Suppr超能文献

日常情感动态与抑郁、广泛性焦虑和社交焦虑症状的纵向关联。

Longitudinal associations of daily affective dynamics with depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety symptoms.

作者信息

Lakhtakia Tanvi, Smith Shannon R, Mohr David C, Stamatis Caitlin A

机构信息

Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, United States of America.

Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, United States of America.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2024 May 1;352:437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.250. Epub 2024 Jan 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low average affect, measured using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), has been consistently linked with depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety, supporting trait-like negative affect as a shared underlying feature. However, while theoretical models of emotion regulation would also implicate greater variability in daily affect in these conditions, empirical evidence linking EMA of mood variability with affective disorders is mixed. We used multilevel modeling to test relationships of daily mood and mood variability with depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety symptoms.

METHODS

Participants (N = 1004; 72.31 % female; M = 40.85) responded to EMA of mood 2-3×/day and completed measures of depression (PHQ-8), generalized anxiety (GAD-7), and social anxiety (SPIN) every three weeks.

RESULTS

Lower mean affect predicted all symptoms at both the between-person (PHQ-8: β = -0.486, p < 0.001; GAD-7: β = -0.429, p < 0.001; SPIN: β = -0.284, p < 0.001) and within-person (PHQ-8: β = -0.219, p < 0.001; GAD-7: β = -0.196, p < 0.001; SPIN: β = -0.049, p < 0.001) levels. Similarly, at the between-person level, greater affective variability was linked with all three clinical symptoms (PHQ-8: β = 0.617, p < 0.001; GAD-7: β = 0.703, p < 0.001; SPIN: β = 0.449, p < 0.001). However, within-person, affective variability related to depression (β = 0.144, p < 0.001) and generalized anxiety (β = 0.150, p < 0.001), but not social anxiety (β = 0.006, p = 0.712).

LIMITATIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period occurred midway through the study.

CONCLUSION

Findings point to common and specific emotion dynamics that characterize affective symptoms severity, with implications for affective monitoring in a clinical context.

摘要

背景

使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)测量的低平均情感一直与抑郁症、广泛性焦虑症和社交焦虑症相关联,支持特质性负面情感作为一个共同的潜在特征。然而,虽然情绪调节的理论模型也表明在这些情况下日常情感的变异性更大,但将情绪变异性的EMA与情感障碍联系起来的实证证据并不一致。我们使用多层次建模来测试日常情绪和情绪变异性与抑郁症、广泛性焦虑症和社交焦虑症症状之间的关系。

方法

参与者(N = 1004;72.31%为女性;M = 40.85)每天2 - 3次对情绪进行EMA回应,并每三周完成一次抑郁症(PHQ - 8)、广泛性焦虑症(GAD - 7)和社交焦虑症(SPIN)的测量。

结果

较低的平均情感在个体间(PHQ - 8:β = -0.486,p < 0.001;GAD - 7:β = -0.429,p < 0.001;SPIN:β = -0.284,p < 0.001)和个体内(PHQ - 8:β = -0.219,p < 0.001;GAD - 7:β = -0.196,p < 0.001;SPIN:β = -0.049,p < 0.001)水平上均能预测所有症状。同样,在个体间水平上,更大的情感变异性与所有三种临床症状相关(PHQ - 8:β = 0.617,p < 0.001;GAD - 7:β = 0.703,p < 0.001;SPIN:β = 0.449,p < 0.001)。然而,在个体内,情感变异性与抑郁症(β = 0.144,p < 0.001)和广泛性焦虑症(β = 0.150,p < 0.001)相关,但与社交焦虑症无关(β = 0.006,p = 0.712)。

局限性

COVID - 19大流行封锁期在研究进行到一半时发生。

结论

研究结果指出了表征情感症状严重程度的共同和特定情绪动态,对临床背景下的情感监测具有启示意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验