Suppr超能文献

筛查 35 个未解决遗传性视网膜疾病家系中的拷贝数变异。

Screening copy number variations in 35 unsolved inherited retinal disease families.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.

Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.

出版信息

Hum Genet. 2024 Feb;143(2):197-210. doi: 10.1007/s00439-023-02631-4. Epub 2024 Jan 29.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to screen Copy Number Variations (CNVs) in 35 unsolved Inherited Retinal Dystrophy (IRD) families. Initially, next generation sequencing, including a specific Hereditary Eye Disease Enrichment Panel or Whole exome sequencing, was employed to screen (likely) pathogenic Single-nucleotide Variants (SNVs) and small Insertions and Deletions (indels) for these cases. All available SNVs and indels were further validated and co-segregation analyses were performed in available family members by Sanger sequencing. If not, after excluding deep intronic variants, Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR) and Sanger sequencing were employed to screen CNVs. We determined that 18 probands who had heterozygous SNVs/indels or whose parents were not consanguineous but had homozygous SNVs/indels in autosomal recessive IRDs genes had CNVs in another allele of these genes, 11 families had disease-causing hemizygous CNVs in X-linked IRD genes, 6 families had (likely) pathogenic heterozygous CNVs in PRPF31 gene. Of 35 families, 33 different CNVs in 16 IRD-associated genes were detected, with PRPF31, EYS and USH2A the most common disease-causing gene in CNVs. Twenty-six and 7 of them were deletion and duplication CNVs, respectively. Among them, 14 CNVs were first reported in this study. Our research indicates that CNVs contribute a lot to IRDs, and screening of CNVs substantially increases the diagnostic rate of IRD. Our results emphasize that MLPA and QF-PCR are ideal methods to validate CNVs, and the novel CNVs reported herein expand the mutational spectrums of IRDs.

摘要

本研究旨在对 35 个未解决的遗传性视网膜疾病(IRD)家系进行拷贝数变异(CNVs)筛查。最初,采用下一代测序,包括特定的遗传性眼病富集panel 或全外显子测序,对这些病例进行可能的致病性单核苷酸变异(SNVs)和小插入/缺失(indels)的筛查。对所有可用的 SNVs 和 indels 进行进一步验证,并通过 Sanger 测序在可用的家系成员中进行共分离分析。如果没有,则在排除深内含子变异后,采用多重连接依赖性探针扩增(MLPA)、定量荧光 PCR(QF-PCR)和 Sanger 测序对 CNVs 进行筛查。我们确定,18 名先证者存在杂合性 SNVs/indels,或其父母非近亲婚配但存在常染色体隐性 IRD 基因的纯合性 SNVs/indels,这些基因的另一个等位基因存在 CNVs,11 个家系的 X 连锁 IRD 基因存在致病性半合性 CNVs,6 个家系的 PRPF31 基因存在(可能)致病性杂合性 CNVs。在 35 个家系中,共检测到 16 个 IRD 相关基因中的 33 种不同的 CNVs,其中 PRPF31、EYS 和 USH2A 是 CNVs 中最常见的致病基因。其中 26 种和 7 种分别为缺失和重复 CNVs。其中,有 14 种 CNVs 为本研究首次报道。我们的研究表明,CNVs 对 IRD 有很大的贡献,对 CNVs 的筛查大大提高了 IRD 的诊断率。我们的结果强调,MLPA 和 QF-PCR 是验证 CNVs 的理想方法,本研究报道的新 CNVs 扩展了 IRD 的突变谱。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25f9/10881639/030152a2dc28/439_2023_2631_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验