Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Solid Tumor Molecular Pathology Laboratory, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Pathol Res Pract. 2024 Feb;254:155142. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155142. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
Identifying biomarkers for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is an unmet need in actual immunotherapy era. Available data regarding chromosome 3p genes (i.e., VHL, PBRM1, SETD2) mutations as potential predictors for therapy response is conflicting. We describe the impact of these mutations on clinical outcomes in mRCC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-doublet or ICI/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations.
We performed a single-center retrospective analysis on mRCC patients treated with first line ICI/ICI or ICI/TKI. A multi-gene panel was used, allowing the amplification of 841 amplicons (54.93 kb, human reference sequence hg19/GRCh37) in the coding sequences of the following genes: ATM, BAP1, KDM5C, MET, MTOR, NF2, PBRM1, PIK3CA, PTEN, SETD2, SMARCB1, TP53, TSC1, TSC2, VHL.
18 patients undergoing ICI/ICI and ICI/TKI who had tumor tissue adequate for molecular analysis were included. Histology was 100% clear cell. IMDC risk was 50% intermediate, 33.4% good, 16.6% poor. First line therapy was 89% ICI/TKI, 11% ICI/ICI. 83.3% pts (n = 15) carried genomic alterations (GA). Most common GA included VHL in 44% (n = 8; 7 pathogenic - PAT and 1 variant of unknown significance - VUS), PBRM1 in 44% (n = 8; 5 PAT and 3 VUS) and SETD2 in 33% (n = 6; 4 PAT and 2 VUS). With the limit of a small sample that did not allow proper statistical analyses, SETD2-mutated patients had lower median progression free (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) than non-SETD2 mutated patients. Higher mPFS and mOS were shown with VHL or PBRM1 GA, especially in PBRM1 +VHL mutated pts.
Our data shows a possible negative predictive role of SETD2 GA for ICI-based therapy in RCC. Concomitant VHL and PBRM1 GA could act as a predictor for ICI/TKI efficacy. Our hypothesis-generating analysis highlights the need of an integrated evaluation of these genes as promising biomarkers in RCC. Further larger studies are required.
在实际的免疫治疗时代,鉴定转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的生物标志物是未满足的需求。关于染色体 3p 基因(即 VHL、PBRM1、SETD2)突变作为潜在治疗反应预测因子的可用数据存在冲突。我们描述了这些突变对接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)双药或 ICI/酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)联合治疗的 mRCC 患者的临床结局的影响。
我们对接受一线 ICI/ICI 或 ICI/TKI 治疗的 mRCC 患者进行了单中心回顾性分析。使用了一种多基因panel,允许在以下基因的编码序列中扩增 841 个扩增子(54.93 kb,人类参考序列 hg19/GRCh37):ATM、BAP1、KDM5C、MET、MTOR、NF2、PBRM1、PIK3CA、PTEN、SETD2、SMARCB1、TP53、TSC1、TSC2、VHL。
共纳入 18 例接受 ICI/ICI 和 ICI/TKI 治疗且肿瘤组织有足够分子分析的患者。组织学 100%为透明细胞。IMDC 风险为 50%中危、33.4%低危、16.6%高危。一线治疗为 89%ICI/TKI,11%ICI/ICI。83.3%(n=15)的患者携带基因组改变(GA)。最常见的 GA 包括 VHL 占 44%(n=8;7 个致病性-PAT 和 1 个意义不明的变异-VUS)、PBRM1 占 44%(n=8;5 个 PAT 和 3 个 VUS)和 SETD2 占 33%(n=6;4 个 PAT 和 2 个 VUS)。由于样本量小,不允许进行适当的统计学分析,与非 SETD2 突变患者相比,SETD2 突变患者的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)和总生存期(mOS)更低。VHL 或 PBRM1 GA 显示出更高的 mPFS 和 mOS,尤其是在 PBRM1+VHL 突变患者中。
我们的数据显示 SETD2 GA 可能对 RCC 的基于 ICI 的治疗具有负预测作用。同时存在 VHL 和 PBRM1 GA 可能作为 ICI/TKI 疗效的预测因子。我们的假设生成分析强调需要对这些基因进行综合评估,作为 RCC 有前途的生物标志物。需要进一步进行更大规模的研究。