Cooley Abigail, Parker Paula, Grace Sarah, Thornton Andrew R, Bunn Jennifer A
Department of Exercise Science, Campbell University, Buies Creek, NC USA.
Department of Kinesiology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Sep 1;16(5):1182-1190. doi: 10.70252/PVDP4155. eCollection 2023.
Psychological hardiness encompasses three components: commitment, control, and challenge, and illustrates how individuals respond to stressors. Analyzing athletes' responses to wins and losses, depending on their psychological hardiness level, may provide insight of the impact of game outcome on student-athlete wellness. The purpose of this study was to examine postgame subjective wellness scores based on level of psychological hardiness following wins and losses in collegiate female lacrosse athletes. Players ( = 17) took the Dispositional Resilience Scale Scale-15 (DRS-15) at the start of the academic year and were grouped based on hardiness level: above average (AH) and below average (BA). Participants took a daily wellness survey rating their overall wellness, energy level, muscle soreness, stress level, and sleep quality. RM-ANOVA indicated no difference in post-game wellness scores between hardiness groups ((5,11) = 1.073, = .426, ES = .328), by game outcome ((5,11) = 2.361, = .109, ES = .518), or an interaction between hardiness and outcome of game ((5,11) = 1.421, = .291, ES = .392). No hardiness group differences were found for overall wellness or sub-scores. These results show subjective wellness scores decrease collectively after a loss versus a win but refute prior studies as hardy players did not experience significantly less stress than their less hardy counterparts. Future studies should be conducted to assess wellness after differing game outcomes over many seasons to assist coaching staff on the subjective, psychological impacts of game.
投入、掌控和挑战,并说明了个体如何应对压力源。根据运动员的心理韧性水平分析他们对胜负的反应,可能有助于洞察比赛结果对学生运动员健康状况的影响。本研究的目的是考察大学女子长曲棍球运动员在胜负比赛后基于心理韧性水平的赛后主观健康得分。运动员(n = 17)在学年开始时进行了15项特质复原力量表(DRS - 15)测试,并根据韧性水平分为:高于平均水平(AH)和低于平均水平(BA)。参与者每天进行一次健康状况调查,对他们的整体健康状况、能量水平、肌肉酸痛、压力水平和睡眠质量进行评分。重复测量方差分析表明,韧性组之间(F(5,11) = 1.073,p = .426,效应量ES = .328)、比赛结果之间(F(5,11) = 2.361,p = .109,效应量ES = .518)或韧性与比赛结果之间的交互作用(F(5,11) = 1.421,p = .291,效应量ES = .392)在赛后健康得分上没有差异。在整体健康状况或子分数方面未发现韧性组之间的差异。这些结果表明,与获胜相比,失败后主观健康得分总体下降,但反驳了先前的研究,因为坚韧的球员所经历的压力并不比不那么坚韧的球员明显小。未来应该进行研究,以评估多个赛季不同比赛结果后的健康状况,以帮助教练人员了解比赛对主观心理的影响。