Vyas Kapil, Maheshwari Kriti, Reddy Praveen K Shanmugam, Verma Rajesh, Hasan Iffat, Mittal Asit
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2023 Dec 1;15(1):33-38. doi: 10.4103/idoj.idoj_500_22. eCollection 2024 Jan-Feb.
Chronic pruritus poses a significant challenge to treating physicians due to multitude of underlying causes and varying treatment strategies. Several topical, systemic, and physical modalities have been tried with variable success. Prescription practices in chronic pruritus are influenced by differential knowledge and experience of physicians, patient-related factors, and resource availability.
The purpose of this survey was to observe the current pattern of practice in Indian dermatologists in the management of chronic pruritus and to identify practice gaps particularly regarding the use of various systemic agents as antipruritics.
A previously validated questionnaire was sent to consultant dermatologists across India between January 2020 and July 2020. The questionnaire was comprised of six questions (multiple-choice questions as well as open-ended questions) regarding the use of antidepressants, cyclic gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogues, opioid antagonists, antihistamines, and alternate therapies in the management of chronic pruritus.
A total of 700 dermatologists completed the questionnaire (response rate 70%). Overall, antihistamines were the most common drug prescribed in chronic pruritus (more than 95% respondents). Other systemic agents such as opioid antagonists, gabapentinoids, and antidepressants were prescribed by 22.42%, 71.85%, and 75.29% respondents, respectively, in chronic pruritus as either monotherapy or in combination with antihistamines in specific types of itches. Among antidepressants, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) (69.29%) were prescribed most often, followed by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (32.29%) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (9.14%). Other treatment options such as omalizumab, thalidomide, ondansetron, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), and rifampicin were used by 10% respondents to alleviate pruritus in special situations.
This survey revealed the redundant practice of prescribing antihistamines in chronic pruritus irrespective of etiology among Indian dermatologists. It also revealed a differential approach regarding use of systemic agents such as gabapentinoids, opioid antagonists, and antidepressants, in academic and non-academic institutions. The survey emphasized a barrier in writing prescription of systemic agents such as opioid antagonist and SNRIs due to lack of knowledge and experience, fear of side effects, and inadequate available evidence.
慢性瘙痒因潜在病因众多且治疗策略各异,给治疗医生带来了重大挑战。已经尝试了多种局部、全身和物理治疗方法,但效果不一。慢性瘙痒的处方实践受到医生的知识差异和经验、患者相关因素以及资源可用性的影响。
本次调查的目的是观察印度皮肤科医生在慢性瘙痒管理方面的当前实践模式,并确定实践差距,特别是在使用各种全身性药物作为止痒药方面。
2020年1月至2020年7月期间,向印度各地的皮肤科顾问医生发送了一份先前经过验证的问卷。该问卷由六个问题(多项选择题和开放式问题)组成,涉及在慢性瘙痒管理中使用抗抑郁药、环状γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)类似物、阿片类拮抗剂、抗组胺药和替代疗法。
共有700名皮肤科医生完成了问卷(回复率70%)。总体而言,抗组胺药是慢性瘙痒中最常用的药物(超过95%的受访者)。其他全身性药物,如阿片类拮抗剂、加巴喷丁类药物和抗抑郁药,分别有22.42%、71.85%和75.29%的受访者在慢性瘙痒中作为单一疗法或与抗组胺药联合用于特定类型的瘙痒。在抗抑郁药中,三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)(69.29%)的处方最为常见,其次是选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)(32.29%)和5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)(9.14%)。其他治疗选择,如奥马珠单抗、沙利度胺、昂丹司琼、熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)和利福平,10%的受访者在特殊情况下用于缓解瘙痒。
本次调查揭示了印度皮肤科医生在慢性瘙痒中无论病因如何都开具抗组胺药的冗余做法。它还揭示了在学术和非学术机构中,在使用加巴喷丁类药物、阿片类拮抗剂和抗抑郁药等全身性药物方面存在差异。该调查强调了由于缺乏知识和经验、对副作用担心以及现有证据不足,在开具阿片类拮抗剂和SNRIs等全身性药物处方方面存在障碍。