The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the effect of advanced age on how effectively a cochlear implant (CI) electrode stimulates the targeted cochlear nerve fibers (i.e., the electrode-neuron interface [ENI]) in postlingually deafened adult CI users. The study tested the hypothesis that the quality of the ENI declined with advanced age. It also tested the hypothesis that the effect of advanced age on the quality of the ENI would be greater in basal regions of the cochlea compared to apical regions.

DESIGN

Study participants included 40 postlingually deafened adult CI users. The participants were separated into two age groups based on age at testing in accordance with age classification terms used by the World Health Organization and the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online bibliographic database. The middle-aged group included 16 participants between the ages of 45 and 64 years and the elderly group included 24 participants older than 65 years. Results were included from one ear for each participant. All participants used Cochlear Nucleus CIs in their test ears. For each participant, electrophysiological measures of the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) were used to measure refractory recovery functions and amplitude growth functions (AGFs) at three to seven electrode sites across the electrode array. The eCAP parameters used in this study included the refractory recovery time estimated based on the eCAP refractory recovery function, the eCAP threshold, the slope of the eCAP AGF, and the negative-peak (i.e., N1) latency. The electrode-specific ENI was evaluated using an optimized combination of the eCAP parameters that represented the responsiveness of cochlear nerve fibers to electrical stimulation delivered by individual electrodes along the electrode array. The quality of the electrode-specific ENI was quantified by the local ENI index, a value between 0 and 100 where 0 and 100 represented the lowest- and the highest-quality ENI across all participants and electrodes in the study dataset, respectively.

RESULTS

There were no significant age group differences in refractory times, eCAP thresholds, N1 latencies or local ENI indices. Slopes of the eCAP AGF were significantly larger in the middle-aged group compared to the elderly group. There was a significant effect of electrode location on each eCAP parameter, except for N1 latency. In addition, the local ENI index was significantly larger (i.e., better ENI) in the apical region than in the basal and middle regions of the cochlea for both age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The model developed in this study can be used to estimate the quality of the ENI at individual electrode locations in CI users. The quality of the ENI is affected by the location of the electrode along the length of the cochlea. The method for estimating the quality of the ENI developed in this study holds promise for identifying electrodes with poor ENIs that could be deactivated from the clinical programming map. The ENI is not strongly affected by advanced age in middle-aged and elderly CI users.