Suppr超能文献

微创外科手术对采用肝外Glissonean入路的解剖性肝段切除术的影响。

Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery on Anatomic Liver Segmentectomy Using the Extrahepatic Glissonean Approach.

作者信息

Kato Yutaro, Sugioka Atsushi, Kojima Masayuki, Uyama Ichiro

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya 454-8509, Japan.

Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Jan 20;14(1):120. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010120.

Abstract

Accurate minimally invasive anatomic liver (sub)segmentectomy (MIAS) is technically demanding and not yet standardized, and its surgical outcomes are undefined. To study the impact of the minimally invasive approach on perioperative outcomes of anatomic liver (sub)segmentectomy (AS), we retrospectively studied and compared perioperative outcomes of 99 open AS (OAS) and 112 MIAS (laparoscopic 77, robotic 35) cases using the extrahepatic Glissonean approach, based on the 1:1 propensity score matched analyses. After matching (71:71), MIAS was superior to OAS in terms of blood loss ( < 0.0001), maximum postoperative serum total bilirubin ( < 0.0001), C-reactive protein ( = 0.034) levels, R0 resection rate ( = 0.021), bile leak ( = 0.049), and length of hospital stay ( < 0.0001). The matched robotic and laparoscopic AS groups (30:30) had comparable outcomes in terms of operative time, blood loss, transfusion, open conversion, postoperative morbidity and mortality, R0 resection, and hospital stay, although the rate of Pringle maneuver application ( = 0.0002) and the postoperative aspartate aminotransferase level ( = 0.002) were higher in the robotic group. Comparing the matched posterosuperior (sub)segmentectomy cases or unmatched repeat hepatectomy cases between MIAS and OAS, we observed significantly less blood loss and shorter hospital stays in MIAS. Robotic AS yielded comparable outcomes with laparoscopic AS in the posterosuperior (sub)segmentectomy and repeat hepatectomy settings, despite the worse tumor and procedural backgrounds in robotic AS. In conclusion, various types of MIAS standardized by the extrahepatic Glissonean approach were feasible and safe with more favorable perioperative outcomes than those of OAS. Although robotic AS had almost comparable outcomes with laparoscopic AS, robotics may serve to decrease the surgical difficulty of MIAS in selected patients undergoing posterosuperior (sub)segmentectomy and repeat hepatectomy.

摘要

精确的微创解剖性肝(亚)段切除术(MIAS)技术要求高且尚未标准化,其手术效果也不明确。为研究微创方法对解剖性肝(亚)段切除术(AS)围手术期结果的影响,我们基于1:1倾向评分匹配分析,回顾性研究并比较了99例开放性AS(OAS)和112例MIAS(腹腔镜手术77例,机器人手术35例)病例的围手术期结果。匹配后(71:71),MIAS在失血量(<0.0001)、术后最高血清总胆红素水平(<0.0001)、C反应蛋白水平(=0.034)、R0切除率(=0.021)、胆漏(=0.049)和住院时间(<0.0001)方面均优于OAS。匹配的机器人手术和腹腔镜AS组(30:30)在手术时间、失血量、输血、中转开腹、术后发病率和死亡率、R0切除以及住院时间方面结果相当,尽管机器人手术组的Pringle手法应用率(=0.0002)和术后天冬氨酸转氨酶水平(=0.002)较高。比较MIAS和OAS中匹配的后上(亚)段切除术病例或未匹配的再次肝切除术病例,我们发现MIAS的失血量明显更少,住院时间更短。在进行后上(亚)段切除术和再次肝切除术时,尽管机器人手术AS的肿瘤和手术背景较差,但机器人手术AS与腹腔镜手术AS的结果相当。总之,通过肝外Glissonean入路标准化的各种类型的MIAS是可行且安全的,围手术期结果比OAS更有利。尽管机器人手术AS与腹腔镜手术AS的结果几乎相当,但机器人手术可能有助于降低接受后上(亚)段切除术和再次肝切除术的特定患者的MIAS手术难度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f644/10820587/6f5dbafffab7/jpm-14-00120-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验