Malhotra Armaan K, Shakil Husain, Smith Christopher W, Mathieu Francois, Merali Zamir, Jaffe Rachael H, Harrington Erin M, He Yingshi, Wijeysundera Duminda N, Kulkarni Abhaya V, Ladha Karim, Wilson Jefferson R, Nathens Avery B, Witiw Christopher D
Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Neurosurgery. 2024 Jan 30. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002840.
Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is complex, with a paucity of standardized guidelines. We aimed to assess the variability in WLST practices between trauma centers in North America.
This retrospective study used data from trauma centers through the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program between 2017 and 2020. We included adult patients (>16 years) with severe TBI and a documented decision for WLST. We constructed a series of hierarchical logistic regression models to adjust for patient, injury, and hospital attributes influencing WLST; residual between-center variability was characterized using the median odds ratio. The impact of disparate WLST practices was further assessed by ranking centers by their conditional random intercept and assessing mortality, length of stay, and WLST between quartiles.
We identified a total of 85 511 subjects with severe TBI treated across 510 trauma centers, of whom 20 300 (24%) had WLST. Patient-level factors associated with increased likelihood of WLST were advanced age, White race, self-pay, or Medicare insurance status (compared with private insurance). Black race was associated with reduced tendency for WLST. Treatment in nonprofit centers and higher-severity intracranial and extracranial injuries, midline shift, and pupil asymmetry also increased the likelihood for WLST. After adjustment for patient and hospital attributes, the median odds ratio was 1.45 (1.41-1.49 95% CI), suggesting residual variation in WLST between centers. When centers were grouped into quartiles by their propensity for WLST, there was increased adjusted mortality and shorter length of stay in fourth compared with first quartile centers.
We highlighted the presence of contextual phenomena associated with disparate WLST practice patterns between trauma centers after adjustment for case-mix and hospital attributes. These findings highlight a need for standardized WLST guidelines to improve equity of care provision for patients with severe TBI.
在重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中,撤除维持生命治疗(WLST)情况复杂,且缺乏标准化指南。我们旨在评估北美各创伤中心在WLST实践方面的差异。
这项回顾性研究使用了2017年至2020年期间通过美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进项目从各创伤中心收集的数据。我们纳入了年龄大于16岁、患有重度TBI且有记录表明已做出WLST决定的成年患者。我们构建了一系列分层逻辑回归模型,以调整影响WLST的患者、损伤和医院属性;中心间的残余差异通过中位数优势比来表征。通过根据条件随机截距对各中心进行排名,并评估四分位数之间的死亡率、住院时间和WLST情况,进一步评估不同WLST实践的影响。
我们共识别出510个创伤中心治疗的85511例重度TBI患者,其中20300例(24%)接受了WLST。与WLST可能性增加相关的患者层面因素包括高龄、白人种族、自费或医疗保险状况(与私人保险相比)。黑人种族与WLST倾向降低相关。在非营利性中心接受治疗以及颅内和颅外损伤严重程度更高、中线移位和瞳孔不对称也增加了WLST的可能性。在调整患者和医院属性后,中位数优势比为1.45(95%CI:1.41 - 1.49),表明各中心之间在WLST方面存在残余差异。当根据各中心进行WLST的倾向将其分为四分位数时,与第一四分位数中心相比,第四四分位数中心的调整后死亡率增加且住院时间缩短。
我们强调了在调整病例组合和医院属性后,创伤中心之间存在与不同WLST实践模式相关的背景现象。这些发现凸显了需要标准化的WLST指南,以改善为重度TBI患者提供医疗服务的公平性。