Suppr超能文献

保留黄斑中心凹的内界膜翻转撕囊术与标准内界膜撕除术治疗症状性近视性黄斑劈裂的比较。

Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with inverted flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for symptomatic myopic foveoschisis.

机构信息

IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Via Don Sempreboni 5-Negrar, 37024, Verona, Italy.

Department of Cultures and Civilizations, University of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):2460. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53097-x.

Abstract

To study the long-term outcomes of standard ILM peeling and fovea sparing with inverted flap (FSIF) peeling for symptomatic myopic foveoschisis (MF). This retrospective observational study included 36 eyes of 34 consecutive patients who underwent vitrectomy with standard ILM peeling and FSIF peeling for MF between April 2012 and march 2020. The primary outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) at 1 month and final visit and postoperative development of macular hole. There were 14 eyes in the standard ILM peeling group and 22 eyes and in the FSIF peeling groups with a mean FU of 34.2 months (SD 23.3; min. 12-max. 96) and 27.7 months (SD 14.9; min. 12-max. 63), respectively. In both groups BCVA was not significantly improved at 1 month but improved at last visit from 0.55 ± 0.21 to 0.37 ± 0.29 in the standard ILM peeling group (P = 0.0154) and from 0.57 ± 0.27 to 0.28 ± 0.23 in the FSIF peeling group (P < 0.0001). At 1 month and final visit CMT decreased from 572 ± 183.5 µm to 277.5 ± 95.2 µm and to 250.4 ± 96.1 µm, respectively, in the standard ILM peeling group and from 589.9 ± 189.8 µm to 383 ± 110.1 µm and 162.3 ± 74.8 µm in the FSIF peeling group (P < 0.001 for both groups at both time-points). The preoperative and postoperative BCVA and CMT showed no significant differences between groups. Three of the eyes in the standard ILM peeling group developed postoperative macular hole at 1, 10, 24 months, respectively, and none of the eyes in the FSIF peeling group. Multivariate analysis revealed that a better BCVA was the only independent factor correlated with the final BCVA. In this study, standard ILM peeling and FSIF peeling were both beneficial in improving the anatomy and function of eyes with MF. Postoperative MH may occur up to 2 years after standard peeling and seem effectively prevented by FSIF peeling.

摘要

研究标准内界膜剥离联合倒置式内界膜瓣(FSIF)剥离治疗症状性近视性黄斑劈裂(MF)的长期结果。这项回顾性观察研究纳入了 2012 年 4 月至 2020 年 3 月期间因 MF 接受玻璃体切割联合标准内界膜剥离和 FSIF 剥离的 34 例连续患者的 36 只眼。主要结局指标包括术后 1 个月和末次随访时的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中心视网膜厚度(CFT)以及术后黄斑裂孔的发生。标准内界膜剥离组 14 只眼,FSIF 剥离组 22 只眼,平均随访 34.2 个月(标准差 23.3;最小 12 个月,最大 96 个月)和 27.7 个月(标准差 14.9;最小 12 个月,最大 63 个月)。两组术后 1 个月时 BCVA 均无显著改善,但末次随访时,标准内界膜剥离组从 0.55±0.21 提高至 0.37±0.29(P=0.0154),FSIF 剥离组从 0.57±0.27 提高至 0.28±0.23(P<0.0001)。两组术后 1 个月和末次随访时,CMT 分别从 572±183.5μm 下降至 277.5±95.2μm 和 250.4±96.1μm,标准内界膜剥离组从 589.9±189.8μm 下降至 383±110.1μm 和 162.3±74.8μm(两组在两个时间点均 P<0.001)。两组术前和术后 BCVA 和 CMT 无显著差异。标准内界膜剥离组 3 只眼分别于术后 1、10、24 个月发生黄斑裂孔,FSIF 剥离组无眼发生。多变量分析显示,较好的 BCVA 是与最终 BCVA 相关的唯一独立因素。在这项研究中,标准内界膜剥离和 FSIF 剥离均有益于改善 MF 眼的解剖和功能。黄斑裂孔可能在标准剥离后 2 年内发生,FSIF 剥离似乎可有效预防。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00ce/10828410/63699bd27ad2/41598_2024_53097_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验