Suppr超能文献

干燥综合征相关终点综合指标(CRESS):一种新型结局指标的制定与验证

Composite of Relevant Endpoints for Sjögren's Syndrome (CRESS): development and validation of a novel outcome measure.

作者信息

Arends Suzanne, de Wolff Liseth, van Nimwegen Jolien F, Verstappen Gwenny M P J, Vehof Jelle, Bombardieri Michele, Bowman Simon J, Pontarini Elena, Baer Alan N, Nys Marleen, Gottenberg Jacques-Eric, Felten Renaud, Ray Neelanjana, Vissink Arjan, Kroese Frans G M, Bootsma Hendrika

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Rheumatol. 2021 Aug;3(8):e553-e562. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00122-3. Epub 2021 May 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in primary Sjögren's syndrome used the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) as their primary endpoint. Given the heterogeneous and complex nature of primary Sjögren's syndrome, it might be more appropriate to also assess other clinically relevant disease features. We aimed to develop a novel composite endpoint for assessing treatment efficacy in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome: the Composite of Relevant Endpoints for Sjögren's Syndrome (CRESS).

METHODS

A multidisciplinary expert team selected clinically relevant items and candidate measurements for inclusion in the composite score. For each measurement, cutoff points for response to treatment were chosen based on expert opinion, previously published data on minimal clinically important improvements, and trial data, primarily the week-24 data of the single-centre ASAP-III trial of abatacept versus placebo. CRESS was validated using data from three independent RCTs: one trial of rituximab (TRACTISS), one of abatacept (multinational trial), and one of tocilizumab (ETAP). We calculated the number and percentage of patients who were responders in the separate CRESS items, and the percentage of responders based on the total CRESS at the primary endpoint visits (week 48 for TRACTISS, week 24 for the other two trials). Patients with fewer than three items available for evaluating CRESS response were imputed as non-responders.

FINDINGS

Based on expert opinion, five complementary items were selected to assess response: (1) systemic disease activity by Clinical ESSDAI (less than 5 points); (2) patient-reported symptoms by EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, assessed by a decrease of at least 1 point or at least 15% from baseline; (3) tear gland item by Schirmer's test and ocular staining score, assessed by an increase of at least 5 mm or decrease of at least 2 points, respectively, in patients with abnormal Schirmer's test or ocular staining score findings at baseline, or, in patients with normal baseline values, assessed by no change to abnormal for both; (4) salivary gland item, assessed by unstimulated whole saliva secretion (increase of at least 25%) and salivary gland ultrasonography (decrease of at least 25%); and (5) serology, assessed by rheumatoid factor (decrease of at least 25%) and IgG (decrease of at least 10%). Total CRESS response is defined as response on at least three of five items. Post-hoc assessment of phase 3 trial data showed that CRESS response rates at the primary endpoint visits were 60% (24 of 40) for abatacept versus 18% (seven of 39) for placebo (p<0·0001) in ASAP-III, 49% (33 of 67) for rituximab versus 30% (20 of 66) for placebo (p=0·026) in the TRACTISS trial, 45% (41 of 92) for abatacept versus 32% (30 of 95) for placebo (p=0·067) in the multinational abatacept trial, and 18% (10 of 55) for tocilizumab versus 24% (13 of 55) for placebo (p=0·48) in the ETAP trial.

INTERPRETATION

The CRESS is a feasible, well-balanced, composite endpoint for use in trials of primary Sjögren's syndrome. As a next step, the CRESS will require validation in a prospective RCT.

FUNDING

None.

TRANSLATION

For the Dutch translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

摘要

背景

近期关于原发性干燥综合征的随机对照试验(RCT)将欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)干燥综合征疾病活动指数(ESSDAI)作为主要终点。鉴于原发性干燥综合征的异质性和复杂性,评估其他临床相关疾病特征可能更为合适。我们旨在开发一种用于评估原发性干燥综合征患者治疗效果的新型复合终点:干燥综合征相关终点综合指标(CRESS)。

方法

一个多学科专家团队选择了临床相关项目和候选测量指标纳入复合评分。对于每项测量指标,根据专家意见、先前发表的关于最小临床重要改善的数据以及试验数据(主要是阿巴西普与安慰剂对比的单中心ASAP-III试验的第24周数据)选择治疗反应的界值点。CRESS使用来自三项独立RCT的数据进行验证:一项利妥昔单抗试验(TRACTISS)、一项阿巴西普试验(多国试验)和一项托珠单抗试验(ETAP)。我们计算了在单独的CRESS项目中反应者的数量和百分比,以及在主要终点访视时基于总CRESS的反应者百分比(TRACTISS为第48周,其他两项试验为第24周)。可用于评估CRESS反应的项目少于三项的患者被视为无反应者。

结果

基于专家意见,选择了五项互补项目来评估反应:(1)通过临床ESSDAI评估的全身疾病活动(小于5分);(2)通过EULAR干燥综合征患者报告指数评估的患者报告症状,评估标准为较基线至少降低1分或至少降低15%;(3)通过Schirmer试验和眼表染色评分评估的泪腺项目,对于基线时Schirmer试验或眼表染色评分异常的患者,评估标准分别为至少增加5mm或至少降低2分,对于基线值正常的患者,评估标准为两者均无变化至异常;(4)唾液腺项目,通过非刺激性全唾液分泌(至少增加25%)和唾液腺超声检查(至少降低25%)进行评估;(5)血清学,通过类风湿因子(至少降低25%)和IgG(至少降低10%)进行评估。总CRESS反应定义为五项中至少三项有反应。对3期试验数据的事后评估显示,在ASAP-III试验中,阿巴西普在主要终点访视时的CRESS反应率为60%(40例中的24例),而安慰剂为18%(39例中的7例)(p<0·0001);在TRACTISS试验中,利妥昔单抗为49%(67例中的33例),安慰剂为30%(66例中的20例)(p=0·026);在多国阿巴西普试验中,阿巴西普为45%(92例中的41例),安慰剂为32%(95例中的30例)(p=0·067);在ETAP试验中,托珠单抗为18%(55例中的10例),安慰剂为24%(55例中的13例)(p=0·48)。

解读

CRESS是一种可行、平衡良好的复合终点,可用于原发性干燥综合征的试验。下一步,CRESS需要在前瞻性RCT中进行验证。

资金来源

无。

欲获取摘要的荷兰语翻译,请参阅补充材料部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验