Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting, Covington, Kentucky, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Mar;35(3):440-450. doi: 10.1111/jce.16190. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
During atrial fibrillation ablation (AFA), achievement of first pass isolation (FPI) reflects effective lesion formation and predicts long-term freedom from arrhythmia recurrence. We aim to determine the clinical and procedural predictors of pulmonary vein FPI.
We reviewed AFA procedures in a multicenter prospective registry of AFA (REAL-AF). A multivariate ordinal logistic regression, weighted by inverse proceduralist volume, was used to determine predictors of FPI.
A total of 2671 patients were included with 1806 achieving FPI in both vein sides, 702 achieving FPI in one, and 163 having no FPI. Individually, age, left atrial (LA) scar, higher power usage (50 W), greater posterior contact force, ablation index >350 posteriorly, Vizigo™ sheath utilization, nonstandard ventilation, and high operator volume (>6 monthly cases) were all related to improved odds of FPI. Conversely sleep apnea, elevated body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, LA enlargement, antiarrhythmic drug use, and center's higher fluoroscopy use were related to reduced odds of FPI. Multivariate analysis showed that BMI > 30 (OR 0.78 [0.64-0.96]) and LA volume (OR per mL increase = 1.00 [0.99-1.00]) predicted lower odds of achieving FPI, whereas significant left atrial scarring (>20%) was related to higher rates of FPI. Procedurally, the use of high power (50 W) (OR 1.32 [1.05-1.65]), increasing force posteriorly (OR 2.03 [1.19-3.46]), and nonstandard ventilation (OR 1.26 [1.00-1.59]) predicted higher FPI rates. At a site level, high procedural volume (OR 1.89 [1.48-2.41]) and low fluoroscopy centers (OR 0.72 [0.61-0.84]) had higher rates of FPI.
FPI rates are affected by operator experience, patient comorbidities, and procedural strategies. These factors may be postulated to impact acute lesion formation.
在心房颤动消融(AFA)期间,首次通过隔离(FPI)的实现反映了有效的病变形成,并预测了心律失常复发的长期无复发。我们旨在确定肺静脉 FPI 的临床和程序预测因素。
我们在多中心前瞻性 AFA 注册研究(REAL-AF)中回顾了 AFA 程序。使用逆程序师体积加权的多元有序逻辑回归来确定 FPI 的预测因素。
共纳入 2671 例患者,其中 1806 例双侧静脉均实现 FPI,702 例单侧实现 FPI,163 例无 FPI。单独来看,年龄、左心房(LA)瘢痕、更高的功率使用(50W)、更大的后接触力、消融指数>350 后、Vizigo™鞘利用、非标准通气和高操作者体积(>6 例/月)均与 FPI 概率增加相关。相反,睡眠呼吸暂停、BMI 升高(BMI)、糖尿病、LA 扩大、抗心律失常药物使用和中心更高的透视使用与 FPI 概率降低相关。多变量分析表明,BMI>30(OR 0.78[0.64-0.96])和 LA 体积(OR 每增加 1mL=1.00[0.99-1.00])预测 FPI 概率较低,而明显的左心房瘢痕(>20%)与较高的 FPI 率相关。在程序上,使用高功率(50W)(OR 1.32[1.05-1.65])、增加后部力(OR 2.03[1.19-3.46])和非标准通气(OR 1.26[1.00-1.59])预测 FPI 率较高。在站点级别,高程序体积(OR 1.89[1.48-2.41])和低透视中心(OR 0.72[0.61-0.84])具有更高的 FPI 率。
FPI 率受操作者经验、患者合并症和程序策略的影响。这些因素可能被假定为影响急性病变形成。