Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
University of Münster, Germany.
Assessment. 2024 Oct;31(7):1472-1492. doi: 10.1177/10731911231220357. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
In typical Dark Triad (DT) questionnaires, generic items oftentimes refer to "others" or "people" in general. Hence, respondents have to mentally aggregate their behavior across several kinds of "others" (e.g., work colleagues, family members, and friends). It remains unknown if individuals consider different kinds of interaction partners equally or if their self-reports contain "hidden" interaction partner-specific tendencies. To shed light on this issue, we assessed generic and contextualized DT items (referring to family, friends, work, and strangers; = 814 from the general population). The correlated trait-correlated (method - 1) model was used to investigate preregistered research questions. On average, generic DT items showed the strongest association with work-contextualized DT items and the weakest association with family-contextualized DT items. However, the associations varied considerably across DT items and traits. In sum, our results suggest that hidden framings exist in some DT items, which may impact their ability to predict relevant criteria due to contextual (a)symmetries. The generalizability of the findings to other DT instruments, items, and participant groups should be examined in future research.
在典型的黑暗人格三联征(DT)问卷中,通用项目通常指的是“他人”或“一般人”。因此,被试者必须在心理上将他们的行为综合到几种“他人”(例如,同事、家庭成员和朋友)中。目前还不清楚个体是否平等地考虑不同类型的互动伙伴,或者他们的自我报告是否包含“隐藏的”互动伙伴特定倾向。为了阐明这个问题,我们评估了通用和情境化的 DT 项目(涉及家庭、朋友、工作和陌生人; = 814 名普通人群)。相关特质相关(方法 1)模型用于研究预先注册的研究问题。平均而言,通用 DT 项目与工作情境化 DT 项目的关联最强,与家庭情境化 DT 项目的关联最弱。然而,这些关联在 DT 项目和特质之间差异很大。总之,我们的结果表明,一些 DT 项目中存在隐藏的框架,这可能会由于情境(非)对称而影响它们预测相关标准的能力。未来的研究应检验这些发现对其他 DT 工具、项目和参与者群体的可推广性。