• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与基于全科医生(GP)的干预措施相关的背景和机制,以减少社区居住老年人的药物不良事件(ADE):一项快速现实主义综述

Contexts and mechanisms relevant to General Practitioner (GP) based interventions to reduce adverse drug events (ADE) in community dwelling older adults: a rapid realist review.

作者信息

Waldron Catherine, Hughes John, Wallace Emma, Cahir Caitriona, Bennett K

机构信息

Data Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, D02 DH60, Ireland.

Department of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2023 Dec 28;5:53. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13580.2. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13580.2
PMID:38283368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10811420/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults in Ireland are at increased risk of adverse drug events (ADE) due, in part, to increasing rates of polypharmacy. Interventions to reduce ADE in community dwelling older adults (CDOA) have had limited success, therefore, new approaches are required.A realist review uses a different lens to examine why and how interventions were supposed to work rather than if, they worked. A rapid realist review (RRR) is a more focused and accelerated version.The aim of this RRR is to identify and examine the contexts and mechanisms that play a role in the outcomes relevant to reducing ADE in CDOA in the GP setting that could inform the development of interventions in Ireland.

METHODS

Six candidate theories (CT) were developed, based on knowledge of the field and recent literature, in relation to how interventions are expected to work. These formed the search strategy. Eighty full texts from 633 abstracts were reviewed, of which 27 were included. Snowballing added a further five articles, relevant policy documents increased the total number to 45. Data were extracted relevant to the theories under iteratively developed sub-themes using NVivo software.

RESULTS

Of the six theories, three theories, relating to GP engagement in interventions, relevance of health policy documents for older adults, and shared decision-making, provided data to guide future interventions to reduce ADEs for CDOA in an Irish setting. There was insufficient data for two theories, a third was rejected as existing barriers in the Irish setting made it impractical to use.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve the success of Irish GP based interventions to reduce ADEs for CDOA, interventions must be relevant and easily applied in practice, supported by national policy and be adequately resourced. Future research is required to test our theories within a newly developed intervention.

摘要

背景

爱尔兰的老年人发生药物不良事件(ADE)的风险增加,部分原因是多重用药率不断上升。减少社区居住老年人(CDOA)药物不良事件的干预措施成效有限,因此需要新的方法。实证性综述采用不同的视角来审视干预措施为何以及如何发挥作用,而非其是否有效。快速实证性综述(RRR)是一种更具针对性且加速版的综述。本快速实证性综述的目的是识别和研究在全科医生(GP)环境中与减少CDOA药物不良事件相关的结果中起作用的背景和机制,为爱尔兰干预措施的制定提供参考。

方法

基于该领域的知识和近期文献,针对干预措施预期如何发挥作用,制定了六个候选理论(CT)。这些理论构成了搜索策略。对633篇摘要中的80篇全文进行了审查,其中27篇被纳入。通过滚雪球法又增加了五篇文章,相关政策文件使总数增至45篇。使用NVivo软件,针对迭代发展的子主题,提取与各理论相关的数据。

结果

在这六个理论中,有三个理论,即全科医生参与干预、健康政策文件对老年人的相关性以及共同决策,提供了数据以指导未来在爱尔兰环境中减少CDOA药物不良事件的干预措施。有两个理论的数据不足,第三个理论因爱尔兰环境中存在的障碍使其无法实际应用而被否决。

结论

为提高爱尔兰基于全科医生的干预措施减少CDOA药物不良事件的成功率,干预措施必须与实际相关且易于应用,得到国家政策的支持并有充足的资源。需要开展进一步研究,在新开发的干预措施中检验我们的理论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c10/10811452/8fb50b5ae88b/hrbopenres-5-15171-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c10/10811452/e3df375b33f6/hrbopenres-5-15171-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c10/10811452/8fb50b5ae88b/hrbopenres-5-15171-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c10/10811452/e3df375b33f6/hrbopenres-5-15171-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c10/10811452/8fb50b5ae88b/hrbopenres-5-15171-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Contexts and mechanisms relevant to General Practitioner (GP) based interventions to reduce adverse drug events (ADE) in community dwelling older adults: a rapid realist review.与基于全科医生(GP)的干预措施相关的背景和机制,以减少社区居住老年人的药物不良事件(ADE):一项快速现实主义综述
HRB Open Res. 2023 Dec 28;5:53. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13580.2. eCollection 2022.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Developing a framework for a novel multi-disciplinary, multi-agency intervention(s), to improve medication management in community-dwelling older people on complex medication regimens (MEMORABLE)--a realist synthesis.开发一个新的多学科、多机构干预框架,以改善复杂用药方案的社区居住老年人的药物管理(MEMORABLE)——一个现实主义的综合。
Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 3;6(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0528-1.
5
A realist review of which advocacy interventions work for which abused women under what circumstances.一项关于在何种情况下哪些宣传干预措施对哪些受虐待妇女有效的现实主义综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 29;6(6):CD013135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013135.pub2.
6
7
Why do acute healthcare staff behave unprofessionally towards each other and how can these behaviours be reduced? A realist review.医护人员之间为何会出现不专业的行为,又应如何减少此类行为?一项现实主义综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(25):1-195. doi: 10.3310/PAMV3758.
8
Strategies for older people living in care homes to prevent urinary tract infection: the StOP UTI realist synthesis.养老院内老年人预防尿路感染的策略:StOP UTI 现实综合研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(68):1-139. doi: 10.3310/DADT3410.
9
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等:一个现实主义综述和行动框架。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(7):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTWW7032.
10
Explanation of context, mechanisms and outcomes in adult community mental health crisis care: the MH-CREST realist evidence synthesis.成人社区心理健康危机护理中的背景、机制和结果解释:MH-CREST 真实证据综合研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(15):1-161. doi: 10.3310/TWKK5110.

引用本文的文献

1
Value Propositions for Digital Shared Medication Plans to Boost Patient-Health Care Professional Partnerships: Co-Design Study.促进患者与医疗保健专业人员合作的数字共享用药计划的价值主张:共同设计研究
J Particip Med. 2025 Jan 28;17:e50828. doi: 10.2196/50828.
2
Drug-Drug Interactions and Their Association with Adverse Health Outcomes in the Older Community-Dwelling Population: A Prospective Cohort Study.药物-药物相互作用及其与老年社区居民不良健康结局的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2024 Jun;44(6):439-453. doi: 10.1007/s40261-024-01369-9. Epub 2024 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
End-of-Life Care Preferences of Older Patients with Multimorbidity: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.患有多种疾病的老年患者的临终护理偏好:一项混合方法的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 29;10(1):91. doi: 10.3390/jcm10010091.
2
What do older adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy think about deprescribing? The LESS study - a primary care-based survey.患有多种合并症和多种药物治疗的老年人对减少药物治疗有何看法?LESS 研究 - 基于初级保健的调查。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 31;20(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01843-x.
3
Learning shared decision-making in clinical practice.
在临床实践中学习共同决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):1206-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.034. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study.评价全科药师(GPP)干预以优化爱尔兰初级保健中的处方:一项非随机试点研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 28;10(6):e035087. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035087.
5
Interventions to Reduce Adverse Drug Event-Related Outcomes in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.干预措施以减少老年人与药物不良事件相关的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drugs Aging. 2020 Feb;37(2):91-98. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00738-w.
6
Health-related preferences of older patients with multimorbidity: an evidence map.患有多种疾病的老年患者的健康相关偏好:一项证据图谱
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e034485. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034485.
7
GP-Led Deprescribing in Community-Living Older Australians: An Exploratory Controlled Trial.以全科医生为主导的社区居住老年澳大利亚人药物减量:一项探索性对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):403-410. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16273. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
8
Assessing risk of adverse drug reactions in the elderly: a feasibility study.评估老年人药物不良反应风险:一项可行性研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Dec;41(6):1483-1490. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00908-1. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
9
Contemporary Educational Interventions for General Practitioners (GPs) in Primary Care Settings in Australia: A Systematic Literature Review.澳大利亚基层医疗环境中全科医生的当代教育干预措施:一项系统文献综述
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 27;7:176. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00176. eCollection 2019.
10
Polypharmacy: Evaluating Risks and Deprescribing.多药治疗:评估风险和减少药物。
Am Fam Physician. 2019 Jul 1;100(1):32-38.