Haller Julia A, Tomaiuolo Maurizio, Lucas Mary M, Yang Christopher C, Hyman Leslie
Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Vickie and Jack Farber Vision Research Center, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Ophthalmology, Sidney Kimmel Medical Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2024 Jul;8(7):657-665. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.01.017. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
Investigate disparities in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) presentation and initiation of anti-VEGF treatment.
Retrospective cohort study.
Patients in the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry database (2015-2021) with branch or central RVO and macular edema (ME).
The association of demographic characteristics and presenting visual acuity (VA) with anti-VEGF treatment initiation were quantified using multivariable logistic regression.
Treatment with ≥ 1 anti-VEGF injection within 12 months after RVO diagnosis.
A total of 304 558 eligible patients with RVO and ME were identified. Age at presentation varied by race, ethnicity, sex, and RVO type (all P values < 0.001). Within the first year after RVO presentation, 192 602 (63.2%) patients received ≥ 1 anti-VEGF injection. In a multivariable regression model adjusting for relevant covariates, female (vs. male) patients had lower odds of receiving injections (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.96; P < 0.0001) as did Black/African American (vs. White) patients (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.92; P < 0.0001) and Asian (vs. White) patients (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99; P = 0.02), whereas older patients (vs. patients aged < 51 years) had higher odds (61-70 years: OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.16-1.24; 71-80 years: OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.16-1.24; > 80 years: OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.11-1.18; all P values < 0.0001). Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic) patients had a small increased odds of treatment initiation (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.11; P < 0.0001). Results were similar in the subset of 226 143 patients with VA data. In this subset, patients with presenting VA < 20/40 to 20/200 were most frequently treated in the first year after diagnosis (∼ 70%) and patients with light perception/no light perception (LP-NLP) vision or VA of 20/20 or better were treated least frequently (36.9% and 41.9%, respectively).
In this large national clinical registry, 37% of RVO patients with ME had no anti-VEGF treatment documented in the first year after diagnosis. Black/African American, Asian, and female patients and patients with VA of LP-NLP were least likely to receive treatment. Awareness of this undertreatment and these disparities highlight the need for initiatives to ensure all RVO patients receive timely anti-VEGF injections for optimized visual outcomes.
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
调查视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)的表现及抗VEGF治疗起始情况的差异。
回顾性队列研究。
美国眼科学会IRIS®(视力智能研究)注册数据库(2015 - 2021年)中患有分支或中央RVO及黄斑水肿(ME)的患者。
采用多变量逻辑回归分析人口统计学特征和初始视力(VA)与抗VEGF治疗起始之间的关联。
RVO诊断后12个月内接受≥1次抗VEGF注射治疗。
共识别出304558例符合条件的RVO和ME患者。就诊时的年龄因种族、族裔、性别和RVO类型而异(所有P值<0.001)。在RVO发病后的第一年内,192602例(63.2%)患者接受了≥1次抗VEGF注射。在调整了相关协变量的多变量回归模型中,女性(与男性相比)患者接受注射的几率较低(优势比[OR],0.95;95%置信区间[CI],0.93 - 0.96;P<0.0001),黑人/非裔美国人(与白人相比)患者(OR,0.90;95%CI,0.88 - 0.92;P<0.0001)和亚洲人(与白人相比)患者(OR,0.95;95%CI,0.91 - 0.99;P = 0.02)也是如此,而老年患者(与年龄<51岁的患者相比)接受治疗的几率更高(61 - 70岁:OR,1.20;95%CI,1.16 - 1.24;71 - 80岁:OR,1.20;95%CI,1.16 - 1.24;>80岁:OR,1.15;95%CI,1.11 - 1.18;所有P值<0.0001)。西班牙裔(与非西班牙裔相比)患者治疗起始的几率略有增加(OR,1.08;95%CI,1.04 - 1.11;P<0.0001)。在有VA数据的226143例患者亚组中结果相似。在该亚组中,初始视力<20/40至20/200的患者在诊断后的第一年内接受治疗的频率最高(约70%),而仅有光感/无光感(LP - NLP)视力或视力为20/20或更好的患者接受治疗的频率最低(分别为36.9%和41.9%)。
在这个大型国家临床注册研究中,37%的患有ME的RVO患者在诊断后的第一年内没有抗VEGF治疗记录。黑人/非裔美国人、亚洲人、女性患者以及有LP - NLP视力的患者接受治疗的可能性最小。认识到这种治疗不足和这些差异凸显了采取措施确保所有RVO患者及时接受抗VEGF注射以获得最佳视力结果的必要性。
在本文末尾的脚注和披露中可能会找到专有或商业披露信息。