• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估基于农田土壤的和混合生物过滤器在减少甲烷方面的性能。

Assessing the performance of farm soil-based and hybrid biofilters for methane abatement.

机构信息

Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

出版信息

Environ Technol. 2024 Nov;45(26):5758-5772. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2024.2306796. Epub 2024 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1080/09593330.2024.2306796
PMID:38286151
Abstract

Mitigating methane (CH) emissions using methanotrophs (methane-oxidizing bacteria, MOB), is a simple, energy efficient and cheap technology. The abundance and distribution of MOB in the environmental samples is critical for efficient removal of emitted CH from any source. This study evaluated the performance of farm soils without and with cheap, easily accessible bulking materials as sustainable hybrid biofilter media. Soil-only biofilters removed up to 865 ± 19 g CH m d with well-drained organic carbon-rich soils compared with 264 ± 14 g CH m d for poorly drained soil. The removal efficiency decreased with increasing flow rate (0.16→0.24 L min) and subsequent priming could not return soil biofilters to their previous removal rate.Hybrid biofilters using organic, carbon-rich soils and compost removed up to 2698 g CH m d (flow rate 0.35 L min). Increasing CH flow rates also reduced their efficiency, but the hybrid biofilters with compost quickly regained most of their efficiency and removed up to 2262 g CH m d (flow rate 0.3 L min) after remixing of biofilter media. These results show that hybrid biofilters removed higher CH than soil-only biofilters and were also more resilient. The MOB gene abundance results complement the CH removal capacity of both soil-only and hybrid biofilter materials used. The more aerobic, carbon-rich soils had more abundant MOB than the poorly drained soil. The most porous hybrid biofilter with compost and more available nutrients to sustain bacterial growth and activity had the highest MOB abundance and removed the most CH.

摘要

利用甲烷营养菌(甲烷氧化菌,MOB)来减少甲烷(CH)排放是一种简单、节能且廉价的技术。在环境样本中,MOB 的丰度和分布对于从任何来源有效地去除排放的 CH 至关重要。本研究评估了没有廉价、易于获得的填充材料的农田土壤的性能,作为可持续的混合生物过滤介质。与排水不良的土壤相比,具有良好排水功能的富含有机碳的土壤中的土壤生物过滤器可去除高达 865±19 g CH m d,而排水不良的土壤中可去除 264±14 g CH m d。去除效率随流速(0.16→0.24 L min)的增加而降低,随后的启动不能使土壤生物过滤器恢复到之前的去除速率。使用有机、富碳土壤和堆肥的混合生物过滤器可去除高达 2698 g CH m d(流速为 0.35 L min)。增加 CH 流速也降低了它们的效率,但混合生物过滤器与堆肥快速恢复了大部分效率,在重新混合生物过滤介质后,可去除高达 2262 g CH m d(流速为 0.3 L min)。这些结果表明,混合生物过滤器去除的 CH 比仅用土壤的生物过滤器多,并且更具弹性。MOB 基因丰度结果补充了仅用土壤和混合生物过滤材料的 CH 去除能力。更需氧、富碳的土壤比排水不良的土壤具有更多的 MOB。具有最高 MOB 丰度并去除最多 CH 的混合生物过滤器是最具多孔性的,其中含有堆肥和更多的可用养分来维持细菌的生长和活性。

相似文献

1
Assessing the performance of farm soil-based and hybrid biofilters for methane abatement.评估基于农田土壤的和混合生物过滤器在减少甲烷方面的性能。
Environ Technol. 2024 Nov;45(26):5758-5772. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2024.2306796. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
2
Assessment of farm soil, biochar, compost and weathered pine mulch to mitigate methane emissions.评估农田土壤、生物炭、堆肥和风化松针覆盖物对甲烷排放的缓解作用。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Nov;100(21):9365-9379. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7794-z. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
3
Biofiltration of methane using hybrid mixtures of biochar, lava rock and compost.利用生物炭、火山岩和堆肥的混合混合物进行甲烷的生物过滤。
Environ Pollut. 2018 Oct;241:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.039. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Testing a biofilter cover design to mitigate dairy effluent pond methane emissions.测试生物滤池覆盖设计以减轻奶牛废水池塘甲烷排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Jan 2;47(1):526-32. doi: 10.1021/es303225h. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
5
Assessing the Performance of Floating Biofilters for Oxidation of Methane from Dairy Effluent Ponds.评估漂浮式生物滤池对奶牛场废水塘中甲烷氧化的性能。
J Environ Qual. 2017 Mar;46(2):272-280. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.08.0310.
6
Methane oxidation in water-spreading and compost biofilters.水扩散生物滤池和堆肥生物滤池中甲烷的氧化作用。
Waste Manag Res. 2006 Dec;24(6):528-36. doi: 10.1177/0734242X06065704.
7
Enhanced methane oxidation efficiency by digestate biochar in landfill cover soil: Microbial shifts and carbon metabolites insights.沼渣生物炭提高垃圾填埋场覆盖土壤中甲烷氧化效率:微生物群落变化及碳代谢产物解析
Chemosphere. 2023 Dec;343:140279. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140279. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
8
High Temporal and Spatial Variability of Atmospheric-Methane Oxidation in Alpine Glacier Forefield Soils.高山冰川前缘土壤中大气甲烷氧化的高时空变异性
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Aug 31;83(18). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01139-17. Print 2017 Sep 15.
9
Treatment of landfill gas with low methane content by biocover systems.采用生物覆盖系统处理低甲烷含量的垃圾填埋气。
Waste Manag. 2019 Feb 1;84:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
10
The effect of various environmental and design parameters on methane oxidation in a model biofilter.各种环境和设计参数对模型生物滤池中甲烷氧化的影响。
Waste Manag Res. 2002 Oct;20(5):434-44. doi: 10.1177/0734242X0202000507.