Wu Xiaozheng, Li Wen, Luo Zhenliang, Chen Yunzhi
Department of Preclinical medicine, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, 510025, China.
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Jan 27;24(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-02861-w.
Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) of multiple drugs for Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis(IPF) have been reported and achieved a certain degree of efficacy, however, the difference in safety and efficacy of them for IPF is not yet well understood. The aim of this network meta-analysis is to assess their safety and efficacy in the treatment of IPF and differences in this safety and efficacy comprehensively.
The PubMed, EMbase, CENTRAL and MEDLINE were retrieved to find out the RCTs of drugs in the treatment of IPF. The retrieval date is from construction to November 10, 2022. Stata 14.0 and RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analysis.
CRD42023385689.
Twenty-four studies with a total of 6208 patients were finally included, including RCTs of 13 drugs. The results of safety showed that there' s no difference in the incidence of SAEs of 13 drugs treated with IPF compared to placebo (P>0.05), and it's also found that Warfarin had a higher all-cause mortality for IPF than placebo (OR = 5.63, 95% CI [1.54 to 20.55]). SUCRA' s scatterplot showed that Pirfenidone, Nintedanib, Sildenafil and Imatinib were lower than placebo, and Warfarin, Ambrisentan and N-acetylcysteine were higher than placebo. The results of effectiveness showed that Nintedanib (MD = -0.08, 95% CI [-0.12 to -0.04]) improved FVC (L)absolute change from baseline in patients better than placebo, and Nintedanib (OR=1.81, 95% CI [1.23 to 2.66]), Pirfenidone (OR=1.85, 95%CI [1.26 to 2.71]) and Pamrevlumab (OR=4.11, 95% CI [1.25 to 13.58]) improved the proportion of patients with a decline in FVC ≥10% predicted better than placebo. SUCRA' s scatterplot showed that Pamrevlumab, Pirfenidone and Nintedanib were lower than placebo, and Warfarin and Ambrisentan were higher than placebo.
Compared with other drugs, Nintedanib and Pirfenidone can significantly slow the decline of lung function in patients with IPF, and the safety is higher. Therefore, they can be further promoted in clinical practice. Warfarin and Ambrisentan shouldn't be used clinically for IPF as the safety and efficacy of them are poor compared to other drugs and placebo. Pamrevlumab may become important drugs for the treatment of IPF in the future.
已报道多种药物治疗特发性肺纤维化(IPF)的随机对照试验(RCT)并取得了一定疗效,然而,它们治疗IPF的安全性和疗效差异尚不清楚。本网状Meta分析的目的是全面评估它们治疗IPF的安全性、疗效及安全性和疗效差异。
检索PubMed、EMbase、CENTRAL和MEDLINE以查找药物治疗IPF的RCT。检索日期为建库至2022年11月10日。使用Stata 14.0和RevMan 5.3进行统计分析。
CRD42023385689。
最终纳入24项研究,共6208例患者,包括13种药物的RCT。安全性结果显示,13种药物治疗IPF的严重不良事件(SAEs)发生率与安慰剂相比无差异(P>0.05),还发现华法林治疗IPF的全因死亡率高于安慰剂(OR = 5.63,95%CI[1.54至20.55])。累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)散点图显示,吡非尼酮、尼达尼布、西地那非和伊马替尼低于安慰剂,而华法林、安立生坦和N-乙酰半胱氨酸高于安慰剂。有效性结果显示,尼达尼布(MD = -0.08,95%CI[-0.12至-0.04])改善患者用力肺活量(FVC)(L)较基线的绝对变化优于安慰剂,且尼达尼布(OR=1.81,95%CI[1.23至2.66])、吡非尼酮(OR=1.85,95%CI[1.26至2.71])和帕姆罗昔单抗(OR=4.11,95%CI[1.25至13.58])改善FVC下降≥预测值10%的患者比例优于安慰剂。SUCRA散点图显示,帕姆罗昔单抗、吡非尼酮和尼达尼布低于安慰剂,而华法林和安立生坦高于安慰剂。
与其他药物相比,尼达尼布和吡非尼酮可显著延缓IPF患者肺功能下降,且安全性更高。因此,它们可在临床实践中进一步推广。华法林和安立生坦因安全性和疗效较其他药物及安慰剂差,不应在临床上用于IPF。帕姆罗昔单抗未来可能成为治疗IPF的重要药物。