• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型药物与曲普坦类药物治疗偏头痛的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of New Pharmacologic Agents With Triptans for Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Kuang Tien General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Department of Nutrition, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128544. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28544.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28544
PMID:34633423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8506232/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

New therapeutic classes of migraine-specific treatment have been developed, including 5-hydroxytryptamine1F receptor agonists (lasmiditan) and calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists (rimegepant and ubrogepant).

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes associated with the use of lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant vs triptans for acute management of migraine headaches.

DATA SOURCES

The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and PubMed were searched from inception to March 5, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Double-blind randomized clinical trials examining current available migraine-specific acute treatments were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was applied to extract the data according to a predetermined list of variables of interest, and all network meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) for freedom from pain (hereafter referred to as pain freedom) at 2 hours after the dose, and the secondary outcomes were ORs for pain relief at 2 hours after the dose and any adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 64 randomized clinical trials were included (46 442 participants; 74%-87% women; age range, 36-43 years). Most of the included treatments were associated with reduced pain at 2 hours compared with placebo. Most triptans were associated with higher ORs for pain freedom at 2 hours compared with lasmiditan (range: OR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.06-2.80] to OR, 3.40 [95% CI, 2.12-5.44]), rimegepant (range: OR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.07-2.33] to OR, 3.13 [95% CI, 2.16-4.52]), and ubrogepant (range: OR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.00-2.37] to OR, 3.05 [95% CI, 2.02-4.60]). Most triptans were associated with higher ORs for pain relief at 2 hours compared with lasmiditan (range: OR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.09-1.96] to OR, 3.31 [95% CI, 2.41-4.55]), rimegepant (range: OR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.01-1.76] to OR, 3.01 [95% CI, 2.33-3.88]), and ubrogepant (range: OR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.02-1.88] to OR, 3.13 [95% CI, 2.35-4.15]). The comparisons between lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant were not statistically significant for both pain freedom and pain relief at 2 hours. Lasmiditan was associated with the highest risk of any adverse events, and certain triptans (rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan) were also associated with a higher risk of any adverse events than the calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

For pain freedom or pain relief at 2 hours after the dose, lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant were associated with higher ORs compared with placebo but lower ORs compared with most triptans. However, the lack of cardiovascular risks for these new classes of migraine-specific treatments may offer an alternative to triptans.

摘要

重要性

已经开发出了新的偏头痛特异性治疗类别的药物,包括 5-羟色胺 1F 受体激动剂(拉米替坦)和降钙素基因相关肽拮抗剂(rimegepant 和 ubrogepant)。

目的

比较拉米替坦、rimegepant 和 ubrogepant 与曲坦类药物用于偏头痛急性治疗的结果。

数据来源

从成立到 2020 年 3 月 5 日,在 Cochrane 对照试验注册库、Embase 和 PubMed 上进行了检索。

研究选择

纳入了关于当前可用的偏头痛特异性急性治疗的双盲随机临床试验。

数据提取和综合

按照预定的感兴趣变量列表,应用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南提取数据,所有网络荟萃分析均采用随机效应模型进行。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是剂量后 2 小时无疼痛(以下简称疼痛缓解)的优势比(OR),次要结果是剂量后 2 小时疼痛缓解的 OR 和任何不良事件。

结果

共纳入 64 项随机临床试验(46442 名参与者;74%-87%为女性;年龄范围 36-43 岁)。大多数纳入的治疗方法与安慰剂相比,在 2 小时内疼痛减轻。与拉米替坦相比,大多数曲坦类药物在 2 小时时疼痛缓解的 OR 更高(范围:OR,1.72[95%CI,1.06-2.80]至 OR,3.40[95%CI,2.12-5.44]),rimegepant(范围:OR,1.58[95%CI,1.07-2.33]至 OR,3.13[95%CI,2.16-4.52])和 ubrogepant(范围:OR,1.54[95%CI,1.00-2.37]至 OR,3.05[95%CI,2.02-4.60])。与拉米替坦相比,大多数曲坦类药物在 2 小时时疼痛缓解的 OR 更高(范围:OR,1.46[95%CI,1.09-1.96]至 OR,3.31[95%CI,2.41-4.55]),rimegepant(范围:OR,1.33[95%CI,1.01-1.76]至 OR,3.01[95%CI,2.33-3.88])和 ubrogepant(范围:OR,1.38[95%CI,1.02-1.88]至 OR,3.13[95%CI,2.35-4.15])。拉米替坦、rimegepant 和 ubrogepant 之间的比较在 2 小时时的疼痛缓解和疼痛缓解方面均无统计学意义。拉米替坦与任何不良事件的风险最高,某些曲坦类药物(利扎曲坦、舒马曲坦和佐米曲坦)与降钙素基因相关肽拮抗剂相比,也有更高的任何不良事件风险。

结论和相关性

对于剂量后 2 小时的疼痛缓解或疼痛缓解,拉米替坦、rimegepant 和 ubrogepant 与安慰剂相比,OR 更高,但与大多数曲坦类药物相比,OR 较低。然而,这些新的偏头痛特异性治疗类别的药物没有心血管风险,这可能为曲坦类药物提供了替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce5c/8506232/15abe685a18d/jamanetwopen-e2128544-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce5c/8506232/c3fbcfcd6f37/jamanetwopen-e2128544-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce5c/8506232/7df3a8a1f3b2/jamanetwopen-e2128544-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce5c/8506232/bc6a179cc117/jamanetwopen-e2128544-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce5c/8506232/3d533fc50e97/jamanetwopen-e2128544-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce5c/8506232/15abe685a18d/jamanetwopen-e2128544-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce5c/8506232/c3fbcfcd6f37/jamanetwopen-e2128544-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce5c/8506232/7df3a8a1f3b2/jamanetwopen-e2128544-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce5c/8506232/bc6a179cc117/jamanetwopen-e2128544-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce5c/8506232/3d533fc50e97/jamanetwopen-e2128544-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce5c/8506232/15abe685a18d/jamanetwopen-e2128544-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of New Pharmacologic Agents With Triptans for Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.新型药物与曲普坦类药物治疗偏头痛的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128544. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28544.
2
Relative efficacy of lasmiditan versus rimegepant and ubrogepant as acute treatments for migraine: network meta-analysis findings.利扎曲坦与rimegepant 和ubrogepant 作为偏头痛急性治疗药物的相对疗效:网络荟萃分析结果。
J Headache Pain. 2022 Jul 6;23(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01440-w.
3
Comparative effects of drug interventions for the acute management of migraine episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis.成人偏头痛发作急性期药物干预的比较效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2024 Sep 18;386:e080107. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080107.
4
Efficacy of lasmiditan, rimegepant and ubrogepant for acute treatment of migraine in triptan insufficient responders: systematic review and network meta-analysis.利扎曲坦、rimegepant 和ubrogepant 治疗曲坦类药物反应不足的偏头痛急性发作的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Headache Pain. 2024 Nov 8;25(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01904-1.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety of rimegepant, ubrogepant, and lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine: a network meta-analysis.利马曲班、乌布曲班和拉米替坦治疗偏头痛急性发作的疗效和安全性比较:网状荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Jan;22(1):155-166. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1945444. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
6
Drugs for the acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents.用于儿童和青少年偏头痛急性治疗的药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 19;4(4):CD005220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005220.pub2.
7
Triptans in the Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.曲坦类药物在偏头痛急性治疗中的应用:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Headache. 2015 Jul-Aug;55 Suppl 4:221-35. doi: 10.1111/head.12601. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
8
Comparison of effectiveness and safety of lasmiditan and CGRP-antagonists for the acute treatment of migraine in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.拉米地坦与降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)拮抗剂用于成人偏头痛急性治疗的有效性和安全性比较:随机试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Headache Pain. 2024 Feb 5;25(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01723-4.
9
Zolmitriptan for acute migraine attacks in adults.佐米曲普坦用于成人急性偏头痛发作
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 21;2014(5):CD008616. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008616.pub2.
10
Rimegepant, Ubrogepant, and Lasmiditan in the Acute Treatment of Migraine Examining the Benefit-Risk Profile Using Number Needed to Treat/Harm.利扎曲普坦、乌布曲普坦和拉米地坦在偏头痛急性治疗中的应用:用需要治疗人数/危害比评估获益风险比。
Clin J Pain. 2022 Nov 1;38(11):680-685. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001072.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the association between migraine treatments and tinnitus: Insights from the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system.评估偏头痛治疗与耳鸣之间的关联:来自美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的见解。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 20;20(8):e0330493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330493. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy and safety of remote electrical neuromodulation in migraine: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.远程电神经调节治疗偏头痛的疗效与安全性:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Neurol. 2025 Aug 9;25(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04291-5.
3
Gepants in Primary Care: A Targeted Approach to Acute and Preventive Treatment of Migraine.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive effects and acceptability of non-invasive brain stimulation on Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a component network meta-analysis.非侵入性脑刺激对阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍的认知影响和可接受性:一个成分网络荟萃分析。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;92(2):195-203. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323870. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
Pain Freedom at 2 to 8 Hours With Lasmiditan: A Comparison With Rimegepant and Ubrogepant.使用拉米地坦2至8小时实现疼痛缓解:与瑞美吉泮和ubrogepant的比较。
Headache. 2020 Sep;60(8):1793-1796. doi: 10.1111/head.13899. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
3
Short-term efficacy and safety of lasmiditan, a novel 5-HT receptor agonist, for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
基层医疗中的 gepants:偏头痛急性和预防性治疗的靶向方法。
Pain Ther. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00757-z.
4
Perceived fear and exercise difficulty in patients with migraine and their association with psychosocial factors: a cross-sectional study.偏头痛患者的感知恐惧与运动困难及其与社会心理因素的关联:一项横断面研究。
PeerJ. 2025 May 12;13:e19342. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19342. eCollection 2025.
5
Saudi clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prevention of migraine headache.沙特偏头痛治疗与预防临床实践指南。
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2025 Apr;30(2):77-91. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2025.2.20240097.
6
The Lung Microbiome Modulates Pain-Like Behavior Via the Lung-Brain Axis in a Nitroglycerin-Induced Chronic Migraine Mouse Model.在硝酸甘油诱导的慢性偏头痛小鼠模型中,肺微生物群通过肺-脑轴调节疼痛样行为。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Jun;12(23):e2416348. doi: 10.1002/advs.202416348. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
7
The efficacy and safety of zavegepant nasal inhalation versus oral calcitonin-gene related peptide receptor antagonists in the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the literature.在偏头痛急性治疗中,扎韦普坦鼻内吸入剂与口服降钙素基因相关肽受体拮抗剂的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价及文献网络荟萃分析
J Headache Pain. 2025 Mar 10;26(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s10194-025-01984-7.
8
Lasmiditan and Different Triptans in Menstrual Migraine: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.拉米地坦与不同曲坦类药物治疗月经性偏头痛的贝叶斯网络Meta分析。
Pain Ther. 2025 Apr;14(2):639-653. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00705-x. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
9
The impact of headache specialist density and the introduction of gepants and lasmitidan on prescriptions for acute migraine treatments: a regression and interrupted time series analysis.头痛专科医生密度以及 gepants 和 lasmitidan 的引入对急性偏头痛治疗处方的影响:一项回归分析和中断时间序列分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Feb 7;16:1530499. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1530499. eCollection 2025.
10
Nanoformulation innovations: Revolutionizing precision in migraine therapy.纳米制剂创新:变革偏头痛治疗的精准度
Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2025;28(1):16-30. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2024.79824.17290.
新型 5-HT 受体激动剂拉米替坦治疗偏头痛急性发作的短期疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Headache Pain. 2020 Jun 5;21(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01138-x.
4
Ubrogepant for the Treatment of Migraine.乌布罗苷肽治疗偏头痛。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 5;381(23):2230-2241. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813049.
5
Effect of Ubrogepant vs Placebo on Pain and the Most Bothersome Associated Symptom in the Acute Treatment of Migraine: The ACHIEVE II Randomized Clinical Trial.Ubrogepant 与安慰剂在偏头痛急性治疗中对疼痛及最困扰相关症状的影响:ACHIEVE II 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Nov 19;322(19):1887-1898. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.16711.
6
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
7
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet for the acute treatment of migraine: a randomised, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.利马曲班口腔崩解片治疗偏头痛急性发作的疗效、安全性和耐受性:一项随机、3 期、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2019 Aug 31;394(10200):737-745. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31606-X. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
8
Rimegepant, an Oral Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonist, for Migraine.利马前列素,一种口服降钙素基因相关肽受体拮抗剂,用于偏头痛。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 11;381(2):142-149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811090.
9
Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine.拉米地坦治疗偏头痛急性发作的 3 期随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究。
Brain. 2019 Jul 1;142(7):1894-1904. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz134.
10
Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of acute treatment of migraine attacks in adults: Fourth edition.国际头痛学会成人偏头痛急性发作治疗对照试验指南:第四版。
Cephalalgia. 2019 May;39(6):687-710. doi: 10.1177/0333102419828967. Epub 2019 Feb 26.