Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Hum Genet. 2024 Feb;143(2):197-210. doi: 10.1007/s00439-023-02631-4. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
The purpose of this study was to screen Copy Number Variations (CNVs) in 35 unsolved Inherited Retinal Dystrophy (IRD) families. Initially, next generation sequencing, including a specific Hereditary Eye Disease Enrichment Panel or Whole exome sequencing, was employed to screen (likely) pathogenic Single-nucleotide Variants (SNVs) and small Insertions and Deletions (indels) for these cases. All available SNVs and indels were further validated and co-segregation analyses were performed in available family members by Sanger sequencing. If not, after excluding deep intronic variants, Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR) and Sanger sequencing were employed to screen CNVs. We determined that 18 probands who had heterozygous SNVs/indels or whose parents were not consanguineous but had homozygous SNVs/indels in autosomal recessive IRDs genes had CNVs in another allele of these genes, 11 families had disease-causing hemizygous CNVs in X-linked IRD genes, 6 families had (likely) pathogenic heterozygous CNVs in PRPF31 gene. Of 35 families, 33 different CNVs in 16 IRD-associated genes were detected, with PRPF31, EYS and USH2A the most common disease-causing gene in CNVs. Twenty-six and 7 of them were deletion and duplication CNVs, respectively. Among them, 14 CNVs were first reported in this study. Our research indicates that CNVs contribute a lot to IRDs, and screening of CNVs substantially increases the diagnostic rate of IRD. Our results emphasize that MLPA and QF-PCR are ideal methods to validate CNVs, and the novel CNVs reported herein expand the mutational spectrums of IRDs.
本研究旨在对 35 个未解决的遗传性视网膜疾病(IRD)家系进行拷贝数变异(CNVs)筛查。最初,采用下一代测序,包括特定的遗传性眼病富集panel 或全外显子测序,对这些病例进行可能的致病性单核苷酸变异(SNVs)和小插入/缺失(indels)的筛查。对所有可用的 SNVs 和 indels 进行进一步验证,并通过 Sanger 测序在可用的家系成员中进行共分离分析。如果没有,则在排除深内含子变异后,采用多重连接依赖性探针扩增(MLPA)、定量荧光 PCR(QF-PCR)和 Sanger 测序对 CNVs 进行筛查。我们确定,18 名先证者存在杂合性 SNVs/indels,或其父母非近亲婚配但存在常染色体隐性 IRD 基因的纯合性 SNVs/indels,这些基因的另一个等位基因存在 CNVs,11 个家系的 X 连锁 IRD 基因存在致病性半合性 CNVs,6 个家系的 PRPF31 基因存在(可能)致病性杂合性 CNVs。在 35 个家系中,共检测到 16 个 IRD 相关基因中的 33 种不同的 CNVs,其中 PRPF31、EYS 和 USH2A 是 CNVs 中最常见的致病基因。其中 26 种和 7 种分别为缺失和重复 CNVs。其中,有 14 种 CNVs 为本研究首次报道。我们的研究表明,CNVs 对 IRD 有很大的贡献,对 CNVs 的筛查大大提高了 IRD 的诊断率。我们的结果强调,MLPA 和 QF-PCR 是验证 CNVs 的理想方法,本研究报道的新 CNVs 扩展了 IRD 的突变谱。