• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long waitlists for outpatient drug allergy referrals: An Australian tertiary centre experience.门诊药物过敏转诊的长等候名单:澳大利亚一家三级中心的经验
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Jan 9;17(2):100863. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100863. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Description and accuracy of antibiotic allergy labels at North Shore Hospital.北岸医院抗生素过敏标签的描述和准确性。
N Z Med J. 2023 Jul 7;136(1578):32-38. doi: 10.26635/6965.5742.
3
The revolving door: antibiotic allergy labelling in a tertiary care centre.旋转门:三级保健中心的抗生素过敏标签
Intern Med J. 2016 Nov;46(11):1276-1283. doi: 10.1111/imj.13223.
4
The prevalence and impact of antimicrobial allergies and adverse drug reactions at an Australian tertiary centre.澳大利亚一家三级医疗中心抗菌药物过敏及药物不良反应的患病率与影响
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Dec 16;15:572. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1303-3.
5
Antibiotic Allergy Labels in Children Are Associated with Adverse Clinical Outcomes.儿童的抗生素过敏标签与不良临床结局相关。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Mar;7(3):975-982. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
6
Synchronous Telemedicine in Allergy: Lessons Learned and Transformation of Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.同步远程医疗在过敏领域的应用:COVID-19 大流行期间的经验教训和护理模式转变。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jan;9(1):170-176.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
A novel 2-step process for the management of inpatient beta-lactam allergy labels.一种用于管理住院患者β-内酰胺类过敏标签的新型 2 步流程。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024 Apr;132(4):525-531.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.12.028. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
8
Improving inpatient paediatric de-labelling of allergies to beta-lactams: a quality improvement study.改善住院儿童β-内酰胺类过敏的去标签化:一项质量改进研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2024 Dec 13;110(1):26-30. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326533.
9
The effects of beta-lactam allergy relabeling on antibiotic prescribing practices.β-内酰胺类过敏重新标注对抗生素处方行为的影响。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022 Mar;128(3):307-313. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
10
The role of skin testing and extended antibiotic courses in assessment of children with penicillin allergy: An Australian experience.皮肤试验和延长抗生素疗程在青霉素过敏儿童评估中的作用:澳大利亚的经验。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Apr;55(4):428-432. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14220. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Penicillin or cephalosporin antibiotic allergy label: Influence on length of stay and hospital readmission.青霉素或头孢菌素类抗生素过敏标识:对住院时间和再入院的影响。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 May 3;3(3):100272. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100272. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Low frequency of allergy referral for penicillin allergy evaluation in an urban Boston primary care setting.在波士顿市区基层医疗环境中,因青霉素过敏评估而转诊过敏专科的频率较低。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2022 Oct 26;2(1):93-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2022.09.004. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Assessment of multiple-opinion referrals and consults at the BC Children's Hospital Allergy Clinic.对不列颠哥伦比亚省儿童医院过敏诊所多专家会诊转诊及咨询的评估。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2023 Jun 14;19(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13223-023-00806-2.
3
Amoxicillin oral provocation challenge in a primary care clinic: a descriptive analysis.在基层医疗诊所进行阿莫西林口服激发挑战:描述性分析。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Apr 16;9(2):E394-E399. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200077. Print 2021 Apr-Jun.
4
Specialist perioperative allergy clinic services in the UK 2018: Results from the Royal College of Anaesthetists Sixth National Audit Project (NAP6) investigation of perioperative anaphylaxis.英国 2018 年围手术期过敏专科诊所服务:皇家麻醉师学院第六次围手术期过敏国家审计项目(NAP6)对围手术期过敏反应调查的结果。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2018 Jul;48(7):846-861. doi: 10.1111/cea.13180. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
5
The Effect of Penicillin Allergy Testing on Future Health Care Utilization: A Matched Cohort Study.青霉素过敏试验对未来医疗保健利用的影响:一项匹配队列研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 May-Jun;5(3):705-710. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
6
Systematic review of pathways for the delivery of allergy services.过敏服务提供途径的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 7;7(2):e012647. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012647.
7
Allergy medical care network: a new model of care for specialties.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2015 Jan-Feb;43(1):48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2013.09.015. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
8
Utility of penicillin allergy testing in patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy.有青霉素过敏史患者的青霉素过敏试验的效用
Asia Pac Allergy. 2013 Apr;3(2):115-9. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2013.3.2.115. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

门诊药物过敏转诊的长等候名单:澳大利亚一家三级中心的经验

Long waitlists for outpatient drug allergy referrals: An Australian tertiary centre experience.

作者信息

Ali Syed, Hughes Tiffany, Smith Anthony

机构信息

Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia.

School of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.

出版信息

World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Jan 9;17(2):100863. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100863. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100863
PMID:38293273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10825046/
Abstract

Drug allergy clinic waitlist time data are limited. A 24-month retrospective study of drug allergy referrals was undertaken at a tertiary hospital in Australia. One hundred six patients were reviewed with a median age of 50 years (IQR 40.5-67.3) and a female predominance (n = 76, 71%). Face-to-face consultations were common (n = 83, 78.3%) with the remainder being telephone consultations. General practitioners comprised just over one-third (n = 38, 35.9%) of the referrers but majority being from within the hospital, such as the emergency department (n = 22, 20.8%). Most patients (n = 100, 94.3%) were triaged as Category 1 or urgent. Antibiotic allergies were common (n = 75, 70.8%), of which majority were beta-lactam antibiotics (n = 71, 95%): 55 (73.3%) for penicillins and 16 (15.1%) for cephalosporins. The median waitlist time was 178 days (IQR 48.5-502.5) and only 18 (17%) of Category 1 were seen within urgent timeframe. Telephone consultation had a significantly shorter waitlist time (median 47 days; IQR 6-245) compared to face-to-face consultations (median 267 days; IQR 69-519) (p = 0.026). Large waitlist times are present for drug allergy, and given the majority of referrers are from hospitals, inpatient drug allergy assessment remains paramount. Beta-lactam antibiotic drug allergy labels remain common, and given their negative implications, further work is needed. Economic and human resources evaluations are required to address this shortfall.

摘要

药物过敏门诊候诊时间的数据有限。在澳大利亚一家三级医院对药物过敏转诊患者进行了一项为期24个月的回顾性研究。共审查了106例患者,中位年龄为50岁(四分位间距40.5 - 67.3),女性居多(n = 76,71%)。面对面咨询很常见(n = 83,78.3%),其余为电话咨询。转诊医生中全科医生略超过三分之一(n = 38,35.9%),但大多数来自医院内部,如急诊科(n = 22,20.8%)。大多数患者(n = 100,94.3%)被分诊为1类或紧急情况。抗生素过敏很常见(n = 75,70.8%),其中大多数是β-内酰胺类抗生素(n = 71,95%):青霉素过敏55例(73.3%),头孢菌素过敏16例(15.1%)。中位候诊时间为178天(四分位间距48.5 - 502.5),只有18例(17%)1类患者在紧急时间范围内得到诊治。与面对面咨询(中位267天;四分位间距69 - 519)相比,电话咨询的候诊时间明显更短(中位47天;四分位间距6 - 245)(p = 0.026)。药物过敏存在较长的候诊时间,鉴于大多数转诊医生来自医院,住院药物过敏评估仍然至关重要。β-内酰胺类抗生素药物过敏标签仍然很常见,鉴于其负面影响,需要进一步开展工作。需要进行经济和人力资源评估以弥补这一不足。