Suppr超能文献

转移性肾细胞癌的一线治疗:疗效和安全性的倾向评分匹配比较。

First-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of efficacy and safety.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2024 Nov;42(11):374.e21-374.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.013. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy is a standard systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although differential pharmacologic action between ICI+ICI and ICI+tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations may affect outcomes, comparative studies using real-world data are few.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 447 mRCC patients treated with 1st-line ICI-based combinations at multiple institutions between January 2018 and August 2023, and selected 320 patients diagnosed with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) for further study. Cohorts were matched using one-to-one propensity scores based on IMDC risk classification. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), and treatment-related adverse events (TrAE) were compared.

RESULTS

The matching process yielded 228 metastatic ccRCC patients treated with ICI+ICI (n = 114) or ICI+TKI (n = 114). Median OS was 53 months (95%CI: 33-NA) in patients treated with ICI+ICI and was not reached (95%CI: 43-NA) with ICI+TKI (P = 0.24). Median PFS was significantly shorter for ICI+ICI (13 months, 95%CI: 7-25) than for ICI+TKI (25 months, 95%CI: 13-NA) (P = 0.047). There were no differences in second-line PFS for sequential therapy after 1st-line combinations of ICI+ICI or ICI+TKI (6 vs. 8 months, P = 0.6). There were no differences in ORR between the 2 groups (ICI+ICI: 51% vs. ICI+TKI: 55%, P = 0.8); the progressive disease (PD) rate was significantly higher in patients treated with the ICI+ICI combination (24% vs. 11%, P = 0.029). The rate of any grade TrAE was significantly higher in patients treated with ICI+TKI (71% vs. 85%, P = 0.016), but we found no differences in severe TrAE between the 2 groups (39% vs. 36%, P = 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

In a matched cohort of real-world data, we confirmed comparable OS benefits between ICI+ICI and ICI+TKI combinations. However, differential clinical behaviors in terms of PFS, PD rates, and TrAE between ICI-based combinations may enrich clinical decision-making.

摘要

目的

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)为基础的联合治疗是转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的标准系统治疗方法。尽管 ICI+ICI 和 ICI+酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)组合之间的差异药理作用可能会影响结果,但使用真实世界数据进行的比较研究很少。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月期间,447 名在多个机构接受一线 ICI 为基础的组合治疗的 mRCC 患者的记录,并选择了 320 名被诊断为透明细胞 RCC(ccRCC)的患者进行进一步研究。使用基于 IMDC 风险分类的一对一倾向评分匹配队列。比较总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和治疗相关不良事件(TrAE)。

结果

匹配过程产生了 228 名接受 ICI+ICI(n=114)或 ICI+TKI(n=114)治疗的转移性 ccRCC 患者。ICI+ICI 治疗的患者中位 OS 为 53 个月(95%CI:33-NR),ICI+TKI 治疗的患者未达到(95%CI:43-NR)(P=0.24)。ICI+ICI 的中位 PFS 明显短于 ICI+TKI(13 个月,95%CI:7-25 个月)(P=0.047)。在接受 ICI+ICI 或 ICI+TKI 一线治疗后,序贯治疗的二线 PFS 无差异(6 个月 vs. 8 个月,P=0.6)。两组间 ORR 无差异(ICI+ICI:51% vs. ICI+TKI:55%,P=0.8);ICI+ICI 联合治疗组的疾病进展(PD)率明显较高(24% vs. 11%,P=0.029)。ICI+TKI 治疗组任何级别的 TrAE 发生率明显较高(71% vs. 85%,P=0.016),但两组严重 TrAE 发生率无差异(39% vs. 36%,P=0.8)。

结论

在真实世界数据的匹配队列中,我们证实了 ICI+ICI 和 ICI+TKI 组合之间具有相当的 OS 获益。然而,基于 ICI 的组合在 PFS、PD 率和 TrAE 方面的临床行为差异可能会丰富临床决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验