Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Jan;30(1):e17080. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17080.
Identifying controls on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, and where SOC is most vulnerable to loss, are essential to managing soils for both climate change mitigation and global food security. However, we currently lack a comprehensive understanding of the global drivers of SOC storage, especially with regards to particulate (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC). To better understand hierarchical controls on POC and MAOC, we applied path analyses to SOC fractions, climate (i.e., mean annual temperature [MAT] and mean annual precipitation minus potential evapotranspiration [MAP-PET]), carbon (C) input (i.e., net primary production [NPP]), and soil property data synthesized from 72 published studies, along with data we generated from the National Ecological Observatory Network soil pits (n = 901 total observations). To assess the utility of investigating POC and MAOC separately in understanding SOC storage controls, we then compared these results with another path analysis predicting bulk SOC storage. We found that POC storage is negatively related to MAT and soil pH, while MAOC storage is positively related to NPP and MAP-PET, but negatively related to soil % sand. Our path analysis predicting bulk SOC revealed similar trends but explained less variation in C storage than our POC and MAOC analyses. Given that temperature and pH impose constraints on microbial decomposition, this indicates that POC is primarily controlled by SOC loss processes. In contrast, strong relationships with variables related to plant productivity constraints, moisture, and mineral surface availability for sorption indicate that MAOC is primarily controlled by climate-driven variations in C inputs to the soil, as well as C stabilization mechanisms. Altogether, these results demonstrate that global POC and MAOC storage are controlled by separate environmental variables, further justifying the need to quantify and model these C fractions separately to assess and forecast the responses of SOC storage to global change.
确定土壤有机碳(SOC)储存的控制因素,以及 SOC 最容易流失的地方,对于管理土壤以实现气候变化缓解和全球粮食安全至关重要。然而,我们目前缺乏对 SOC 储存的全球驱动因素的全面理解,特别是在颗粒态有机碳(POC)和矿物结合有机碳(MAOC)方面。为了更好地理解 POC 和 MAOC 的层次控制因素,我们应用路径分析方法研究了 SOC 各组分、气候(即年均温度 [MAT] 和年均降水量减去潜在蒸散量 [MAP-PET])、碳(C)输入(即净初级生产力 [NPP])以及从 72 篇已发表研究中综合得出的土壤性质数据,同时还利用了我们从国家生态观测网络土壤坑中获得的数据(总观测值为 901 个)。为了评估分别研究 POC 和 MAOC 对理解 SOC 储存控制因素的有用性,我们将这些结果与另一个预测 bulk SOC 储存的路径分析进行了比较。我们发现,POC 储存与 MAT 和土壤 pH 呈负相关,而 MAOC 储存与 NPP 和 MAP-PET 呈正相关,但与土壤 %砂含量呈负相关。我们预测 bulk SOC 的路径分析揭示了类似的趋势,但对 C 储存的解释比 POC 和 MAOC 分析要少。鉴于温度和 pH 对微生物分解施加了限制,这表明 POC 主要受 SOC 损失过程的控制。相比之下,与植物生产力限制、水分和矿物表面吸附可用性等变量的强烈关系表明,MAOC 主要受气候驱动的土壤 C 输入变化以及 C 稳定机制的控制。总的来说,这些结果表明,全球 POC 和 MAOC 储存受到不同环境变量的控制,进一步证明需要分别量化和模拟这些 C 组分,以评估和预测 SOC 储存对全球变化的响应。