British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada.
Interdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, 270-2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jan 29;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00933-y.
Against the backdrop of North America's overdose crisis, most overdose deaths are occurring in housing environments, largely due to individuals using drugs alone. Overdose deaths in cities remain concentrated in marginal housing environments (e.g., single-room occupancy housing, shelters), which are often the only forms of housing available to urban poor and drug-using communities. This commentary aims to highlight current housing-based overdose prevention interventions and to situate them within the broader environmental contexts of marginal housing. In doing so, we call attention to the need to better understand marginal housing as sites of overdose vulnerability and public health intervention to optimize responses to the overdose crisis.
In response to high overdose rates in marginal housing environments several interventions (e.g., housing-based supervised consumption rooms, peer-witnessed injection) have recently been implemented in select jurisdictions. However, even with the growing recognition of marginal housing as a key intervention site, housing-based interventions have yet to be scaled up in a meaningful way. Further, there have been persistent challenges to tailoring these approaches to address dynamics within housing environments. Thus, while it is critical to expand coverage of housing-based interventions across marginal housing environments, these interventions must also attend to the contextual drivers of risks in these settings to best foster enabling environments for harm reduction and maximize impacts.
Emerging housing-focused interventions are designed to address key drivers of overdose risk (e.g., using alone, toxic drug supply). Yet, broader contextual factors (e.g., drug criminalization, housing quality, gender) are equally critical factors that shape how structurally vulnerable people who use drugs navigate and engage with harm reduction interventions. A more comprehensive understanding of these contextual factors within housing environments is needed to inform policy and programmatic interventions that are responsive to the needs of people who use drugs in these settings.
在北美的阿片类药物过量危机背景下,大多数过量死亡都发生在住房环境中,主要是因为个人独自使用药物。城市中的过量死亡仍然集中在边缘住房环境(例如,单人间出租房、收容所),这些环境往往是城市贫困和吸毒社区唯一可获得的住房形式。本评论旨在强调当前基于住房的过量预防干预措施,并将其置于边缘住房的更广泛环境背景下。这样做,我们提请注意需要更好地理解边缘住房作为过量脆弱性和公共卫生干预的场所,以优化对过量危机的应对。
针对边缘住房环境中高过量率,最近在几个司法管辖区实施了一些干预措施(例如,基于住房的监督消费房,同伴见证注射)。然而,即使越来越认识到边缘住房是一个关键的干预场所,基于住房的干预措施尚未以有意义的方式扩大规模。此外,还存在持续的挑战,即调整这些方法以解决住房环境中的动态问题。因此,虽然扩大基于住房的干预措施在边缘住房环境中的覆盖面至关重要,但这些干预措施还必须关注这些环境中风险的背景驱动因素,以最好地促进减少伤害的有利环境,并最大限度地提高影响。
新兴的以住房为重点的干预措施旨在解决过量风险的关键驱动因素(例如,独自使用,有毒药物供应)。然而,更广泛的背景因素(例如,药物刑事定罪,住房质量,性别)同样是影响结构脆弱的吸毒者如何在这些环境中导航和参与减少伤害干预的关键因素。需要更全面地了解住房环境中的这些背景因素,以为这些环境中吸毒者的需求提供政策和方案干预。