Department of Nursing, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Nurs Crit Care. 2024 Nov;29(6):1744-1750. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) is a common problem among critically ill patients with faecal incontinence (FI). However, there are few studies comparing the effects of different faecal collection devices impact the prevention of moderate to severe IAD in this patient population.
This review aims to compare the effectiveness of various devices for collecting faecal matter in preventing moderate to severe IAD in critically ill patients suffering from FI through a network meta-analysis.
We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, CENTRAL, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan fang, Wei Pu, and China Biomedicine (CBM) from their inception until May 4, 2023. The selected studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two researchers independently performed study selection and data extraction. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool Version 2.0. RevMan 5.4 was utilized for conventional pairwise meta-analysis of direct comparisons, while Stata16.0 was employed for network meta-analysis.
A total of 14 studies, involving 1345 patients, were included in the analysis. Pairwise meta-analysis showed that an anal bag[odds ratio(OR): 0.07(0.03, 0.20)], a balloon catheter[(OR:0.30(0.15, 0.62)], and an anal bag connected to negative pressure and flushing [(OR: 0.09(0.01,0.68)] all reduced the incidence of moderate to severe IAD in critically ill patients compared with usual care measures, respectively. The cumulative rank probabilities indicated that moderate to severe IAD prevention was more effective when employing balloon catheters connected to negative pressure [surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA): 20.8%] and anal bags connected to negative pressure (SUCRA: 27.0%) among critically ill patients with FI.
FI is a common problem among severely ill patients, and the reduction of moderate and severe IAD incidence is deemed essential. In this review, it is suggested that both balloon catheters connected to negative pressure and anal bags connected to negative pressure are associated with a higher effectiveness in preventing moderate and severe IAD.
The findings of this review can assist healthcare professionals in the selection of suitable stool management devices for the prevention of moderate to severe IAD in critically ill patients with FI.
失禁相关性皮炎(IAD)是粪便失禁(FI)的重症患者中常见的问题。然而,在这个患者群体中,很少有研究比较不同粪便收集装置对预防中重度 IAD 的效果。
本综述旨在通过网络荟萃分析比较各种粪便收集装置在预防 FI 重症患者中重度 IAD 的效果。
我们对 PubMed、Embase、ProQuest、CENTRAL、CINAHL Plus with Full Text、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、万方、维普和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)进行了系统检索,从建库至 2023 年 5 月 4 日。选择的研究为随机对照试验(RCT)。两位研究者独立进行研究选择和数据提取。我们使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具版本 2.0 评估偏倚风险。RevMan 5.4 用于直接比较的常规成对荟萃分析,Stata16.0 用于网络荟萃分析。
共有 14 项研究,涉及 1345 名患者,纳入分析。成对荟萃分析显示,与常规护理措施相比,肛门袋[比值比(OR):0.07(0.03,0.20)]、气囊导管[OR:0.30(0.15,0.62)]和连接负压和冲洗的肛门袋[OR:0.09(0.01,0.68)]均降低了重症患者中重度 IAD 的发生率。累积秩概率表明,在 FI 的重症患者中,使用连接负压的气囊导管[累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA):20.8%]和连接负压的肛门袋[SUCRA:27.0%]预防中重度 IAD 更为有效。
FI 在重症患者中较为常见,降低中重度 IAD 的发生率是至关重要的。本综述表明,连接负压的气囊导管和连接负压的肛门袋在预防中重度 IAD 方面都更有效。
本综述的结果可以帮助医疗保健专业人员选择合适的粪便管理装置,以预防 FI 的重症患者发生中重度 IAD。