Honarbakhsh Shohreh, Roney Caroline, Wharmby Amy, Vidal Horrach Caterina, Hunter Ross J
Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Jun;21(6):752-761. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.01.039. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
Focal and rotational activations have been demonstrated in atrial fibrillation (AF), but their relationship to each other and to structural remodeling remains unclear.
The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of focal and rotational activations to underlying low-voltage zones (LVZs) (<0.5 mV) and to determine whether there was a temporal (≤500 ms) and spatial (≤12 mm) relationship between these activations.
Patients undergoing catheter ablation for persistent AF were included. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation. Unipolar signals were collected to identify focal and rotational activations using a wavefront propagation algorithm.
In 40 patients, 105 activations were identified (57 [54.3%] focal; 48 [45.7%] rotational). Rotational activations were co-localized to LVZs (35/48 [72.9%]) whereas focal activations were not (11/57 in LVZ [19.3%]; P <.001). The proportion of the left atrium occupied by LVZs predicted rotational activations occurrence (area under the curve 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.00; P <.001). In patients with a relatively healthy atrium, in which the atrium consisted of ≤15% LVZs, only focal activations were identified. Thirty-two of the 35 rotational activations (91.4%) located in LVZs also showed a temporal and spatial relationship to a focal activation. The presence of a LVZ within 12 mm of the focal activation was a strong predictor for whether a paired rotational activation would also occur in that vicinity.
Rotational activations are largely confined to areas of structural remodeling and have a clear spatial and temporal relationship with focal activations suggesting they are dependent on them. These novel mechanistic observations outline a plausible model for patient-specific mechanisms maintaining AF.
在心房颤动(AF)中已证实存在局灶性和旋转性激动,但它们彼此之间以及与结构重塑的关系仍不清楚。
本研究旨在评估局灶性和旋转性激动与潜在低电压区(LVZs,<0.5 mV)的关系,并确定这些激动之间是否存在时间(≤500 ms)和空间(≤12 mm)关系。
纳入接受持续性AF导管消融的患者。所有患者均接受肺静脉隔离。使用波前传播算法收集单极信号以识别局灶性和旋转性激动。
在40例患者中,共识别出105次激动(57次[54.3%]局灶性;48次[45.7%]旋转性)。旋转性激动与LVZs共定位(35/48 [72.9%]),而局灶性激动则不然(LVZ中11/57 [19.3%];P <.001)。LVZs占据左心房的比例可预测旋转性激动的发生(曲线下面积0.96;95%置信区间0.90 - 1.00;P <.001)。在心房相对健康(心房由≤15%的LVZs组成)的患者中,仅识别出局灶性激动。位于LVZs的35次旋转性激动中的32次(91.4%)也显示出与局灶性激动存在时间和空间关系。局灶性激动12 mm范围内存在LVZ是配对旋转性激动是否也会在该附近发生的有力预测指标。
旋转性激动主要局限于结构重塑区域,并且与局灶性激动具有明确的空间和时间关系,表明它们依赖于局灶性激动。这些新的机制观察结果勾勒出一个关于维持AF的患者特异性机制的合理模型。