• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股骨颈骨折行 THA 术后髋关节后脱位的危险因素分析:髋关节前倾角和外展角不足是其危险因素。

Insufficient stem antetorsion and lower cup abduction is a combined risk factor for posterior hip dislocation in patients undergoing THA for femoral neck fractures: a retrospective analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical College, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 30;25(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07199-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07199-2
PMID:38291445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10826068/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of acetabular and femoral component positions with respect to the risk of post-operative instability and dislocation remains debated. In this study, we aimed to identify potential risk factors for early dislocation following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures (FNF) using radiological measurements.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data for patients who underwent cementless primary THA for FNF using a posterolateral approach between January 2018 and December 2021. Follow-up duration, age, sex, affected side, and mean time from THA to dislocation were recorded. Leg-length inequality, abductor lever arm, vertical and horizontal femoral offsets, vertical and horizontal hip centers of rotation, abduction, anteversion of the acetabulum and femoral prosthesis, and combined anteversion were measured.

RESULTS

The study sample included 17 men and 34 women, with 21 and 30 patients undergoing left- and right-hip operations, respectively. The mean patient age was 70.18 ± 7.64 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 27.73 ± 13.52 months. The mean time between THA and dislocation was 1.58 ± 0.79 months. Seven patients (13.73%) sustained posterior dislocation of the hip. The abduction angle (36.05 ± 6.82° vs. 45.68 ± 8.78°) (p = 0.008) and anteversion of the femoral prosthesis (8.26 ± 4.47° vs. 19.47 ± 9.01°) (p = 0.002) were significantly lower in the dislocation group than in the control group. There were no significant differences in other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Insufficient stem antetorsion combined with lower abduction angle of the acetabular component were associated with a high risk of dislocation, especially in patients with deep flexion or internal rotation of the flexed hip joint and knees, or in patients with a stiff spine or anterior pelvic tilt, impingement may then occur in the neck of the prosthesis and cup component, ultimately resulting in posterior dislocation. These findings could remind surgeons to avoid simultaneous occurrence of both in THA surgery. These results provide new insight into risk factors for hip dislocation in patients undergoing primary THA for FNF and may aid in reducing the risk of instability and dislocation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective comparative study Level II.

摘要

背景

髋臼和股骨部件位置与术后不稳定和脱位风险的关系仍存在争议。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过影像学测量来确定使用后外侧入路行非骨水泥初次全髋关节置换术(THA)治疗移位型囊内股骨颈骨折(FNF)患者术后早期脱位的潜在危险因素。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间使用后外侧入路行 FNF 非骨水泥初次 THA 的患者数据。记录随访时间、年龄、性别、患侧、THA 至脱位的平均时间。记录下肢长度不等、外展肌臂长、垂直和水平股骨偏移量、垂直和水平髋关节旋转中心、外展角、髋臼和股骨假体前倾角以及联合前倾角。

结果

本研究样本包括 17 名男性和 34 名女性,左髋和右髋手术分别为 21 例和 30 例。患者平均年龄为 70.18±7.64 岁,平均随访时间为 27.73±13.52 个月。THA 至脱位的平均时间为 1.58±0.79 个月。7 例(13.73%)发生髋关节后脱位。脱位组患者的外展角(36.05±6.82° vs. 45.68±8.78°)(p=0.008)和股骨假体前倾角(8.26±4.47° vs. 19.47±9.01°)(p=0.002)显著低于对照组。其他参数无显著差异。

结论

股骨柄的初始扭转不足与髋臼部件的较低外展角与脱位风险增加有关,尤其是在髋关节处于深屈或内旋位、膝关节弯曲、或脊柱僵硬、骨盆前倾的患者中,假体颈部和杯组件可能发生撞击,最终导致后脱位。这些发现可以提醒外科医生在 THA 手术中避免同时出现这两种情况。这些结果为初次 THA 治疗 FNF 患者髋关节脱位的危险因素提供了新的认识,并可能有助于降低不稳定和脱位的风险。

证据水平

前瞻性比较研究 II 级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da52/10826068/ad418b7e79cb/12891_2024_7199_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da52/10826068/45983cb85b06/12891_2024_7199_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da52/10826068/ad418b7e79cb/12891_2024_7199_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da52/10826068/45983cb85b06/12891_2024_7199_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da52/10826068/ad418b7e79cb/12891_2024_7199_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Insufficient stem antetorsion and lower cup abduction is a combined risk factor for posterior hip dislocation in patients undergoing THA for femoral neck fractures: a retrospective analysis.股骨颈骨折行 THA 术后髋关节后脱位的危险因素分析:髋关节前倾角和外展角不足是其危险因素。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 30;25(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07199-2.
2
Low dislocation rate of Saturne/Avantage dual-mobility THA after displaced femoral neck fracture: a cohort study of 966 hips with a minimum 1.6-year follow-up.股骨颈骨折移位后Saturne/Avantage双动全髋关节置换术的低脱位率:一项对966例髋关节进行的队列研究,最短随访1.6年。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 May;139(5):605-612. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3093-8. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
3
The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.全髋关节置换术中髋臼前倾角的安全区范围比倾斜角的安全区范围更窄。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):325-335. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000051.
4
Comparative study of total hip arthroplasties with dual mobility cups versus hemiarthroplasties in management of femoral neck fractures: Survival and dislocation rate at 5 years of follow-up?双动髋臼杯全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的比较研究:5年随访时的生存率和脱位率?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Feb;108(1):103098. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103098. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
5
Is Isolated Mobile Component Exchange an Option in the Management of Intraprosthetic Dislocation of a Dual Mobility Cup?是否可选择单独更换移动部件来处理双动杯假体脱位?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Feb;478(2):279-287. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001055.
6
Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty with a dual-mobility cup. Matched case-control study (16 cases vs. 48 controls).翻修全髋关节置换术后双动杯脱位的危险因素:配对病例对照研究(16 例与 48 例对照)。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Nov;105(7):1303-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 May 29.
7
Total hip arthroplasty after failed treatment of proximal femur fracture.股骨近端骨折治疗失败后的全髋关节置换术。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Mar;137(3):417-424. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2631-0. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
8
THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.全髋关节置换治疗股骨颈骨折:比较标准头型、大头型、双动和限制性衬垫的翻修率和脱位率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jan 1;479(1):72-81. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001447.
9
Direction of hip arthroplasty dislocation in patients with femoral neck fractures.髋关节置换术后股骨颈骨折患者的脱位方向。
Int Orthop. 2010 Jun;34(5):641-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0943-6. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
10
Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek's safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls.能否定义一个比Lewinnek安全区更安全的目标区域来预防全髋关节置换术的不稳定?对56例髋关节置换术后脱位患者和93例匹配对照进行病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Sep;103(5):657-661. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of patients showing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty in an acute care hospital: A retrospective cohort study.急性护理医院中全髋关节置换术后出现脱位的患者特征:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 6;104(23):e42664. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042664.
2
Relating total hip replacement and acetabular cup positioning with outcome: A systematic review.全髋关节置换术与髋臼杯定位和预后的关系:一项系统综述。
Bioinformation. 2025 Feb 28;21(2):145-154. doi: 10.6026/973206300210145. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of the femoral component orientation on dislocations in THA: a systematic review.股骨部件方向对全髋关节置换术后脱位的作用:系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jun;142(6):1253-1264. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03982-1. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
2
Accuracy of CT for measuring femoral neck anteversion in children with developmental dislocation of the hip verified using 3D printing technology.CT 测量发育性髋关节脱位儿童股骨颈前倾角的准确性,经 3D 打印技术验证。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Apr 14;16(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02400-x.
3
The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.
THA 中,关节无撞击、假体特异和解剖调整的联合目标区域取决于假体的设计和植入参数。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Aug;478(8):1904-1918. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001233.
4
Changes of acetabular anteversion according to pelvic tilt on sagittal plane under various acetabular inclinations.在不同髋臼倾斜度下,矢状面上髋臼前倾角随骨盆倾斜的变化。
J Orthop Res. 2021 Apr;39(4):806-812. doi: 10.1002/jor.24790. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
5
Modern cup alignment techniques in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.全髋关节置换术中的现代杯对齐技术:系统评价。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):907-913. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 May 1.
6
Late Dislocation Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: Spinopelvic Imbalance as a Causative Factor.髋关节置换术后晚期脱位:脊柱骨盆失衡是一个致病因素。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 7;100(21):1845-1853. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00078.
7
Lack of consensus on optimal acetabular cup orientation because of variation in assessment methods in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.全髋关节置换术中由于评估方法的差异,对于髋臼杯最佳方向缺乏共识:一项系统综述
Hip Int. 2019 Jan;29(1):41-50. doi: 10.1177/1120700018759306. Epub 2018 May 17.
8
Implant Survival and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients.年轻患者全髋关节置换术后的种植体存活率和患者报告的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Sep;33(9):2893-2898. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
9
Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯位置与脱位风险
Acta Orthop. 2017 Feb;88(1):10-17. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1251255. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
10
Dislocation after total hip replacement - there is no such thing as a safe zone for socket placement with the posterior approach.全髋关节置换术后脱位——采用后入路时,髋臼假体置入不存在安全区域这一说法。
Hip Int. 2016 Mar-Apr;26(2):121-7. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000318. Epub 2016 Feb 5.