The MITRE Corporation, United States.
The MITRE Corporation, United States.
Waste Manag. 2024 Mar 15;176:149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.12.051. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
In this paper, we examine the primary impact of two categories of food recovery policies on food donation and the secondary impact on food safety, food waste, and food insecurity in U.S. states. As one method of food recovery, food donation can reduce food waste while mitigating food insecurity, and it can be promoted in U.S. states through strong liability protection policies that provide legal protection to food donors and through tax incentivization policies that financially reward food donors via deductions and/or credits. To provide an initial evaluation of the effects of these policies, we coded each state's food recovery policies in 2012 and 2018 and compared strong policies versus weak policies. Using data from multiple sources, we found that states with stronger liability protection policies had more food donations, and states that provide tax incentivization had more food waste. Although our analyses were correlational, rather than causal, and were reliant upon limited data, our results demonstrate that the current food recovery policy landscape in U.S. states does relate to important food waste outcomes. We discuss the implications of these findings for crafting more effective policies that encourage food recovery.
本文考察了两类食品回收政策对美国各州食品捐赠的主要影响,以及对食品安全、食品浪费和粮食不安全的次要影响。作为食品回收的一种方法,食品捐赠既可以减少食物浪费,又可以缓解粮食不安全问题,通过强有力的责任保护政策为食品捐赠者提供法律保护,以及通过税收激励政策为食品捐赠者提供税收减免和/或抵免,在美国各州可以促进食品捐赠。为了初步评估这些政策的效果,我们在 2012 年和 2018 年对每个州的食品回收政策进行了编码,并将强有力的政策与薄弱的政策进行了比较。利用来自多个来源的数据,我们发现具有更强责任保护政策的州有更多的食品捐赠,而提供税收激励的州则有更多的食品浪费。虽然我们的分析是相关的,而不是因果关系的,并且依赖于有限的数据,但我们的结果表明,美国各州目前的食品回收政策格局确实与重要的食品浪费结果有关。我们讨论了这些发现对制定更有效的鼓励食品回收政策的意义。