Soil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands; State Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, National Academy of Agriculture Green Development, National Observation and Research Station of Agriculture Green Development, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Soil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands; College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Northwest A&F University, 712100 Yangling, China.
Environ Int. 2024 Feb;184:108457. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108457. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
Rural residents are exposed to both particulate and gaseous pesticides in the indoor-outdoor nexus in their daily routine. However, previous personal exposure assessment mostly focuses on single aspects of the exposure, such as indoor or gaseous exposure, leading to severe cognition bias to evaluate the exposure risks. In this study, residential dust and silicone wristbands (including stationary and personal wearing ones) were used to screen pesticides in different phases and unfold the hidden characteristics of personal exposure via indoor-outdoor nexus in intensive agricultural area. Mento-Carlo Simulation was performed to assess the probabilistic exposure risk by transforming adsorbed pesticides from wristbands into air concentration, which explores a new approach to integrate particulate (dust) and gaseous (silicone wristbands) pesticide exposures in indoor and outdoor environment. The results showed that particulate pesticides were more concentrated in indoor, whereas significantly higher concentrations were detected in stationary outdoor wristbands (p < 0.05). Carbendazim and chlorpyrifos were the most frequently detected pesticides in dust and stationary wristbands. Higher pesticide concentration was found in personal wristbands worn by farmers, with the maximum value of 2048 ng g for difenoconazole. Based on the probabilistic risk assessment, around 7.1 % of farmers and 2.6 % of bystanders in local populations were potentially suffering from chronic health issues. One third of pesticide exposures originated mainly from occupational sources while the rest derived from remoting dissipation. Unexpectedly, 43 % of bystanders suffered the same levels of exposure as farmers under the co-existence of occupational and non-occupational exposures. Differed compositions of pesticides were found between environmental samples and personal pesticide exposure patterns, highlighting the need for holistic personal exposure measurements.
农村居民在日常生活中会在室内-室外接触点同时接触到颗粒状和气体农药。然而,之前的个人暴露评估主要集中在暴露的单一方面,如室内或气体暴露,导致严重的认知偏差,从而无法评估暴露风险。在这项研究中,使用住宅灰尘和硅树脂腕带(包括固定和个人佩戴的腕带)来筛选不同阶段的农药,并通过密集农业区的室内-室外接触点展开个人暴露的隐藏特征。通过将腕带吸附的农药转化为空气浓度,进行蒙托卡罗模拟来评估概率暴露风险,这探索了一种将室内和室外环境中的颗粒状(灰尘)和气体(硅树脂腕带)农药暴露相结合的新方法。结果表明,颗粒状农药在室内更为集中,而固定在室外的腕带中则检测到明显更高的浓度(p<0.05)。多菌灵和毒死蜱是灰尘和固定腕带中最常检测到的农药。农民佩戴的个人腕带中发现农药浓度更高,其中联苯菊酯的最高值为 2048ng g。基于概率风险评估,约 7.1%的农民和当地人群中的 2.6%的旁观者可能患有慢性健康问题。三分之一的农药暴露主要来源于职业来源,其余则来源于远程消散。出乎意料的是,在职业和非职业暴露共存的情况下,43%的旁观者的暴露水平与农民相同。在环境样本和个人农药暴露模式之间发现了不同的农药组成,这突出了需要进行整体的个人暴露测量。