Lakhtakia Tanvi, Smith Shannon R, Mohr David C, Stamatis Caitlin A
Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, United States of America.
Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, United States of America.
J Affect Disord. 2024 May 1;352:437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.250. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
Low average affect, measured using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), has been consistently linked with depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety, supporting trait-like negative affect as a shared underlying feature. However, while theoretical models of emotion regulation would also implicate greater variability in daily affect in these conditions, empirical evidence linking EMA of mood variability with affective disorders is mixed. We used multilevel modeling to test relationships of daily mood and mood variability with depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety symptoms.
Participants (N = 1004; 72.31 % female; M = 40.85) responded to EMA of mood 2-3×/day and completed measures of depression (PHQ-8), generalized anxiety (GAD-7), and social anxiety (SPIN) every three weeks.
Lower mean affect predicted all symptoms at both the between-person (PHQ-8: β = -0.486, p < 0.001; GAD-7: β = -0.429, p < 0.001; SPIN: β = -0.284, p < 0.001) and within-person (PHQ-8: β = -0.219, p < 0.001; GAD-7: β = -0.196, p < 0.001; SPIN: β = -0.049, p < 0.001) levels. Similarly, at the between-person level, greater affective variability was linked with all three clinical symptoms (PHQ-8: β = 0.617, p < 0.001; GAD-7: β = 0.703, p < 0.001; SPIN: β = 0.449, p < 0.001). However, within-person, affective variability related to depression (β = 0.144, p < 0.001) and generalized anxiety (β = 0.150, p < 0.001), but not social anxiety (β = 0.006, p = 0.712).
The COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period occurred midway through the study.
Findings point to common and specific emotion dynamics that characterize affective symptoms severity, with implications for affective monitoring in a clinical context.
使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)测量的低平均情感一直与抑郁症、广泛性焦虑症和社交焦虑症相关联,支持特质性负面情感作为一个共同的潜在特征。然而,虽然情绪调节的理论模型也表明在这些情况下日常情感的变异性更大,但将情绪变异性的EMA与情感障碍联系起来的实证证据并不一致。我们使用多层次建模来测试日常情绪和情绪变异性与抑郁症、广泛性焦虑症和社交焦虑症症状之间的关系。
参与者(N = 1004;72.31%为女性;M = 40.85)每天2 - 3次对情绪进行EMA回应,并每三周完成一次抑郁症(PHQ - 8)、广泛性焦虑症(GAD - 7)和社交焦虑症(SPIN)的测量。
较低的平均情感在个体间(PHQ - 8:β = -0.486,p < 0.001;GAD - 7:β = -0.429,p < 0.001;SPIN:β = -0.284,p < 0.001)和个体内(PHQ - 8:β = -0.219,p < 0.001;GAD - 7:β = -0.196,p < 0.001;SPIN:β = -0.049,p < 0.001)水平上均能预测所有症状。同样,在个体间水平上,更大的情感变异性与所有三种临床症状相关(PHQ - 8:β = 0.617,p < 0.001;GAD - 7:β = 0.703,p < 0.001;SPIN:β = 0.449,p < 0.001)。然而,在个体内,情感变异性与抑郁症(β = 0.144,p < 0.001)和广泛性焦虑症(β = 0.150,p < 0.001)相关,但与社交焦虑症无关(β = 0.006,p = 0.712)。
COVID - 19大流行封锁期在研究进行到一半时发生。
研究结果指出了表征情感症状严重程度的共同和特定情绪动态,对临床背景下的情感监测具有启示意义。