Suppr超能文献

睫状体光凝术与微脉冲经巩膜激光治疗的对比。

Cyclodiode vs micropulse transscleral laser treatment.

机构信息

Imperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

ICORG, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2024 Jun;38(8):1477-1484. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-02929-1. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuous-wave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CW-TSCP) is usually reserved for advanced/refractory glaucoma. Micropulse transscleral laser therapy (MPTLT) utilises short energy pulses separated by 'off'-periods. MPTLT is postulated to have fewer complications, but its relative efficacy is not known. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has deemed the evidence supporting MPTLT use of inadequate quality, limiting its use to research. This study aims to evaluate MPTLT efficacy and safety compared to CW-TSCP.

METHODS

This 24-month follow-up retrospective audit included 85 CW-TSCP and 173 MPTLT eyes at a London tertiary referral centre. Primary outcome was success rate at the last follow-up; defined as at least 20% intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction with the same/fewer medications, and IOP between 6 and 18 mmHg. Secondary outcomes were acetazolamide use and success rates per glaucoma type. Safety outcomes were reported as complication rates.

RESULTS

By 24-months, mean IOP reduced from 34.6[±1.4]mmHg to 19.0[ ± 3.0]mmHg post-CW-TSCP (p < 0.0001); and from 26.1[±0.8]mmHg to 19.1[±2.2]mmHg post-MPTLT (p < 0.0001). Average IOP decreased by 45.1% post-CW-TSCP, and 26.8% post-MPTLT. Both interventions reduced medication requirements (p ≤ 0.05). More CW-TSCP patients discontinued acetazolamide (p = 0.047). Overall success rate was 26.6% for CW-TSCP and 30.6% for MPTLT (p = 0.83). Only primary closed-angle glaucoma saw a significantly higher success rate following CW-TSCP (p = 0.014). CW-TSCP complication rate was significantly higher than MPTLT (p = 0.0048).

CONCLUSION

Both treatments significantly reduced IOP and medication load. CW-TSCP had a greater absolute/proportionate IOP-lowering effect, but it carried a significantly greater risk of sight-threatening complications. Further prospective studies are required to evaluate MPTLT compared to CW-TSCP.

摘要

背景

连续波经巩膜睫状体光凝术(CW-TSCP)通常用于治疗晚期/难治性青光眼。微脉冲经巩膜激光疗法(MPTLT)利用短能量脉冲,脉冲之间有“关闭”期。MPTLT 据推测并发症较少,但它的相对疗效尚不清楚。英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NICE)认为,支持 MPTLT 应用的证据质量不足,限制了其在研究中的应用。本研究旨在评估 MPTLT 与 CW-TSCP 的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项在伦敦三级转诊中心进行的为期 24 个月的回顾性审计,纳入了 85 只接受 CW-TSCP 治疗的眼和 173 只接受 MPTLT 治疗的眼。主要结局是末次随访时的成功率;定义为眼压(IOP)至少降低 20%,同时使用相同或更少的药物,IOP 在 6 至 18mmHg 之间。次要结局是乙酰唑胺的使用和每种青光眼类型的成功率。安全性结局以并发症发生率报告。

结果

在 24 个月时,CW-TSCP 治疗后平均 IOP 从 34.6[±1.4]mmHg 降至 19.0[±3.0]mmHg(p<0.0001);MPTLT 治疗后从 26.1[±0.8]mmHg 降至 19.1[±2.2]mmHg(p<0.0001)。CW-TSCP 治疗后 IOP 平均下降 45.1%,MPTLT 治疗后下降 26.8%。两种干预措施都降低了药物的需求(p≤0.05)。CW-TSCP 组更多患者停止使用乙酰唑胺(p=0.047)。CW-TSCP 的总体成功率为 26.6%,MPTLT 的成功率为 30.6%(p=0.83)。只有原发性闭角型青光眼在 CW-TSCP 治疗后有显著更高的成功率(p=0.014)。CW-TSCP 的并发症发生率明显高于 MPTLT(p=0.0048)。

结论

两种治疗方法均显著降低了 IOP 和药物负荷。CW-TSCP 的降压效果更大,但发生威胁视力的并发症的风险显著更高。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来评估 MPTLT 与 CW-TSCP 的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4085/11126682/98c4c1135ed2/41433_2024_2929_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验