• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Motivation to lead in Japan: validation of a Japanese version of the motivation to lead scale.日本的领导动机:领导动机量表日文版的验证
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 12;14:1328593. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1328593. eCollection 2023.
2
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].[10 项大五人格量表法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
3
Motivation to lead: A meta-analysis and distal-proximal model of motivation and leadership.领导动机:动机和领导的元分析与远近模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Apr;105(4):331-354. doi: 10.1037/apl0000439. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
4
Validation of the Japanese version of the revised version of the compound psychological capital scale (CPC-12R).中文版复合心理资本量表修订版(CPC-12R)的日本版验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;13:1053601. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1053601. eCollection 2022.
5
Motivation to Lead as Mediator of Relations Between the Dark Triad, Big Five, and Leadership Intention.作为黑暗人格三合一、大五人格与领导意图之间关系调解因素的领导动机。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 20;12:675347. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675347. eCollection 2021.
6
Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: understanding the motivation to lead.迈向个体差异与领导力理论:理解领导动机。
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):481-98. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.481.
7
Reliability and validity of a self-report emotional expressivity measure: The Japanese version of the Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire.一份自我报告情绪表达性测量工具的信效度:伯克利表达性问卷日文版
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2016 Jan;13(1):196-201. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12094. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
8
Development of the Japanese version of the three-item loneliness scale.三项目孤独量表的日语版的编制。
BMC Psychol. 2019 Apr 5;7(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40359-019-0285-0.
9
Validation of the Japanese Big Five Scale Short Form in a University Student Sample.日本大五人格量表简版在大学生样本中的效度验证。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 23;13:862646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862646. eCollection 2022.
10
A validation of the Japanese adaptation of the Big Five Inventory-2.《大五人格量表-2》日本版的效度验证。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 14;13:924351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924351. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital natives of the labor market: Generation Z as future leaders and their perspectives on leadership.劳动力市场的数字原生代:Z 世代作为未来领导者及其对领导力的看法。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 31;15:1378982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378982. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Motivation to Lead as Mediator of Relations Between the Dark Triad, Big Five, and Leadership Intention.作为黑暗人格三合一、大五人格与领导意图之间关系调解因素的领导动机。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 20;12:675347. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675347. eCollection 2021.
2
How Ethical Leadership Shapes Employees' Readiness to Change: The Mediating Role of an Organizational Culture of Effectiveness.道德领导力如何塑造员工的变革意愿:有效组织文化的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 14;10:2493. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02493. eCollection 2019.
3
Motivation to lead: A meta-analysis and distal-proximal model of motivation and leadership.领导动机:动机和领导的元分析与远近模型。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Apr;105(4):331-354. doi: 10.1037/apl0000439. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
4
An exploratory study of gender and motivation to lead in millennials.千禧一代中性别与领导动机的探索性研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(2):138-152. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1570902.
5
Motivation related to work: A century of progress.工作动机:一个世纪的进步。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Mar;102(3):338-355. doi: 10.1037/apl0000133. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
6
Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.测量不变性的惯例与报告:心理学研究的现状与未来方向
Dev Rev. 2016 Sep;41:71-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
7
The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.下一个大五人格量表(BFI-2):开发和评估一个具有 15 个方面的层次模型,以提高带宽、保真度和预测能力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):117-143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000096. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
8
Why Japanese workers show low work engagement: An item response theory analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement scale.为什么日本工人的工作投入度较低:乌得勒支工作投入量表的项目反应理论分析。
Biopsychosoc Med. 2010 Nov 5;4:17. doi: 10.1186/1751-0759-4-17.
9
Leadership: Why gender and culture matter.领导力:为何性别和文化至关重要。
Am Psychol. 2010 Apr;65(3):157-70. doi: 10.1037/a0018806.
10
Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: understanding the motivation to lead.迈向个体差异与领导力理论:理解领导动机。
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):481-98. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.481.

日本的领导动机:领导动机量表日文版的验证

Motivation to lead in Japan: validation of a Japanese version of the motivation to lead scale.

作者信息

Tanaka Satoshi, Hatano Kai, Ikeda Megumi, Nakahara Jun

机构信息

College of Business, Rikkyo University, Tokyo, Japan.

Graduate School of Sustainable System Science, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 12;14:1328593. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1328593. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1328593
PMID:38282840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10820990/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the motivation to lead (MTL) scale consisting of three factors-affective-identity MTL, non-calculative MTL, and social-normative MTL-and examine its construct validity and reliability.

METHODS

The participants comprised 500 university students and 500 employees aged 20-29 years registered with a Japanese research company.

RESULTS

Based on a confirmatory factor analysis, the three-factor model was found to be appropriate for the Japanese context. The measurement invariance analyses indicated scalar invariance between students and employees and between men and women. Finally, the correlation analysis with the Big Five personality traits conducted to examine construct validity indicated that affective-identity MTL and social-normative MTL had significant relationships with all five traits (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, open-mindedness, and negative emotionality). Although non-calculative MTL was not significantly correlated, it can be interpreted in the Japanese context.

DISCUSSION

The results indicate the adequate construct validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the MTL scale. These findings hold significant implications for leadership development and selection in Japan, highlighting the motivational factors that drive effective leadership.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在开发一个日语版的领导动机(MTL)量表,该量表由三个因素组成——情感认同型MTL、非功利型MTL和社会规范型MTL——并检验其结构效度和信度。

方法

参与者包括500名大学生和500名年龄在20至29岁之间、在一家日本研究公司登记在册的员工。

结果

基于验证性因素分析,发现三因素模型适用于日本背景。测量不变性分析表明,学生与员工之间以及男性与女性之间存在标量不变性。最后,为检验结构效度而进行的与大五人格特质的相关分析表明,情感认同型MTL和社会规范型MTL与所有五个特质(外向性、宜人性、尽责性、开放性和负性情绪)均存在显著关系。虽然非功利型MTL没有显著相关性,但在日本背景下可以对其进行解释。

讨论

结果表明日语版MTL量表具有足够的结构效度和信度。这些发现对日本的领导力发展和选拔具有重要意义,突出了驱动有效领导的动机因素。