• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

揭示黑暗三人格自评中的隐藏框架:当人们回答通用黑暗三人格项目时,他们使用哪些参照框架?

Uncovering Hidden Framings in Dark Triad Self-Ratings: What Frames-of-Reference Do People Use When Responding to Generic Dark Triad Items?

机构信息

Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.

University of Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Assessment. 2024 Oct;31(7):1472-1492. doi: 10.1177/10731911231220357. Epub 2024 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1177/10731911231220357
PMID:38284352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11411850/
Abstract

In typical Dark Triad (DT) questionnaires, generic items oftentimes refer to "others" or "people" in general. Hence, respondents have to mentally aggregate their behavior across several kinds of "others" (e.g., work colleagues, family members, and friends). It remains unknown if individuals consider different kinds of interaction partners equally or if their self-reports contain "hidden" interaction partner-specific tendencies. To shed light on this issue, we assessed generic and contextualized DT items (referring to family, friends, work, and strangers; = 814 from the general population). The correlated trait-correlated (method - 1) model was used to investigate preregistered research questions. On average, generic DT items showed the strongest association with work-contextualized DT items and the weakest association with family-contextualized DT items. However, the associations varied considerably across DT items and traits. In sum, our results suggest that hidden framings exist in some DT items, which may impact their ability to predict relevant criteria due to contextual (a)symmetries. The generalizability of the findings to other DT instruments, items, and participant groups should be examined in future research.

摘要

在典型的黑暗人格三联征(DT)问卷中,通用项目通常指的是“他人”或“一般人”。因此,被试者必须在心理上将他们的行为综合到几种“他人”(例如,同事、家庭成员和朋友)中。目前还不清楚个体是否平等地考虑不同类型的互动伙伴,或者他们的自我报告是否包含“隐藏的”互动伙伴特定倾向。为了阐明这个问题,我们评估了通用和情境化的 DT 项目(涉及家庭、朋友、工作和陌生人; = 814 名普通人群)。相关特质相关(方法 1)模型用于研究预先注册的研究问题。平均而言,通用 DT 项目与工作情境化 DT 项目的关联最强,与家庭情境化 DT 项目的关联最弱。然而,这些关联在 DT 项目和特质之间差异很大。总之,我们的结果表明,一些 DT 项目中存在隐藏的框架,这可能会由于情境(非)对称而影响它们预测相关标准的能力。未来的研究应检验这些发现对其他 DT 工具、项目和参与者群体的可推广性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/73bc24fe63fc/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/3f1b84dab91c/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/53351fe37b34/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/a8218f427ffd/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/938c9b413239/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/06eb080eed60/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/515ed2f15f45/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/3c6038b731fd/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/73bc24fe63fc/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/3f1b84dab91c/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/53351fe37b34/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/a8218f427ffd/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/938c9b413239/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/06eb080eed60/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/515ed2f15f45/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/3c6038b731fd/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c14/11411850/73bc24fe63fc/10.1177_10731911231220357-fig8.jpg

相似文献

1
Uncovering Hidden Framings in Dark Triad Self-Ratings: What Frames-of-Reference Do People Use When Responding to Generic Dark Triad Items?揭示黑暗三人格自评中的隐藏框架:当人们回答通用黑暗三人格项目时,他们使用哪些参照框架?
Assessment. 2024 Oct;31(7):1472-1492. doi: 10.1177/10731911231220357. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
"I Wish This Tool Was Available to Me Sooner": Piloting a Workplace Autism Disclosure Decision-Aid Tool for Autistic Youth and Young Adults.“真希望这个工具能早点提供给我”:为自闭症青少年和青年试行职场自闭症披露决策辅助工具
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):331-344. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0054. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
10
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Five-Factor Model Antagonistic Triad Measure.五因素模型对立三联征量表的验证。
Assessment. 2023 Apr;30(3):782-797. doi: 10.1177/10731911211068083. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
2
Does Machiavellianism meaningfully differ from psychopathy? It depends.马基雅维利主义与精神变态有显著差异吗?这要看情况。
Behav Sci Law. 2021 Oct;39(5):663-677. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2538. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
3
Do method effects generalize across traits (and what if they don't)?方法效应是否会在特质之间泛化(如果不是,该怎么办)?
J Pers. 2021 May;89(3):382-401. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12625. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
Hidden framings and hidden asymmetries in the measurement of personality--A combined lens-model and frame-of-reference perspective.人格测量中的隐性框架和隐性不对称——一种综合镜头模型和参照框架的观点。
J Pers. 2021 Apr;89(2):357-375. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12586. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
5
Tapped out or barely tapped? Recommendations for how to harness the vast and largely unused potential of the Mechanical Turk participant pool.已枯竭还是尚未充分开发?关于如何利用 Mechanical Turk 参与者群体这一巨大但尚未充分开发的潜力的建议。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 16;14(12):e0226394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226394. eCollection 2019.
6
The "core" of the dark triad: A test of competing hypotheses.黑暗人格三联征的“核心”:对竞争假说的检验。
Personal Disord. 2020 Mar;11(2):91-99. doi: 10.1037/per0000386. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
7
Quantitative Data From Rating Scales: An Epistemological and Methodological Enquiry.评分量表的定量数据:一项认识论与方法论探究
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 21;9:2599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02599. eCollection 2018.
8
The Malevolent Side of Human Nature.人性的阴暗面
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Mar;12(2):183-204. doi: 10.1177/1745691616666070.
9
Developing a Taxonomy of Dark Triad Triggers at Work - A Grounded Theory Study Protocol.构建工作场所黑暗三联征触发因素的分类法——一项扎根理论研究方案
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 7;8:293. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00293. eCollection 2017.
10
Differences among dark triad components: A meta-analytic investigation.黑暗三人格特质的差异:一项元分析研究。
Personal Disord. 2018 Mar;9(2):101-111. doi: 10.1037/per0000222. Epub 2016 Oct 13.