperative wound infections of the spine.脊柱术后伤口感染
Neurosurg Focus. 2003 Sep 15;15(3):E14. doi: 10.3171/foc.2003.15.3.14.
5
Ignaz Semmelweis and the birth of infection control.伊格纳兹·塞麦尔维斯与感染控制的诞生。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Jun;13(3):233-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.3.233.
6
Pseudomonas surgical-site infections linked to a healthcare worker with onychomycosis.与一名患有甲癣的医护人员相关的假单胞菌手术部位感染。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 Oct;24(10):749-52. doi: 10.1086/502125.
7
Outbreak of sternal surgical site infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa traced to a scrub nurse with onychomycosis.一起由铜绿假单胞菌引起的胸骨手术部位感染暴发事件,感染源追溯至一名患有甲癣的刷手护士。
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Aug 1;33(3):317-23. doi: 10.1086/321890. Epub 2001 Jul 5.
8
Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.《手术部位感染预防指南,1999》。医院感染控制实践咨询委员会。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;20(4):250-78; quiz 279-80. doi: 10.1086/501620.
9
Surgical glove failures in clinical practice settings.临床实践环境中的手术手套故障。
AORN J. 1997 Oct;66(4):660-8, 671, 673. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62919-0.
10
Management of postoperative infections after spinal instrumentation.脊柱内固定术后感染的管理。
J Neurosurg. 1997 Jun;86(6):975-80. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.6.0975.