• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

照顾慢性患者药物依从性的紧张局势:塞浦路斯的一项定性研究。

Tensions in caring for chronic patients' medication adherence: A qualitative study in Cyprus.

机构信息

University of Cyprus, Cyprus.

University of Nicosia, Cyprus.

出版信息

J Health Psychol. 2024 Sep;29(10):1088-1100. doi: 10.1177/13591053241227003. Epub 2024 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1177/13591053241227003
PMID:38282383
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11344954/
Abstract

Medication adherence (MA) to recommended treatment is a multi-faceted problem and an ongoing challenge for healthcare providers (HCPs) to monitor. This qualitative study with 10 HCPs in Cyprus aims to explore HCPs' perceptions and strategies used on addressing medication non-adherence (MNA) in patients with chronic conditions. Two main themes emerged from the analysis reflecting the ways that HCPs described their reactions to MNA of their patients: (1) "Relying on information provision to improve MA" and (2) "Trying to understand patients' perspective." HCPs reported empathizing with patients and engaging in discussions to understand patients' perspective and reasons for MNA, so as to explore alternative solutions. Simultaneously, some HCPs reflected that the techniques used to improve MA are solely centered around information on medication and side-effects. HCPs experienced an internal conflict between providing patient-centered care versus using directive approaches to improve MA. Findings suggest how HCPs could thoroughly address patients' individual barriers.

摘要

药物依从性(MA)对推荐的治疗方案的坚持是医疗保健提供者(HCPs)需要持续监测的一个多方面问题。这项在塞浦路斯进行的针对 10 名 HCPs 的定性研究旨在探讨 HCPs 在处理慢性病患者药物不依从(MNA)方面的看法和使用的策略。分析中出现了两个主要主题,反映了 HCPs 描述他们对患者 MNA 的反应的方式:(1)“依靠信息提供来改善 MA”和(2)“试图理解患者的观点”。HCPs 报告说他们对患者表示同情,并进行讨论以了解患者的观点和 MNA 的原因,从而探索替代解决方案。同时,一些 HCPs 反映说,用于改善 MA 的技术仅集中在药物和副作用的信息上。HCPs 在提供以患者为中心的护理与使用指导方法来改善 MA 之间存在内在冲突。研究结果表明 HCPs 如何彻底解决患者的个体障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad3/11344954/a784c8df1503/10.1177_13591053241227003-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad3/11344954/a784c8df1503/10.1177_13591053241227003-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad3/11344954/a784c8df1503/10.1177_13591053241227003-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Tensions in caring for chronic patients' medication adherence: A qualitative study in Cyprus.照顾慢性患者药物依从性的紧张局势:塞浦路斯的一项定性研究。
J Health Psychol. 2024 Sep;29(10):1088-1100. doi: 10.1177/13591053241227003. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
2
Healthcare professionals' perceptions on barriers and facilitators to DMARD use in rheumatoid arthritis.医疗保健专业人员对类风湿关节炎中 DMARD 使用的障碍和促进因素的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 13;22(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07459-0.
3
Explaining Differences in the Acceptability of 99DOTS, a Cell Phone-Based Strategy for Monitoring Adherence to Tuberculosis Medications: Qualitative Study of Patients and Health Care Providers.解释基于手机的 99DOTS 策略监测结核病药物依从性的可接受性差异:患者和卫生保健提供者的定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 31;8(7):e16634. doi: 10.2196/16634.
4
Patients' Perspective of Medication Adherence in Chronic Conditions: A Qualitative Study.慢性病患者对药物依从性的看法:一项定性研究。
Adv Ther. 2016 Oct;33(10):1740-1754. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0394-6. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
5
Medication decision-making for patients with renal insufficiency in inpatient and outpatient care at a US Veterans Affairs Medical Centre: a qualitative, cognitive task analysis.美国退伍军人事务医疗中心住院和门诊患者肾功能不全的药物决策:一项定性、认知任务分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e027439. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027439.
6
eHealth, Participatory Medicine, and Ethical Care: A Focus Group Study of Patients' and Health Care Providers' Use of Health-Related Internet Information.电子健康、参与式医疗与伦理关怀:一项关于患者及医疗服务提供者对健康相关互联网信息使用情况的焦点小组研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 22;17(6):e155. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3792.
7
Improving outcomes for multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis in the Peruvian Amazon - a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals.提高秘鲁亚马逊地区耐多药结核病的治疗效果 - 一项定性研究,探讨了患者和医疗保健专业人员的经验和看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4429-y.
8
Working with patients suffering from chronic diseases can be a balancing act for health care professionals - a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.与患有慢性病的患者合作对于医疗保健专业人员来说可能是一种平衡行为 - 定性研究的综合分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4826-2.
9
"Take the tablet or don't take the tablet?"-A qualitative study of patients' experiences of self-administering anti-cancer medications related to adherence and managing side effects.“服药还是不服药?”-一项关于患者自我管理与药物依从性和副作用管理相关的抗癌药物治疗体验的定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Nov 7;31(12):680. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08122-6.
10
Type 2 diabetes patients' and providers' differing perspectives on medication nonadherence: a qualitative meta-synthesis.2型糖尿病患者与医疗服务提供者对药物治疗不依从的不同观点:一项定性元分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 23;15:516. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1174-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient and provider's perspective on barriers and facilitators for medication adherence among adult patients with cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus in India: a qualitative evidence synthesis.印度成年心血管疾病和糖尿病患者药物依从性障碍及促进因素:患者和提供者视角的定性证据综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 24;12(3):e055226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055226.
2
Patient and healthcare provider perspectives on adherence with antihypertensive medications: an exploratory qualitative study in Tanzania.患者和医疗保健提供者对抗高血压药物治疗依从性的观点:坦桑尼亚的一项探索性定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 18;21(1):834. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06858-7.
3
Factors Contributing to Medication Adherence in Patients with a Chronic Condition: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Research.
慢性病患者药物依从性的影响因素:定性研究的范围综述
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Jul 20;13(7):1100. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13071100.
4
Improving adherence in chronic airways disease: are we doing it wrongly?改善慢性气道疾病的依从性:我们做得不对吗?
Breathe (Sheff). 2021 Jun;17(2):210022. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0022-2021.
5
Fear appeals to promote better health behaviors: an investigation of potential mediators.恐惧诉求对促进更健康行为的影响:潜在中介因素的调查
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2021 Jul 6;9(1):600-618. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2021.1947290. eCollection 2021.
6
Motivational Interviewing: An Evidence-Based Approach for Use in Medical Practice.动机性访谈:一种在医学实践中应用的循证方法。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Feb 19;118(7):109-115. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0014.
7
Barriers, facilitators, and interventions for medication adherence across chronic conditions with the highest non-adherence rates: a scoping review with recommendations for intervention development.具有最高不依从率的慢性疾病中药物依从性的障碍、促进因素和干预措施:一项范围综述,为干预措施的制定提供了建议。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Dec 31;10(6):1390-1398. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa118.
8
Prevalence of multimorbidity in the Cypriot population; A cross-sectional study (2018-2019).塞浦路斯人群中多种疾病共存的流行情况;一项横断面研究(2018-2019 年)。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 26;15(10):e0239835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239835. eCollection 2020.
9
Behaviour change techniques associated with smoking cessation in intervention and comparator groups of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-regression.与干预组和对照组随机对照试验中戒烟相关的行为改变技术:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Addiction. 2020 Nov;115(11):2008-2020. doi: 10.1111/add.15056. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
10
Who decides? Shared decision-making among colorectal cancer surgery patients in China.谁来决定?中国结直肠癌手术患者的共同决策。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Nov;28(11):5353-5361. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05391-3. Epub 2020 Mar 5.