Yang Ru, Chen Zhongshan, Pan Jin, Yang Shimin, Hu Fubi
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, No.278, Baoguang Road, Xindu District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd., No.2258, Chengbei Road, Shanghai, China.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Apr;107:130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.01.013. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of T1ρ dispersion and Gd-EOB-DTPAenhanced T1mapping in the identification of early liver fibrosis (LF) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) rabbit model induced by a high-fat diet using histopathological findings as the standard reference.
A total of sixty rabbits were randomly allocated into the standard control group (n = 12) and the NAFLD model groups (8 rabbits per group) corresponding to different high-fat high cholesterol diet feeding weeks. All rabbits underwent noncontrast transverse T1ρ mapping with varying spin-locking frequencies (FSL = 0 Hz and 500 Hz), native T1 mapping, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1 mapping during the hepatobiliary phase. The histopathological findings were assessed based on the NASH CRN Scoring System. Statistical analyses were conducted using the intraclass correlation coefficient, analysis of variance, multiple linear regression, and receiver operating characteristics.
Except for native T1, T1ρ, T1ρ dispersion, HBP T1, and △T1 values significantly differed among different liver fibrosis groups (F = 14.414, 18.736, 10.15, and 9.799, respectively; all P < 0.05). T1ρ, T1ρ dispersion, HBP T1, and △T1 values also exhibited significant differences among different NASH groups (F = 4.138, 4.594, 21.868, and 22.678, respectively; all P < 0.05). In the multiple regression analysis, liver fibrosis was the only factor that independently influenced T1ρ dispersion (R2 = 0.746, P = 0.000). Among all metrics, T1ρ dispersion demonstrated the best area under curve (AUC) for identifying early LF (≥ F1 stage) and significant LF (≥ F2 stage) (AUC, 0.849 and 0.916, respectively). The performance of △T1 and HBP T1 (AUC, 0.948 and 0.936, respectively) were better than that of T1ρ and T1ρ dispersion (AUC, 0.762 and 0.769, respectively) for diagnosing NASH.
T1⍴ dispersion may be suitable for detecting liver fibrosis in the complex background of NAFLD, while Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1 mapping is superior to nonenhanced T1⍴ mapping (T1⍴ and T1⍴ dispersion) for identifying NASH.
以组织病理学结果为标准参照,研究T1ρ弥散和钆塞酸二钠增强T1映射在高脂饮食诱导的非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)兔模型中识别早期肝纤维化(LF)和非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)的诊断效能。
将60只兔随机分为标准对照组(n = 12)和对应不同高脂高胆固醇饮食喂养周数的NAFLD模型组(每组8只兔)。所有兔在肝胆期接受不同自旋锁定频率(FSL = 0 Hz和500 Hz)的非增强横向T1ρ映射、平扫T1映射以及钆塞酸二钠增强T1映射。基于NASH CRN评分系统评估组织病理学结果。使用组内相关系数、方差分析、多元线性回归和受试者工作特征进行统计分析。
除平扫T1外,不同肝纤维化组之间的T1ρ、T1ρ弥散、HBP T1和△T1值存在显著差异(F分别为14.414、18.736、10.15和9.799;均P < 0.05)。不同NASH组之间的T1ρ、T1ρ弥散、HBP T1和△T1值也存在显著差异(F分别为4.138、4.594、21.868和22.678;均P < 0.05)。在多元回归分析中,肝纤维化是唯一独立影响T1ρ弥散的因素(R2 = 0.746,P = 0.000)。在所有指标中,T1ρ弥散在识别早期LF(≥F1期)和显著LF(≥F2期)方面显示出最佳曲线下面积(AUC)(AUC分别为0.849和0.916)。对于诊断NASH,△T1和HBP T1的性能(AUC分别为0.948和0.936)优于T1ρ和T1ρ弥散(AUC分别为0.762和0.769)。
T1ρ弥散可能适用于在NAFLD复杂背景下检测肝纤维化,而钆塞酸二钠增强T1映射在识别NASH方面优于非增强T1ρ映射(T1ρ和T1ρ弥散)。