Yin Hao, Li Yan, Zhao Gai, Xie Jie, Ning Ren-de, Zhou En-Chang
Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230061, Anhui, China.
Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing 252600, Shandong, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2024 Jan 25;37(1):57-60. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20221010.
To compare the biomechanical stability of three cross-bridge headless compression screws and locking plates in the fixation of Mason type Ⅲ radial head fractures by finite element method.
Using reverse modeling technology, the radial CT data and internal fixation data of a healthy 25-year-old male were imported into the relevant software. Three-dimensional finite element model of 3 cross-bridge headless compression screws and locking plates for MasonⅢ radial head fractures were established, and the radial head was loaded with 100 N axial loading. The maximum displacement, maximum Von Mises stress and stress distribution of the two groups were compared.
The maximum displacements of the three cross-bridge screws group and locking plate group were 0.069 mm and 0.087 mm respectively, and the Von Mises stress peaks were 18.59 MPa and 31.85 MPa respectively. The stress distribution of the three screws group was more uniform.
Both internal fixation methods can provide good fixation effect. CoMPared with the locking plate fixation method, the 3 cross-bridge headless compression screws fixation is more stable and the stress distribution is more uniform.
采用有限元方法比较三种跨桥无头加压螺钉与锁定钢板在MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折固定中的生物力学稳定性。
利用逆向建模技术,将一名25岁健康男性的桡骨CT数据和内固定数据导入相关软件。建立用于MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折的3种跨桥无头加压螺钉与锁定钢板的三维有限元模型,并对桡骨头施加100 N轴向载荷。比较两组的最大位移、最大von Mises应力及应力分布。
三种跨桥螺钉组和锁定钢板组的最大位移分别为0.069 mm和0.087 mm,von Mises应力峰值分别为18.59 MPa和31.85 MPa。三种螺钉组的应力分布更均匀。
两种内固定方法均可提供良好的固定效果。与锁定钢板固定方法相比,3种跨桥无头加压螺钉固定更稳定,应力分布更均匀。