• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(从起始到标准治疗):一项单中心观察性研究。

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (from inception to standard treatment): a single-center observational study.

作者信息

Høydahl Martin Petter, Busund Rolf, Rösner Assami, Kjønås Didrik

机构信息

Clinical Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute of Clinical Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 15;11:1298346. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1298346. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1298346
PMID:38287983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10822919/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment of severe aortic stenosis with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was introduced in 2002. Since then, TAVI has become the primary treatment approach worldwide for advanced-age patients and younger patients with severe comorbidities. We aimed to evaluate the changes in patient demographics, complications, and mortality rates within 13 years.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 867 patients who underwent TAVI at the University Hospital of North Norway in Tromsø from 2008 to 2021. The 13-year period was divided into period 1 (2008-2012), period 2 (2013-2017), and period 3 (2018-2021). The primary objective was to evaluate the changes in periprocedural (30 days), early (30-365 days), and late mortality rates (>365 days) between the periods. The secondary objective was to evaluate late mortality rates by sex and age groups: <70 years, 70-79 years, 80-89 years, and ≥90 years.

RESULTS

The periprocedural mortality rates for periods 1, 2, and 3 were 10.3%, 2.9%, and 1.2%, respectively ( < 0.001). The early mortality rates were 5.6%, 5.8%, and 6.5%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in late mortality by sex or age group (<70, 70-79, and 80-89 years) with a median survival of 5.3-5.6 years. The median survival in patients aged ≥90 years was 4.0 years ( = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that most patients are octogenarians, and the burden of their comorbidities should be highly considered compared to their age when evaluating the procedural outcomes. As the incidence of most complications related to TAVI has decreased, the rates of permanent pacemaker implantation remain high. Important advancements in diagnostics, valve technology, and procedural techniques have improved the periprocedural mortality rates; however, early mortality remains unchanged and poses a clinical challenge that needs to be addressed in the future.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)于2002年开始用于治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄。自那时起,TAVI已成为全球范围内老年患者及合并严重疾病的年轻患者的主要治疗方法。我们旨在评估13年内患者人口统计学特征、并发症及死亡率的变化。

方法

这项回顾性观察性研究纳入了2008年至2021年在挪威特罗姆瑟大学医院接受TAVI治疗的867例患者。13年的时间段分为第1期(2008 - 2012年)、第2期(2013 - 2017年)和第3期(2018 - 2021年)。主要目的是评估各期围手术期(30天)、早期(30 - 365天)和晚期死亡率(>365天)的变化。次要目的是按性别和年龄组评估晚期死亡率:<70岁、70 - 79岁、80 - 89岁和≥90岁。

结果

第1期、第2期和第3期的围手术期死亡率分别为10.3%、2.9%和1.2%(<0.001)。早期死亡率分别为5.6%、5.8%和6.5%。按性别或年龄组(<70岁、70 - 79岁和80 - 89岁)划分的晚期死亡率无显著差异,中位生存期为5.3 - 5.6年。≥90岁患者的中位生存期为4.0年(P = 0.018)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,大多数患者为八旬老人,在评估手术结果时,与他们的年龄相比,应高度考虑其合并症负担。随着与TAVI相关的大多数并发症发生率下降,永久起搏器植入率仍然很高。诊断、瓣膜技术和手术技术的重要进展改善了围手术期死亡率;然而,早期死亡率保持不变,这是一个未来需要解决的临床挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10822919/ded115eb6380/fcvm-11-1298346-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10822919/927be7b08596/fcvm-11-1298346-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10822919/1505da0e0d15/fcvm-11-1298346-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10822919/9822738879fa/fcvm-11-1298346-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10822919/ded115eb6380/fcvm-11-1298346-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10822919/927be7b08596/fcvm-11-1298346-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10822919/1505da0e0d15/fcvm-11-1298346-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10822919/9822738879fa/fcvm-11-1298346-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10822919/ded115eb6380/fcvm-11-1298346-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (from inception to standard treatment): a single-center observational study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(从起始到标准治疗):一项单中心观察性研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 15;11:1298346. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1298346. eCollection 2024.
2
Is the outcome of elective vs non-elective patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation different? Results of a single-centre, observational assessment of outcomes at a large university clinic.择期与非择期行经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的结局是否不同?来自一家大型大学诊所的单中心观察性结局评估结果。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jun 10;23(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03317-5.
3
Short term clinical outcomes and analysis of risk factors for pacemaker implantation: a single center experience of self-expandable TAVI valves.短期临床结果和经皮自膨式 TAVI 瓣膜植入的危险因素分析:单中心经验。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jul 29;15(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01241-9.
4
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Severe Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis - 2 Years Follow up Experience From India.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗重度二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄——来自印度的2年随访经验
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 28;9:817705. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.817705. eCollection 2022.
5
Effect of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction on hospital outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement: results from a propensity-matched population of the Italian OBSERVANT multicenter study.严重左心室收缩功能障碍对经导管主动脉瓣植入术或外科主动脉瓣置换术后住院结局的影响:来自意大利 OBSERVANT 多中心研究倾向匹配人群的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
6
Minimalistic Approach for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): Open Vascular Vs. Fully Percutaneous Approach.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的极简方法:开放血管法与完全经皮法
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2019 Oct 1;40(2):5-14. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2019-0009.
7
Patients younger than 70 undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Procedural outcomes and mid-term survival.70岁以下接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术的患者:手术结果和中期生存率。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 Jun 9;34:100817. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100817. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
[Outcome comparison of different therapy procedures in surgical high-risk elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis].[外科高危老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者不同治疗方法的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):13-18. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.004.
9
Cerebral Embolic Protection in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using the Sentinel Cerebral Protection System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.使用Sentinel脑保护系统在经导管主动脉瓣植入术中进行脑栓塞保护:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiol Ther. 2024 Jun;13(2):299-314. doi: 10.1007/s40119-024-00359-4. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of TVT and STS Risk Score Performances in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中TVT和STS风险评分表现的评估
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Apr 21;2(3):100600. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100600. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
2
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients at Five Years.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在五年内的低危患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Nov 23;389(21):1949-1960. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307447. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
3
Mediators of Improvement in TAVR Outcomes Over Time: Insights From the STS-ACC TVT Registry.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)疗效随时间改善的介导因素:STS-ACC TVT 注册研究的新见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul;16(7):e013080. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013080. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
4
Impact of Paravalvular Leak on Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Meta-Analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived Individual Patient Data.瓣周漏对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后结局的影响:基于Kaplan-Meier法的个体患者数据的荟萃分析
Struct Heart. 2022 Nov 14;7(2):100118. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100118. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
3-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis.低风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术后3年的结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 May 2;81(17):1663-1674. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.02.017. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
6
Temporal changes of patient characteristics over 12 years in a single-center transcatheter aortic valve implantation cohort.12 年间单中心经导管主动脉瓣植入术队列患者特征的时间变化。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 May;112(5):691-701. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02166-8. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
7
Changes in aortic valve replacement procedures in Denmark from 2008 to 2020.2008年至2020年丹麦主动脉瓣置换手术的变化。
Heart. 2023 Mar 10;109(7):557-563. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321594.
8
Sex-Specific Considerations in Degenerative Aortic Stenosis for Female-Tailored Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation Management.女性特有的退行性主动脉瓣狭窄的性别相关考量因素:经股动脉主动脉瓣植入管理的女性化定制策略。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):e025944. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025944. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
9
Self-expanding Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of the SURTAVI Randomized Clinical Trial.经导管自膨式主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危患者的 5 年结果:SURTAVI 随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Oct 1;7(10):1000-1008. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2695.
10
Comorbidities may offset expected improved survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.合并症可能会抵消经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预期的生存改善。
Eur Heart J Open. 2022 Apr 16;2(3):oeac029. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeac029. eCollection 2022 May.