Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Urol Oncol. 2024 Nov;42(11):374.e21-374.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.013. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy is a standard systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although differential pharmacologic action between ICI+ICI and ICI+tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations may affect outcomes, comparative studies using real-world data are few.
We retrospectively analyzed the records of 447 mRCC patients treated with 1st-line ICI-based combinations at multiple institutions between January 2018 and August 2023, and selected 320 patients diagnosed with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) for further study. Cohorts were matched using one-to-one propensity scores based on IMDC risk classification. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), and treatment-related adverse events (TrAE) were compared.
The matching process yielded 228 metastatic ccRCC patients treated with ICI+ICI (n = 114) or ICI+TKI (n = 114). Median OS was 53 months (95%CI: 33-NA) in patients treated with ICI+ICI and was not reached (95%CI: 43-NA) with ICI+TKI (P = 0.24). Median PFS was significantly shorter for ICI+ICI (13 months, 95%CI: 7-25) than for ICI+TKI (25 months, 95%CI: 13-NA) (P = 0.047). There were no differences in second-line PFS for sequential therapy after 1st-line combinations of ICI+ICI or ICI+TKI (6 vs. 8 months, P = 0.6). There were no differences in ORR between the 2 groups (ICI+ICI: 51% vs. ICI+TKI: 55%, P = 0.8); the progressive disease (PD) rate was significantly higher in patients treated with the ICI+ICI combination (24% vs. 11%, P = 0.029). The rate of any grade TrAE was significantly higher in patients treated with ICI+TKI (71% vs. 85%, P = 0.016), but we found no differences in severe TrAE between the 2 groups (39% vs. 36%, P = 0.8).
In a matched cohort of real-world data, we confirmed comparable OS benefits between ICI+ICI and ICI+TKI combinations. However, differential clinical behaviors in terms of PFS, PD rates, and TrAE between ICI-based combinations may enrich clinical decision-making.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)为基础的联合治疗是转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的标准系统治疗方法。尽管 ICI+ICI 和 ICI+酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)组合之间的差异药理作用可能会影响结果,但使用真实世界数据进行的比较研究很少。
我们回顾性分析了 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月期间,447 名在多个机构接受一线 ICI 为基础的组合治疗的 mRCC 患者的记录,并选择了 320 名被诊断为透明细胞 RCC(ccRCC)的患者进行进一步研究。使用基于 IMDC 风险分类的一对一倾向评分匹配队列。比较总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和治疗相关不良事件(TrAE)。
匹配过程产生了 228 名接受 ICI+ICI(n=114)或 ICI+TKI(n=114)治疗的转移性 ccRCC 患者。ICI+ICI 治疗的患者中位 OS 为 53 个月(95%CI:33-NR),ICI+TKI 治疗的患者未达到(95%CI:43-NR)(P=0.24)。ICI+ICI 的中位 PFS 明显短于 ICI+TKI(13 个月,95%CI:7-25 个月)(P=0.047)。在接受 ICI+ICI 或 ICI+TKI 一线治疗后,序贯治疗的二线 PFS 无差异(6 个月 vs. 8 个月,P=0.6)。两组间 ORR 无差异(ICI+ICI:51% vs. ICI+TKI:55%,P=0.8);ICI+ICI 联合治疗组的疾病进展(PD)率明显较高(24% vs. 11%,P=0.029)。ICI+TKI 治疗组任何级别的 TrAE 发生率明显较高(71% vs. 85%,P=0.016),但两组严重 TrAE 发生率无差异(39% vs. 36%,P=0.8)。
在真实世界数据的匹配队列中,我们证实了 ICI+ICI 和 ICI+TKI 组合之间具有相当的 OS 获益。然而,基于 ICI 的组合在 PFS、PD 率和 TrAE 方面的临床行为差异可能会丰富临床决策。