Suppr超能文献

他们是留下还是离开?进入非传统性别专业的个体的转换决策。

Do They Stay or Do They Go? The Switching Decisions of Individuals Who Enter Gender Atypical College Majors.

作者信息

Riegle-Crumb Catherine, King Barbara, Moore Chelsea

机构信息

Department of Curriculum and Instruction, and Department of Sociology (by courtesy), The University of Texas at Austin.

Department of Teaching and Learning, Florida International University.

出版信息

Sex Roles. 2016 May;74(9):436-449. doi: 10.1007/s11199-016-0583-4. Epub 2016 Jan 30.

Abstract

Drawing on prior theoretical and empirical research on gender segregation within educational fields as well as occupations, we examine the pathways of college students who at least initially embark on a gender-atypical path. Specifically, we explore whether women who enter fields that are male-dominated are more likely to switch fields than their female peers who have chosen other fields, as well as whether men who enter female-dominated majors are more likely to subsequently switch fields than their male peers who have chosen a more normative field. We utilize a sample of 3702 students from a nationally representative dataset on U.S. undergraduates, the Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study (BPS 2004/09). Logistic regression models examine the likelihood that students switch majors, controlling for students' social and academic background. Results reveal different patterns for men and women. Men who enter a female-dominated major are significantly more likely to switch majors than their male peers in other majors. By contrast, women in male-dominated fields are not more likely to switch fields compared to their female peers in other fields. The results are robust to supplementary analyses that include alternative specifications of the independent and dependent variables. The implications of our findings for the maintenance of gendered occupational segregation are discussed.

摘要

借鉴先前关于教育领域以及职业中性别隔离的理论和实证研究,我们考察了那些至少在初始阶段走上性别非典型道路的大学生的路径。具体而言,我们探究进入男性主导领域的女性是否比选择其他领域的女性同行更有可能转换领域,以及进入女性主导专业的男性随后是否比选择更常规领域的男性同行更有可能转换领域。我们使用了来自一个具有全国代表性的美国本科生数据集——高等教育新生纵向研究(BPS 2004/09)中的3702名学生样本。逻辑回归模型考察了学生转换专业的可能性,并控制了学生的社会和学术背景。结果揭示了男性和女性的不同模式。进入女性主导专业的男性比其他专业的男性同行更有可能转换专业。相比之下,与其他领域的女性同行相比,处于男性主导领域的女性转换领域的可能性并没有更高。这些结果在包括自变量和因变量的替代设定的补充分析中是稳健的。我们讨论了研究结果对维持性别化职业隔离的影响。

相似文献

1
Do They Stay or Do They Go? The Switching Decisions of Individuals Who Enter Gender Atypical College Majors.
Sex Roles. 2016 May;74(9):436-449. doi: 10.1007/s11199-016-0583-4. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
2
Examining High School Students' Gendered Beliefs about Math: Predictors and Implications for Choice of STEM College Majors.
Sociol Educ. 2021 Jul;94(3):227-248. doi: 10.1177/00380407211014777. Epub 2021 May 18.
3
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141. doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236.
5
First-Generation Students, College Majors, and Gendered Pathways.
Sociol Q. 2023;64(1):67-90. doi: 10.1080/00380253.2021.1989991. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
7
How Gender Segregation in Higher Education Contributes to Gender Segregation in the U.S. Labor Market.
Demography. 2023 Jun 1;60(3):761-784. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10653728.
8
Gendered Expectations: Examining How Peers Shape Female Students' Intent to Pursue STEM Fields.
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 15;8:329. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00329. eCollection 2017.
9
"College fields of study and substance use".
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 30;20(1):1631. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09722-1.
10
Gendered Pathways: How Mathematics Ability Beliefs Shape Secondary and Postsecondary Course and Degree Field Choices.
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 6;8:386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00386. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Major Movement: Examining Meta-Major Switching at Community Colleges.
Rev High Ed. 2020 Winter;44(2):189-235. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2020.0044.
3
Field-specific cultural capital and persistence in college majors.
Soc Sci Res. 2022 Mar;103:102654. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102654. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
4
Who Is Writing About Women in STEM in Higher Education in the United States? A Citation Analysis of Gendered Authorship.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 21;10:2979. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02979. eCollection 2019.
6

本文引用的文献

4
Trends in gender segregation in the choice of science and engineering majors.
Soc Sci Res. 2013 Nov;42(6):1519-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
5
The effect of manager exclusion on nurse turnover intention and care quality.
West J Nurs Res. 2013 Sep;35(8):970-85. doi: 10.1177/0193945913483880. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
6
Trends in Educational Attainment by Race/Ethnicity, Nativity, and Sex in the United States, 1989-2005.
Ethn Racial Stud. 2011;34(9):1543-1566. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2010.543139. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
7
Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Apr;102(4):700-17. doi: 10.1037/a0026659. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
8
Exploring the Changing Meaning of Work for American High School Seniors from 1976 to 2005.
Youth Soc. 2011 Sep 1;43(3):1110-1135. doi: 10.1177/0044118X10381367.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验