Suppr超能文献

使用临床止血生物检验评估局部止血剂。

Use of clinical biological tests of haemostasis to evaluate topical haemostatics.

机构信息

Nantes Université, Oniris, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton, RMeS, UMR 1229, F-44000, Nantes, France.

Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Pharmacie, F-44000, Nantes, France.

出版信息

Int J Lab Hematol. 2024 Jun;46(3):531-537. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.14235. Epub 2024 Jan 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In addition to traditional means, topical haemostatics are currently used to avoid haemorrhage during surgery. Although they have been reported to be effective, there is a low level of proof of their clinical efficacy, which is at odds with their levels of use. This study used two methods to better understand their in vitro mechanism of action.

METHODS

Two clinical biology assays were used to measure the action of topical haemostatics on primary and secondary haemostasis. Calibrated samples of collagen sponges and polypropylene non-woven gauze were tested. Platelet aggregation was assessed using a multichannel aggregometer. A thrombin generation assay (TGA) was used with a fluorogenic readout. Tissue factor solutions were used to activate coagulation.

RESULTS

In terms of primary haemostasis, collagen sponges stimulated platelet aggregation, in particular between 2 and 5 min after incubation with platelet-rich plasma and with no dose effect. In regard to coagulation, the kinetics of thrombin generation was enhanced. Polypropylene non-woven gauze did not exhibit any effect on platelet aggregation, although it did have a weak effect on the kinetics of thrombin generation.

CONCLUSION

Collagen is well known to exert a haemostatic effect due to its action on platelet aggregation. By contrast, polypropylene non-woven gauze has not been shown to have any effect on platelet aggregation other than a minor impact on thrombin generation. The results obtained with the devices tested are in agreement with the literature. Platelet aggregation biological assays and TGA measurements appear to be suitable for evaluation of these medical products.

摘要

简介

除了传统方法外,目前还使用局部止血剂来避免手术中的出血。尽管已经报道它们是有效的,但它们的临床疗效证据水平较低,这与其使用水平不符。本研究使用两种方法来更好地了解它们的体外作用机制。

方法

使用两种临床生物学测定法来测量局部止血剂对初级和次级止血的作用。测试了校准的胶原蛋白海绵和聚丙烯无纺纱布样本。使用多通道聚集仪评估血小板聚集。使用荧光法进行凝血酶生成测定(TGA)。使用组织因子溶液激活凝血。

结果

在初级止血方面,胶原蛋白海绵刺激血小板聚集,特别是在与富含血小板的血浆孵育 2 至 5 分钟后,并且没有剂量效应。关于凝血,凝血酶生成的动力学得到增强。聚丙烯无纺纱布对血小板聚集没有任何影响,尽管它对凝血酶生成的动力学有微弱影响。

结论

胶原蛋白由于其对血小板聚集的作用而具有止血作用。相比之下,聚丙烯无纺纱布除了对凝血酶生成有轻微影响外,对血小板聚集没有任何作用。测试设备的结果与文献一致。血小板聚集生物测定法和 TGA 测量似乎适合评估这些医疗产品。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验