Schudde Lauren T, Ryu Wonsun, Brown Raymond Stanley
Educational Leadership and Policy at the University of Texas at Austin.
Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin.
Rev High Ed. 2020 Winter;44(2):189-235. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2020.0044.
Evidence of inefficient course-taking patterns at community colleges has spurred policy conversations about how to ensure effective course sequences. Structural reforms, like guided pathways, seek to reduce major switching as a means to streamline student course taking and eliminate unnecessary credits. By placing students into broad fields of study-called meta-majors-and encouraging persistence within that general field (where coursework narrows toward a specific program over time), community colleges may help students progress toward their desired degree. But how often do students leave that meta-major, and what predicts meta-major switching? We use national data to examine meta-major switching at community colleges. Our findings suggest that almost 40 percent of students switch between meta-majors (eight broad major fields, plus undecided) between their first and third years of college. We describe the varied destinations and predictors across origin meta-majors and consider implications for colleges as they seek to assess ongoing reforms.
社区学院低效选课模式的证据引发了关于如何确保有效课程顺序的政策讨论。诸如引导式路径等结构性改革旨在减少专业转换,以此简化学生选课并消除不必要的学分。通过将学生安置在宽泛的学习领域——称为元专业——并鼓励他们在该一般领域内坚持学习(随着时间推移,课程会朝着特定项目逐渐细化),社区学院或许能帮助学生朝着他们期望的学位迈进。但是学生离开那个元专业的频率有多高,以及是什么因素预测了元专业转换呢?我们使用全国性数据来研究社区学院的元专业转换情况。我们的研究结果表明,近40%的学生在大学一年级到三年级期间会在元专业之间转换(八个宽泛的专业领域,加上未决定的情况)。我们描述了不同起始元专业的多样去向和预测因素,并考虑了这些因素对学院评估正在进行的改革的影响。