Suppr超能文献

对不同收入水平国家的青少年中,世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》烟草广告、促销和赞助禁令的实施与当前电子烟使用之间关联的横断面研究。

Cross-sectional study of the associations between the implementation of the WHO FCTC tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship bans and current e-cigarette use among youth from countries with different income levels.

作者信息

Ylitörmänen Tuija, Tarasenko Yelena, Hiilamo Heikki, Ruokolainen Otto, Puska Pekka, Ollila Hanna

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland

Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2024 Jan 29. doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058160.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) Article 13 requires countries to ban tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS), and bans are recommended to cover electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). We examined youth e-cigarette prevalence by TAPS regulations in countries with different income levels.

METHODS

We analysed data on 165 299 respondents from 48 countries with 2016/2018 WHO FCTC implementation reports and 2016-2019 Global Youth Tobacco Survey. We used multilevel logistic regressions to examine associations between TAPS regulations and current e-cigarette use, stratified by country income.

RESULTS

About 1 in 10 respondents was currently using e-cigarettes. Respondents in countries with TAPS bans on the internet were less likely to use e-cigarettes (adjOR=0.58; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.86) than youth in countries without such bans. In lower middle-income and low-income countries, bans on displaying tobacco products at the point of sale (adjOR=0.55; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.90), bans on product placement (adjOR=0.44; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.69) and strength of additional TAPS measures were associated with lower prevalence of e-cigarette use among students. Being taught about the dangers of the use of tobacco in school was associated with lower odds of e-cigarette use. No differences in the use of e-cigarettes were observed by types of TAPS among respondents in high-income countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Strengthening implementation of TAPS policies and assuring they cover new and emerging products, online channels and points of sales are essential, especially in lower income countries. Maintaining tobacco health education is also important to protect youth from e-cigarette use.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》(WHO FCTC)第13条要求各国禁止烟草广告、促销和赞助(TAPS),并建议禁令涵盖电子烟。我们根据不同收入水平国家的TAPS法规,研究了青少年电子烟流行情况。

方法

我们分析了来自48个国家的165299名受访者的数据,这些数据来自2016/2018年WHO FCTC实施报告以及2016 - 2019年全球青少年烟草调查。我们使用多水平逻辑回归分析按国家收入分层的TAPS法规与当前电子烟使用之间的关联。

结果

约十分之一的受访者目前正在使用电子烟。在互联网上实施TAPS禁令的国家中,受访者使用电子烟的可能性(调整后比值比[adjOR]=0.58;95%置信区间[CI]为0.39至0.86)低于没有此类禁令的国家的青少年。在中低收入和低收入国家,禁止在销售点展示烟草制品(adjOR=0.55;95% CI为0.34至0.90)、禁止产品植入(adjOR=0.44;95% CI为0.28至0.69)以及其他TAPS措施的力度与学生中电子烟使用流行率较低相关。在学校接受过烟草使用危害教育与较低的电子烟使用几率相关。在高收入国家的受访者中,未观察到不同类型TAPS在电子烟使用方面的差异。

结论

加强TAPS政策的实施并确保其涵盖新出现的产品、在线渠道和销售点至关重要,尤其是在低收入国家。持续开展烟草健康教育对于保护青少年不使用电子烟也很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验