Suppr超能文献

钆塞酸二钠增强T1ρ成像与扩散指标用于评估兔非酒精性脂肪性肝炎的肝脏炎症和早期纤维化

Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1ρ imaging vs diffusion metrics for assessment liver inflammation and early stage fibrosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in rabbits.

作者信息

Xie Yuanliang, Zhang Hongfeng, Jin Chaoling, Wang Xiang, Wang Xiaoqi, Chen Jingting, Xu Yikai

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, China; Department of Radiology, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430014, China.

Department of Pathology, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430014, China.

出版信息

Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 May;48:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.12.017. Epub 2017 Dec 24.

Abstract

To assess the value of T1ρ,T1ρ on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) and diffusion metrics in staging of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity scores, inflammation, fibrosis in NASH rabbits model. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) rabbits model was induced by feeding a varied duration of high-fat, high-cholesterol diet. T1ρ,T1ρ (HBP) 20min after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA, and Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging were performed on a 3.0T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging unit. The diagnostic value of each parameter for NAS, inflammation and fibrosis severity were determined. T1ρ (r=0.658) and T1ρ (HBP) (r=0.750) have strong association with NASH overall activity, T1ρ (HBP) is strongly relevant to inflammation stage (r=0.812). There was negative association between f and inflammation (r=-0.480), whilst no significant relation between other three parameters (apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) and true diffusion coefficient (D)) and inflammation or overall activity. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of f, ADC, T1ρ and T1ρ-HBP were 0.871, 0.728, 0.849 and 0.949 for differentiating NASH; 0.731, 0.552, 0.925 and 0.922 for G2-3 inflammation; and 0.767, 0.625, 0.816, and 0.882 for S1-2 fibrosis. Comparison of ROC curve showed T1ρ (HBP) had an optimal diagnostic performance for NASH [T1ρ (HBP) vs ADC, AUC:0.949 vs 0.728, P=0.043], inflammation [T1ρ (HBP) vs ADC, AUC:0.922 vs 0.552, P=0.003], fibrosis [T1ρ (HBP) vs ADC, AUC:0.882 vs 0.625, P=0.046]. The combination of T1ρ (HBP)+perfusion fraction (f) showed highest diagnostic value for NASH (AUC:0.971), inflammation (AUC:0.935). Among T1ρ imaging and IVIM diffusion metrics, combination of T1rho (HBP)+f was found to be superior noninvasive imaging biomarker for NASH activity assessment.

摘要

为评估T1ρ、肝胆期(HBP)的T1ρ以及扩散指标在非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)活动评分、炎症、NASH兔模型纤维化分期中的价值。通过喂养不同时长的高脂、高胆固醇饮食诱导非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)兔模型。在3.0T磁共振(MR)成像设备上进行T1ρ、静脉注射钆塞酸二钠(Gd-EOB-DTPA)20分钟后的T1ρ(HBP)以及体素内不相干运动成像(IVIM)扩散加权成像。确定每个参数对NAS、炎症和纤维化严重程度的诊断价值。T1ρ(r = 0.658)和T1ρ(HBP)(r = 0.750)与NASH总体活动密切相关,T1ρ(HBP)与炎症分期密切相关(r = 0.812)。f与炎症呈负相关(r = -0.480),而其他三个参数(表观扩散系数(ADC)、伪扩散系数(D*)和真扩散系数(D))与炎症或总体活动无显著关系。对于区分NASH,f、ADC、T1ρ和T1ρ-HBP的受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)分别为0.871、0.728、0.849和0.949;对于G2-3级炎症,分别为0.731、0.552、0.925和0.922;对于S1-2级纤维化,分别为0.767、0.625、0.816和0.882。ROC曲线比较显示,T1ρ(HBP)对NASH具有最佳诊断性能[T1ρ(HBP)与ADC比较,AUC:0.949对0.728,P = 0.043]、炎症[T1ρ(HBP)与ADC比较,AUC:0.922对0.552,P = 0.003]、纤维化[T1ρ(HBP)与ADC比较,AUC:0.882对0.625,P = 0.046]。T1ρ(HBP)+灌注分数(f)的组合对NASH(AUC:0.9

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验