Skidmore Jeffrey, Yuan Yi, He Shuman
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, 915 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, OH 43212, USA.
Department of Audiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.
medRxiv. 2024 Jan 17:2024.01.17.24301435. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.17.24301435.
This report presents a new method for removing electrical artifact contamination from the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) evoked by single cathodic-leading, biphasic-pulse stimulation. The development of the new method is motivated by results recorded in human cochlear implant (CI) users showing that the fundamental assumption of the classic forward masking artifact rejection technique is violated in up to 45% of cases tested at high stimulation levels when using default stimulation parameters. Subsequently, the new method developed based on the discovery that a hyperbola best characterizes the artifacts created during stimulation and recording is described. The eCAP waveforms obtained using the new method are compared to those recorded using the classic forward masking technique. The results show that eCAP waveforms obtained using both methods are comparable when the fundamental assumption of the classic forward masking technique is met. In contrast, eCAP amplitudes obtained using the two methods are significantly different when the fundamental assumption of the classic forward masking technique is violated, with greater differences in the eCAP amplitude for greater assumption violations. The new method also has excellent test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation > 0.98). Overall, the new method is a viable alternative to the classic forward masking technique for obtaining artifact-free eCAPs evoked by single-pulse stimulation in CI users.
本报告介绍了一种新方法,用于去除由单阴极引导双相脉冲刺激诱发的电诱发复合动作电位(eCAP)中的电伪迹污染。新方法的开发是受人类人工耳蜗(CI)使用者记录结果的启发,这些结果表明,在使用默认刺激参数的情况下,在高刺激水平下测试的高达45%的案例中,经典前向掩蔽伪迹抑制技术的基本假设被违反。随后,描述了基于以下发现开发的新方法:双曲线最能表征刺激和记录过程中产生的伪迹。将使用新方法获得的eCAP波形与使用经典前向掩蔽技术记录的波形进行比较。结果表明,当满足经典前向掩蔽技术的基本假设时,使用两种方法获得的eCAP波形具有可比性。相比之下,当经典前向掩蔽技术的基本假设被违反时,使用这两种方法获得的eCAP幅度存在显著差异,假设违反程度越大,eCAP幅度差异越大。新方法还具有出色的重测可靠性(组内相关>0.98)。总体而言,对于在CI使用者中获得单脉冲刺激诱发的无伪迹eCAP,新方法是经典前向掩蔽技术的可行替代方法。