• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁来决定?中国结直肠癌手术患者的共同决策。

Who decides? Shared decision-making among colorectal cancer surgery patients in China.

机构信息

Office of Research Management and Education Administration, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China.

School of Sociology and Anthropology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2020 Nov;28(11):5353-5361. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05391-3. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-020-05391-3
PMID:32133543
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patient-centered care (PCC) and shared decision-making (SDM) is advised within the English medical literature for its positive impact. The benefits of such approaches are said to foster increased trust, patient decision satisfaction, and even better outcomes. Looking at a Chinese cancer hospital, this research sought to understand how surgical decision-making was made among colorectal cancer patients.

METHODS

Observations (n = 36) and semi-structured interviews (n = 24) were conducted with patients and family members.

RESULTS

In the observations, 69.4% of the participating families made the decision to undergo surgery at the end of the consultation. In the interviews, three main themes emerged in regard to the characteristics in the family decision-making model, and they included three structural elements: the patient's sick role, family functional structure, and control of information.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the Chinese decision-making model is different from the western SDM model. In the Chinese context, family members dominated the decision-making process which raised concerns around informed consent. This may benefit patients insofar as receiving timely treatment in the short term but at the same time may be at the expense of limiting patient's autonomy. The promotion of a new model or a model encompassing family-centered care values may be more appropriate in clinical practice in China that can address the issues around informed consent.

摘要

目的

在英文医学文献中,建议采用以患者为中心的护理(PCC)和共同决策(SDM),因为它们具有积极影响。据称,这些方法的好处可以促进增加信任、患者决策满意度,甚至更好的结果。本研究以一家中国癌症医院为研究对象,旨在了解结直肠癌患者的手术决策是如何做出的。

方法

对患者及其家属进行了观察(n=36)和半结构化访谈(n=24)。

结果

在观察中,69.4%的参与家庭在咨询结束时决定接受手术。在访谈中,家庭决策模式的特征出现了三个主要主题,它们包括三个结构要素:患者的病患角色、家庭功能结构和信息控制。

结论

本研究表明,中国的决策模式与西方的 SDM 模式不同。在中国语境下,家庭成员主导决策过程,这引发了知情同意方面的问题。从短期来看,这可能使患者受益,因为他们可以及时得到治疗,但同时也可能以限制患者自主权为代价。在中国的临床实践中,推广一种新的模式或一种包含以家庭为中心的护理价值观的模式可能更合适,可以解决知情同意方面的问题。

相似文献

1
Who decides? Shared decision-making among colorectal cancer surgery patients in China.谁来决定?中国结直肠癌手术患者的共同决策。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Nov;28(11):5353-5361. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05391-3. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
2
Surgical Consultation as Social Process: Implications for Shared Decision Making.外科会诊的社会过程:对共同决策的影响。
Ann Surg. 2019 Mar;269(3):446-452. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002610.
3
Does the use of shared decision-making consultation behaviors increase treatment decision-making satisfaction among Chinese women facing decision for breast cancer surgery?使用共同决策咨询行为是否会提高面临乳腺癌手术决策的中国女性对治疗决策的满意度?
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
4
Ethical decision making and patient autonomy: a comparison of physicians and patients in Japan and the United States.伦理决策与患者自主权:日本和美国医生与患者的比较
Chest. 2000 Oct;118(4):1172-82. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.4.1172.
5
What makes difficult decisions so difficult?: An activity theory analysis of decision making for physicians treating children with medical complexity.是什么让艰难决策变得如此困难?:对治疗患有复杂疾病的儿童的医生进行决策的活动理论分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Nov;103(11):2260-2268. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.027. Epub 2020 May 5.
6
What are the ingredients for a successful evidence-based patient choice consultation?: A qualitative study.成功的循证患者选择咨询的要素有哪些?一项定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Feb;56(3):589-602. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00056-4.
7
"I need to know what makes somebody tick …": Challenges and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Individualized Oncology.“我需要知道是什么在驱动着……”:个体化肿瘤学中实施共享决策的挑战与策略。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):555-562. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0615. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
8
Family members' perceptions of inpatient palliative care consult services: a qualitative study.家庭成员对住院姑息治疗咨询服务的看法:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;28(1):42-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216313491620. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
9
Shared decision making and decision aids - a literature review.共同决策与决策辅助工具——文献综述
Aust Fam Physician. 2006 Jul;35(7):537-40.
10
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.乳腺 X 线摄影共享决策的关键要素:文献的范围综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultural and ethical barriers to implementing end-of-life advance care planning among oncology nursing professionals: a content analysis of open-ended questions.肿瘤护理专业人员实施临终预立医疗照护计划的文化和伦理障碍:对开放式问题的内容分析
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 11;26(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01261-x.
2
Congruence of cancer patients' desired and achieved decision-making roles between self, doctor and family: a cross-sectional multi-site survey.癌症患者期望的与实际达成的自我、医生及家庭之间决策角色的一致性:一项多中心横断面调查
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1120. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14510-4.
3
Analysis of Influencing Factors and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making Among Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Qualitative Studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Lost in 'Culturation': medical informed consent in China (from a Western perspective).迷失在“文化适应”中:中国的医疗知情同意(从西方视角看)
Med Health Care Philos. 2019 Mar;22(1):17-30. doi: 10.1007/s11019-018-9835-0.
2
Patient-physician mistrust and violence against physicians in Guangdong Province, China: a qualitative study.中国广东省患者与医生之间的不信任及针对医生的暴力行为:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 6;5(10):e008221. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008221.
3
Informed consent procedures with cognitively impaired patients: A review of ethics and best practices.
胃肠癌患者实施共同决策的影响因素及策略分析:定性研究的系统评价与Meta分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17317-6.
4
Understanding social integration and health outcomes among China's internal migrants: a systematic review.了解中国国内流动人口的社会融合与健康状况:一项系统综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;13:1536526. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1536526. eCollection 2025.
5
Cognitive Authority Theory: Reframing health inequity, disadvantage and privilege in palliative and end-of-life care.认知权威理论:重新构建姑息治疗和临终关怀中的健康不平等、劣势与特权问题。
Palliat Med. 2025 Apr;39(4):448-459. doi: 10.1177/02692163251321713. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
6
Examining cancer patient preferences during three stages of decision making and family involvement: a multicenter survey study in China.在中国进行的一项多中心调查研究:考察癌症患者在三个决策阶段的偏好及家庭参与情况。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02846-z.
7
Applying Neural Networks to Analyse Inflammatory, Sociodemographic, and Psychological Factors in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer and Colon Cancer: A Statistical and Artificial Intelligence Approach.应用神经网络分析非黑色素瘤皮肤癌和结肠癌中的炎症、社会人口统计学及心理因素:一种统计与人工智能方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 7;14(23):2759. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232759.
8
Tensions in caring for chronic patients' medication adherence: A qualitative study in Cyprus.照顾慢性患者药物依从性的紧张局势:塞浦路斯的一项定性研究。
J Health Psychol. 2024 Sep;29(10):1088-1100. doi: 10.1177/13591053241227003. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
9
Family roles in informed consent from the perspective of young Chinese doctors: a questionnaire study.从中国年轻医生的角度看知情同意中的家庭角色:问卷调查研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jan 3;25(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00999-6.
10
Shared decision-making in healthcare in mainland China: a scoping review.中国大陆医疗卫生中的共享决策:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 7;11:1162993. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1162993. eCollection 2023.
知情同意程序与认知障碍患者:伦理与最佳实践的回顾。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2015 Aug;69(8):462-71. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12289. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
4
Implementing and evaluating shared decision making in oncology practice.在肿瘤学实践中实施和评估共享决策。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Nov-Dec;64(6):377-88. doi: 10.3322/caac.21245. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
5
Breaking bad news in China--the dilemma of patients' autonomy and traditional norms. A first communication skills training for Chinese oncologists and caretakers.在中国传达坏消息——患者自主权与传统规范的困境。为中国肿瘤学家和护理人员开展的首次沟通技巧培训。
Psychooncology. 2013 May;22(5):1192-5. doi: 10.1002/pon.3112. Epub 2012 May 27.
6
The values and value of patient-centered care.以患者为中心的护理的价值观与价值
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):100-3. doi: 10.1370/afm.1239.
7
The family and harmonious medical decision making: cherishing an appropriate Confucian moral balance.家庭与和谐的医疗决策:珍视恰当的儒家道德平衡。
J Med Philos. 2010 Oct;35(5):573-86. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq046. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
8
Hidden in plain sight: medical visit companions as a resource for vulnerable older adults.显而易见却易被忽视:医疗探访陪伴者作为弱势老年人的一种资源
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jul 14;168(13):1409-15. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1409.
9
Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family's role in medical decision-making.关系自主性还是不当压力?家庭在医疗决策中的作用。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Mar;22(1):128-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00561.x.
10
The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship.医患关系的演变
Int J Surg. 2007 Feb;5(1):57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.01.005. Epub 2006 Mar 3.