Diel Kathi, Hofmann Wilhelm, Grelle Sonja, Boecker Lea, Friese Malte
Saarland University, Saarbrucken, Germany.
Ruhr University Bochum, Germany.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jan 30:1461672231219378. doi: 10.1177/01461672231219378.
In a preregistered ecological momentary intervention study, we alternately instructed participants to adopt an upward and downward comparison focus. In all, 349 participants reported 8,137 social comparison situations across 6 days and three comparison conditions (baseline, upward, downward). For each comparison, participants reported social comparison direction, motivation, effort intentions, and emotions in five daily reports and one daily end-of-day summary. As predicted, an upward comparison focus resulted in more self-improvement motivation (pushing) and more negative emotions, whereas days with a downward comparison focus resulted in decreased motivation (coasting) but more positive emotions (vs. baseline). However, at the end of the day, people experienced lower goal approach on upward but higher goal approach on downward comparison days. Hence, engaging in strategic upward comparison was motivating in the short term but resulted in surprisingly opposite effects at the end of the day. We offer possible explanations from cognitive and motivational perspectives.
在一项预先注册的生态瞬时干预研究中,我们交替指导参与者采用向上和向下的比较焦点。共有349名参与者在6天内报告了8137个社会比较情境以及三种比较条件(基线、向上、向下)。对于每次比较,参与者在五份每日报告和一份每日结束时的总结中报告了社会比较方向、动机、努力意图和情绪。正如预测的那样,向上比较焦点会导致更多的自我提升动机(进取)和更多的负面情绪,而向下比较焦点的日子会导致动机下降(放松)但更多的积极情绪(与基线相比)。然而,在一天结束时,人们在向上比较的日子里目标趋近较低,而在向下比较的日子里目标趋近较高。因此,进行策略性向上比较在短期内具有激励作用,但在一天结束时却产生了惊人的相反效果。我们从认知和动机角度提供了可能的解释。